@Muninn's banner p

Muninn

"Dick Laurent is dead."

2 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2024 August 23 18:38:09 UTC

Burnt out, over the hill autistic IT nerd and longtime SSC lurker

Verified Email

				

User ID: 3219

Muninn

"Dick Laurent is dead."

2 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2024 August 23 18:38:09 UTC

					

Burnt out, over the hill autistic IT nerd and longtime SSC lurker


					

User ID: 3219

Verified Email

I found a few links purporting to lead to articles on the FISA court's condemnation of the FBI over the Page warrant, but they are all dead.

Speaking as someone who followed that whole episode closely enough that I once knew the details of why footnote 389 in the IG report meant that the FBI had been lying about when they opened their various investigations against their various targets, my memory of this says that the FISA court, being involved in signing on to an obviously false FISA warrant, played the IG report straight and sent it back to DoJ. The upshot of that was that Brandon Von Grack was removed as a prosecutor from the Flynn case, a new DoJ attorney was appointed, and what do you know, suddenly pretty much every single piece of evidence that Flynn's defense alleged existed and had been seeking, and that the DoJ denied existing, was produced and the DoJ was motioning to dismiss the case. The judge denied the motion, defense sought a writ of mandamus, appeals initially granted the writ but then convened a full panel, which allowed the judge to continue the trial, etc. etc.

Oh, and Kevin Clinesmith, the guy who falsified the CIA's answer that Page was an asset, was fined $100 for his crime.

I really liked the Skiff suite when it was around and after they got bought out and closed up shop, the next closest provider that suited my needs was mailbox.org.

Dunno, I haven't read the insect series so I can't really compare the two. All I can say is that it's serviceable enough, and it's kept my interest through the first three books now, and on a premise that I wasn't so sure would do it at all to start, but then again, it's not a hard thing to get my interest and keep it.

Book of the Dead 4: Vengeance by RinoZ.

Ah, yeah, I tend to buy the books as they come out and not read the serials online. I'll get a little more specific then. The book ends right in the middle of the big battle with Keith and Drakonis on one side and To'Avalis, To'Sefit, and To'Orda on the other. In the final scene of the book, Drakonis drags himself back after killing the drake and decides to square off against To'Orda. Frustrating. Also, I agree that the series feels like it's off the rails, especially if he wants to end it soon, though it seems to me that it was at least heading off the rails in earlier books. Shame, too, I feel like 12MB has a rich and colorful world to explore, but as is often the case in these things, the series suffers from a case of making the MC too OP too quick to keep up the level of dramatic tension that the earlier books, particularly the first one, were able to have.

Okay, so I finished it yesterday and I see what you're talking about. The cliffhanger ending was frustrating to me, as they usually are. Like, ending the book at a pause in the major battle scene? Really?! But worse than that, it was getting obvious by the 2/3-3/4 mark of the book that there was nowhere near enough book left to resolve the vast majority of the new plot threads, let alone get back to some of the old ones, so yeah, as a standalone book, it's not so good, at least not in the sense that it's all buildup with no climax or resolution. Of course, the entire genre and pretty much most web serials can be guilty of this even when converted into a book, but still, a climax and conclusion to at least some of the plot seems to me to be a feature of the better written ones.

November 19th isn't too long to wait, so at least there's that.

The closest equivalent to that man that I've personally heard is Mister Trump, which I'd agree is not the same thing.

Sounds like an epic case of grifting and laziness on behalf of trad aerospace companies. Then again, I'm not really a space guy so there may well be more to it.

You've got the right of it. There's more, sure, but "more" really just boils down to the meta-boondoggle that was the space shuttle, the latest fruit of which is another iteration of graft boondoggle that is the SLS and its shuttle-derived solid rocket boosters and engines. If anything, calling that epic grifting sells it a little short, I think!

Still a cheap date over here so no worries on my end even though the whole opening with the ravens thing definitely gave me the feeling that this book would be different!

ETA: I'll be interested to see if expies of either Huginn or myself exist in the book...

Doh, I'm actually only a few chapters in, but it's certainly an odd beginning. I'll reply here in detail later this week when I've finished it!

12 Miles Below VI: The Icon of Stars by Mark Arrows.

IME the book was even freakier than the movie and I'd be most interested to read your thoughts after you finish reading it!

