This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Agreed, but if a comparable subreddit was started for trans suicides or other left-orientated 'natural consequences of indulging the initial reflex to do something dumb' it would be nuked from orbit.
I wonder what that would be?
Like, there’s liberals who do dumb things. But there doesn’t seem to be a massive pattern in which dumb things. Obesity is in practice not a liberal thing. R/shouldn’thavefoughtthecops gets nuked for racial insensitivity, not ideology. R/detrans maybe?
Obesity is arguably a dumb thing, but it's generally more seen as a lazy or weak thing. Glamorizing obesity - followed by the health consequences that follow - is the dumb thing that people could point to. I recall people actually have done this, with a viral clip recently of some transgender YouTuber listing examples of fat activists and/or others who tended to glamorize the lifestyle that would lead to obesity who died at comically young ages. Don't know that there'd be enough content to support a full subreddit, though.
I'm not sure how this works. Assuming this subreddit would be to showcase people getting beaten or killed for fighting the cops, and the racial insensitivity being alluded to hear has to do with the likely disproportionate number (relative to the general population, though perhaps not relative to actual police interactions) of people of certain races who would show up in such videos, that just seems like a case of ideology. The belief that showcasing a disproportionate number of people of certain races being harmed by police is racially insensitive is, in itself, ideological.
More options
Context Copy link
Trans stuff. Fatpersonacceptance movements tend to be more left-coded even if obesity itself isn't
I think the sub for making fun of fat acceptance advocates getting their faces eaten by leopards is, in practice, /r/fatpeoplehate, which got nuked for being horrible and insensitive and not directly for political reasons.
I agree that trans stuff, to a lesser extent other LGBT, and maybe progressive attitudes towards sex more broadly is the main liberal coded way to hurt yourself through stupidity(you might could add in certain categories of drug use but definitely not all of them). I agree that subs making fun of them for facing the consequences would probably be short lived, although I imagine the reasoning is more along the lines of ‘vulnerable people’ and less along the lines of progressive ideology. Offline conservatives don’t talk so callously about trans suicide either.
It astounds me that some people actually still buy this logic. You actually think Reddit of all places just takes some bold universal stance in the name of all that is wholesome and pure against the "horrible and insensitive"? The place where "horrible and insensitive" content directed at the right targets (that is, right-wingers, if the italics didn't strike you) is nearly universal and openly celebrated?
Incidentally, the public record will show that /r/fatpeoplehate was taken out by being accused of "doxxing" by the Reddit admins for highlighting publicly available images (that is, pictures on public "About Us" and other staff pages until they were taken down (I believe, been a long time, could be wrong) after being discovered) of overweight Imgur employees (who had started removing content from the sub uploaded there)... including the company's designated mascot/office dog (leading to probably the most notable aspect of the affair, the persistent slogan of "Even their dog is fat." (and yes the dog was indeed visibly and objectively afflicted by canine obesity)).
More options
Context Copy link
That's kind of the point, though. Obesity is a considerable bigger deal than COVID in terms of health impacts and yet making fun of fat acceptance is outside of the Overton Window
More options
Context Copy link
Well, /r/fatlogic is still alive and kicking, though it's mods tend to be cautious lest the admins nuke the place. About the spiciest type of comment you can get away with is remarking on the irony of various super-morbidly obese persons who advocated for fat rights and then died in their 40's.
That sub has fallen off tremendously in terms of activity from 6-8 years ago, which is a somewhat unusual thing to see on Reddit. I often wonder why that occurred.
I'm sure mod behavior is part of it; they've really narrowed the sub's boundaries to avoid becoming the new /r/fatpeoplehate and they're not shy about deleting posts that fall outside the lines.
I also feel like there's a certain inherent tension that causes a chilling effect. Is fat-activism a logical extension of the modern leftism, that calls the whole victimology apparatus into question, or is it a vile heresy that can and should be stamped out without harming the rest of the good and necessary structure? Only the latter is acceptable to say out loud over there, but there's a good chunk of the user base that leans towards the former, and mostly knows they have to bite their tongues on the subject.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Jared Taylor had an episode of his show dedicated to white missionaries who go to Haiti to run orphanages and get robbed and murdered. It was done in his usual respectful and restrained way but the subtext was 'these people are very naive and very very stupid': https://www.amren.com/videos/2024/05/haiti-devours-white-missionaries/
Similar things probably happen to aid workers too, from a certain point of view the religious and secular organizations are one and the same.
‘Missionary in a shithole’ says ‘conservative Christian’ to me, not liberal or progressive. I mean, I wouldn’t allow my kid to go on mission to Haiti, but that’s exactly the kind of person who does go on mission to Haiti- not a liberal. I think everyone knows the risks awaiting peace corps workers too and they don’t get made fun of because of the perception that they chose to take that risk perfectly cognizant of how big a risk it is.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link