Botond173
6d ago
I don’t have half as responsible a job as JFK, and I can’t find time to golf let alone to keep a half dozen mistresses happy and on tap. Where did he find the time? Given, he was so hot, with so much social proof, that the seduction itself doesn’t seem to have been difficult, but still: keeping them all reasonably happy, keeping track of who they were, finding time to fuck them all? Where did he find the time?
Didn't he have a large number of trusted staffers?
Botond173
6d ago
I've heard the claim that US and Russian strategic bombers are currently required to be stored in a way accessible to satellite recon, as part of the verification sections of our arms control treaties.
Yes, they need to be made visible to satellites of the other party during and after the process of being eliminated in accordance with the treaty.
Botond173
6d ago
It's a bit of a stretch to say that disagreeableness is common on this site, isn't it?
Botond173
6d ago
At this point, you basically have to be doing some kind of search on every single container coming in, right?
Or alternatively just store your combat aircraft in reinforced hangars, as they all should be in the first place.
Botond173
11d ago
What exactly counts as either coercion or restriction in this particular context though?
Botond173
11d ago
The youngest living Boomers are roughly 70 years old. What's the point in trying to convince them? People generally don't change their worldview over the age of 35 anyway.
Botond173
11d ago
So Olga was just another Russian single mom? Because that's how she ends up at the end of the movie.
Botond173
11d ago
the oft-quoted statistic that the top 80% of women are contending for the top 20% of men and the bottom 80% of men are contending for the bottom 80% of women, or some similar numbers that are eerily close to the Pareto distribution.
Never have I seen the 80/20 rule stated that way in the context of the mating market anywhere. What I can surely state is that the rule was originally popularized (in the online space, that is) on Manosphere sites sometime around 2008 or 2009 (definitely not 2015). I can’t cite sources because those sites disappeared a long time ago due to various reasons (doxxing etc.). It’s a simple interpretation of the Pareto effect (i.e. that 80% of the consequences/results come from 20% of the causes/effort) applied to the mating market, and was usually stated as “20% of the men attract 80% of the women” or “20% of all men have 80% of all the sex” etc. I’m aware that those statements are rather different but that doesn’t matter because all of them assume the same Pareto effect. (Some detractors even came up with the argument that what’s actually happening is that 20% of all men engage in 80% of all sex acts with 20% of all women, which’d still be an example of the Pareto effect/distribution). Again, the fundamental intent behind the whole argument is to differentiate the current society of unrestrained female hypergamy from the bygone society of enforced monogamy, because a lot of people were unaware of this distinction, especially back then.
Botond173
12d ago
I guess what he's alluding to is that you as an upper-class Millennial woman lack the necessary insight to understand the long-term consequences the Sexual Revolution had on men's attitudes towards the mating market.
Botond173
12d ago
I think the argument here is that she, just like the Boomers in general, is unaware of the long-term consequences of the Sexual Revolution.
Botond173
12d ago
She did pose naked for magazines a couple of times.
Which is what pretty much all fashion models normally do, I guess?
Botond173
13d ago
Where is the number 22 coming from? There has never been a society where the usual age of (first) marriage was 22 for men.
Botond173
13d ago
Most importantly: not violent.
Why are you assuming this with regard to women's preferences? Also, not violent to anyone, or just not violent to her or specific people?
support a family
physical protection for his family
So it's important to be a patriarchal man except when it isn't?
Botond173
13d ago
I'd also add an alternative mundane answer:
By being unserious about relationships in general. In a society where extended adolescence and delayed adulthood are the norm it's not even out of the ordinary.
Botond173
13d ago
I imagine Prince Harry's and Edward's decisions were mainly driven by them wanting to simply spite their families whom they resented above all else.
With regard to Reagan I'm assuming you're referring to his 2nd wife? Did she have a reputation as a thot?
And with regard to Melania, are we automatically assuming that she was a thot by virtue of being a fashion model, or is there more to know about her career that I'm not aware of?
Botond173
13d ago
This in particular was addressed here for example:
The interesting thing about this study is the way that it shows how the second-greatest risk is marrying a woman with only 2 partners; the researcher's theory is that this might be the result of over-emphasized comparisons; the woman has just enough experience to realize that there is something else out there, but not enough to realize that most of it isn't an improvement.
https://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2016/06/n-matters-lot.html
The images in the post are no longer available as it's from 2016 but it doesn't matter much.
There's food for thought in the comments as well such as:
The odds doubling for the 10+ set likely is due to a woman who has that many partners has some other mental short circuit that causes her to either seek personal validation through sex, daddy issues, follow and unquestioningly accept some nonsensical ideology like slut feminism, is bipolar, or has some other issue not listed here. Where the n=2 may be a relatively normal woman who has a basis of comparison, the n=10+ is a strong indicator of some kind of mental/emotional instability.
///
I wonder if "2 prior partners" is the sexual equivalent of "just 2 beers".
///
Two theories:
1) Those may be fairly conservative religious girls who were brought up being told premarital sex and divorce was bad and held off sex to an extent, but went nuts with the divorce as an adult. But they didn't have enough time to accumulate 4-5 partners like the secular women did.
2) Women with 4-5 partners are less likely to get married AT ALL than those with 2 partners, choosing cohabitation instead. If marriage and cohabitation are considered together, those with 4-5 partners are still higher breakup risks than those with 2.
Botond173
13d ago
A man of any ambition will have projects in his (professional) life already. Multiple projects, and some of those he picks up because he has to, not because it's fun. Of course he wouldn't want his girlfriend to be yet another project. That'd be just a pain in the neck.
Botond173
13d ago
For example if we assume women also have non obese in their preferences that filters out close to 30% of those men in one fell swoop, just like it did for women.
Assuming that is incorrect though. Women don't have the same average revealed preferences regarding obesity / excess body fat in general as men do, and this applies to pretty much every other preference as well.
I've seen it mentioned by X channels that follow the war. But even if it's untrue, and why would it be, the Russian government having suspended participation in the treaty in 2023, which I wasn't aware of, renders the whole issue moot anyway. There's no good reason to leave heavy bombers out in the open.
More options
Context Copy link