It kind of blows my mind that people can't get it from text alone.

Same, although TBF I'm old enough that my teenage years largely predate the world wide web, so there's definitely a generational component to that for me. The dirty stories and smutty books had all kinds of good stuff that could push a lot more of my developing buttons than the stock "three flavors of provocatively posed naked young ladies" that made up the majority of pornography back when Shelbyville was called Morganville and you couldn't get a white onion because of the war and all you could get was those big yellow ones.

Totally understandable. For me, I think the reason that I love Lost Highway so much is that so many of the themes and archetypes that it plays with and explores connect with me on a personal level. I could wax poetic about it, and still might if you're interested, but for now I'll just say that I think your first post put the finger directly on the beating heart of the movie: the characters of Renee and Alice, and more specifically, how they drove Fred and Pete each to their respective extremes.

As you can probably tell, Lost Highway is my favorite David Lynch film, although TBF I've really never given Mulholland Drive its due and I really need to see it again and on the big screen before I'll feel like I've done that. Anyway, a nearby theater did a David Lynch Retrospective after his death earlier this year and I took the opportunity to see Lost Highway again on the big screen. Like you, I hadn't seen it in decades, and despite agreeing with just about everything you say, the entire movie just clicked for me from start to finish. Each and every scene, and in fact each and every beat of the movie felt sublime, flowing inexorably into the next one and the next one, ultimately building to its intense climax and conclusion. It's like I had that same spellbound feeling that you did when Patricia Arquette was onscreen except I experienced it for the entire movie. I left the theater that night feeling like I had fully grokked the film itself for the first time, almost three decades after initially seeing it in the theater. That being the case, I'd quibble a bit about whether or not Lynch pulled off what he wanted to pull of in Lost Highway, because I think he did, and say instead that the issues that you point out are all genuine and ultimately make it much less accessible than a lot of his other work.

Many people with this condition incorrectly label themselves with a bunch of other stuff that may or may not be real but generally doesn't apply to them.

Just chiming in to note that I've personally heard mental health professionals admit to incorrectly diagnosing borderlines as well, ostensibly so that they could receive mental health services that explicitly excluded borderlines from eligibility in their guidelines. I strongly suspect that several percentage points of bipolars are misdiagnosed borderlines.

Interesting. After discovering that One Battle After Another was based on Vineland, I've wanted to read it to get a feel for the source material, all the more so since I made my way through Gravity's Rainbow and well remember the sense of,"what in the actual fuck did I just read," stupefied awe that I felt afterwards. I kinda want to read it both less and more at the same time after that description!

Working Class (SC Marva Collins Book 2) by Nathan Lowell.

I grew up in the Los Angeles area during the best time to grow up there (I might make a top level post about this some time) and it is essentially unrecognizable.

Please do, I would love to read that!

So the book is Marine! The Life of Chesty Puller, but being a biography of Puller, there isn't anything else to explain Willoughby's motives at all. There might be more insight to be had from a good bio of MacArthur on that front.

Reminds me of a bit from back when I read a biography of Lewis "Chesty" Puller. General C.A. Willoughby, MacArthur's intelligence chief, had come to X Corps HQ in Wonsan from Tokyo, along with his staff. Evidently, when Willoughby asked General Almond how things were, Almond told him about the seventh division fighting the Chinese, and that both sides had taken casualties, to which Willoughby replied, "that's another goddamn Marine lie." Almond promptly led him out to the POW stockade and showed him around 80 Chinese POWs that the 7th had captured. Willoughby reportedly departed without saying another word and that evening, the situation map from Tokyo that showed detailed positions of the troops suddenly showed 500,000 Chinese troops scattered around the map. It was clear from Puller's point of view that the issue was political. Quoth Chesty:

Now that's the fastest damned troop movement in the history of the world, gentlemen. You'll never see another such. And don't forget this lesson: Tokyo wouldn't admit that we had Chinese fighting us even after the Eight Army was in flight, because some damned staff officers hundreds of miles away willed it to be so. You can't will anything in war.

Book of the Dead 3: Masquerade by RinoZ. Pretty confident that #4 will be up next on my reading list.

