This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Numbers I've seen show that the risk of UTI in uncircumcised infants is 10× that of circumcised infants. The numbers drop to 6× in childhood and 4× in adulthood. The infant number is what they're most worried about, though, since infants can't exactly communicate symptoms easily and untreated UTIs at that age can cause kidney damage and all sorts of other problems. I'm not that motivated on either side of things, but I'm irritated with the activists out there who act like circumcision is mutilation akin to sexual anesthesia. There are clear benefits, and whether those benefits outweigh the disadvantages is something to take into consideration, but the disadvantages are often overstated.
I know for my mother the risk of severe complications from the surgery (very rare approx 2-6/1000) was decisive in deciding against it.
More options
Context Copy link
Don't women get a lot more UTIs than men? I don't think it is as big a deal as many do, I know tons of people both circumcised and not, it hasn't impacted anyone's life that much. The ultra online people crazy about it are often damaged in a lot of other ways, and this is an easy thing to fixate on. Very Freudian really. You should see some of the crazy Propecia related ED forums, the insane corners of the internet are insane. But anti snip part of your peen off people are not in line with anti-vaxxers. The gripe they have is legit medically speaking, humans don't need to have their foreskin removed.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link