Sticking strictly to the antipsychotics, it's more that the meds help, but can only ease the symptoms and not actually rid most folks entirely of schizophrenia when they take them. If you've watched Reservation Dogs, the character of Maximus is a good example there. He knows he needs his medication when he's on it, and he tries to take it regularly, but he forgets sometimes and starts to spiral until his behavior catches up with him or he recognizes that he needs help. Either way, he gets treatment and can hold down his life again.

When it comes to not even believing that medication is needed, and with the caveat that I'm not a psychiatrist, etc. etc., my impression based on what I've seen is that for the most part is that there's a host of different justifications for that thinking, but the practicalities tend to boil down to a either a lack of insight or awareness that their behavior is even problematic in the first place, and/or an attachment to their particular flavor of schizophrenic ideation. On top of that, the side effects of antipsychotics tend to suck, too. More generally, kinda like how Hassan has the rigid belief that police officers want to have (homosexual) sex with him, in his world the police wanting to have sex with him is the problem, medication's got nothing to do with it! Or in my example above, of course the unaccompanied kids are in danger, there's no adult present to look after them! If the police were doing their jobs, they'd be either looking after the kids themselves, or going after the parents of the kids for not looking after their own!

Although I'm IT, I happen to work in the mental health field, and we see a lot of Hassans on a semi-regular basis. I get the feeling that working with them would be extremely difficult, just because it'd be so fucking heartbreaking. I mean, I'd want to do everything I could for him, and I'd feel terrible that bare bones basics like medication management and linking him to help and encouraging him to use it would be the best that I could do for him, and that he probably wouldn't take advantage of any of the help because of the paranoia. It seems like bad choices all the way down when it comes to the question of when should these individuals lose their rights. I'm firmly on record as saying that the SC has erred on the side of turning the mental health problem into a law enforcement problem with the current doctrine of imminent danger of harm to self or others or chronic inability to care for self, but I also have no illusions that widespread institutionalization was worse. The reality of the law being a blunt instrument here really hits home with frequent flyer clients like the lady who is consistently hospitalized for abducting children off the streets which in her mind is for their own safety, treated with medication, then released, whereupon she promptly stops taking her meds, "because she doesn't need them," then goes back to her delusions and tries to protect another kid and starts the cycle all over again.

And the big kicker in all of this is that your example of Hassan is a great one in the sense that he seems to code to the classic, "would probably never even hurt a fly unless he is triggered in a highly specific fashion," sort of situation, which is, of course, the vast majority of schizophrenics. I know, I know, it's very trope-y to be busting out the, "less violent than normies," meme here but the other piece of this for me is that from what I've seen, the violent mentally ill throw many more red flags than just trying to protect themselves. Threats of violence and violent or even homicidal ideation are common and even then, the biggest single red flag is that they've been violent in the past, not that they threaten violence or fantasize about it. I'm sure this, in part, is why having a plan to harm someone or oneself is a prerequisite for involuntary commitment, lest we start locking folks up left and right for wanting to hurt or kill an antagonist or themselves.

Anyway, I really appreciate this post because it brings home the reality that absent a major breakthrough, schizophrenia in particular will remain a particularly poor fit for the lens of the culture wars. Even if we go with the metaphor of the spectrum for mental illness, there's a clear-cut difference between the Jared Loughners and the Lee Harvey Oswalds.

This is true to an extent, but you've already got the vocabulary to get started. Basic things like sweet, sour, chocolate, fruity, spicy, nutty, earthy, and even smoky will probably be noticeable to you right away. As you get into the taste of your coffee, you'll notice more and more details, and be able to get more specific. Tart and sour resolves to something citrus-y. That nutty flavor tastes a little like pecan. That one sip reminds you of a nibble of really dark chocolate as the bitterness fades and the chocolate really opens up in your palate. And doggone if that one doesn't taste like black tea or green tea here and there. I've uploaded a coffee wheel image for your reference.

More than the caffeine, this is the hook that coffee set for me. I don't always get every flavor advertised in the particular bean but it's there so consistently that I'm confident that the flavor is there as long as I roast it right, which of course is half the fun, except when I'm consistently getting savory out of my beans. That means that it's time for me to clean my roaster!

/images/17592353446912394.webp