zeke5123a
7hr ago
I find the substack article to be not very good either. It makes a claim that rape gangs are unlikely because of the very few number of defendants. But that was part of the whole scandal (ie authorities kept looking the other way).
zeke5123a
8hr ago
I think the other poster was taking the piss about the misspelling of Lowe’s name.
zeke5123a
8hr ago
A rape dog in the context of a rape gang seems less absurd compared to a rape dog in the context of a military agency.
zeke5123a
8hr ago
Bostock was not logical. The question is what did the words of the civil rights law mean (not quite the same as intent). It seems obviously clear that in the 1960s the words had a specific meaning and we then used a meaning in the 2020s to read into the historic statutes a specific requirement.
Stated differently, nobody but nobody would have believed in the 60s that the law passed created Bostock. Once you accept that, you have to believe that the meaning of law can change overtime.
zeke5123a
8hr ago
Citing employers free association rights are rich when they will get sued by the government for creating a hostile work environment if they for example didn’t want trans.
zeke5123a
8hr ago
There is no gender/sex distinction. Famously, Matt Walsh asked “what is a woman?”. Self ID doesn’t get you there because unless you have a platonic form there is no way one can in fact identify as a woman (what is someone identifying with if there is no form). So the only possible coherence is to look at the platonic form of a female and see if women maps onto it.
But then trans folks are basically claiming that doing certain activities are the defining form of being a woman (again if there is any coherence to trans ideology — one could say there are many ways to be a woman but trans people need there to be a platonic form). And by doing so, by saying “women are X, Y, and Z” trans folks are basically telling a bunch of females that they actually aren’t a woman (unlike the trans “woman” who is male). That is patently ridiculous. No, the woman who was born with women’s characteristics shouldn’t be told she isnt a woman by a confused man. Being a woman (based on sex) is easily defined and generally has worked for society for ages; yes there are extreme edge cases but far fewer than if the trans incoherence was adopted.
So even if you take the weak form of trans claims, they still fall apart into incoherent delusions since the only way to make any sense of gender is by tying it in to sex and therefore breaking the alleged binary.
zeke5123a
3d ago
There were massively rallies in support of Gaza around the world right after it happened including in NY. I don’t know what the other poster is on about.
zeke5123a
4d ago
So let’s say you are designing an immigration system. Let’s say you want some small amount of immigration but a lot of people are coming to your country.
Are you going to make decisions based on limited info and discriminate against the group who commit crimes at massive rates or will you “treat everyone like an individual?”
zeke5123a
5d ago
Sure. That’s all well and good. But importantly most of the grooming gangs weren’t full of white people. And yes, white people act terrible. But the rape gangs were specifically racially and religiously homogenous. We shouldn’t bury our heads to this.
zeke5123a
5d ago
Allegedly, the origins of Cosa Nostra (though almost certainly untrue) was when a French sergeant tried to rape a young married Sicilian woman. Her husband killed the French and then the mafia protected the husband from the occupying French.
zeke5123a
5d ago
A few thoughts:
-
It is assumed that Rotherham is the most prolific. The report talks about London and how the mayor there has denied any such problem in London while more evidence is coming out. Is it possible that other areas were simply more tight lipped than Rotherham?
-
It seems with larger populations, it would be easier to “hide.” Not sure how this cuts (ie maybe larger amount but smaller per capita or larger amounts and larger per capita because the police have other things to worry about like people tweeting).
-
Who did the investigation I. Those other towns? Was it “I investigated myself and turns out I did okay?”
zeke5123a
5d ago
I loathe immigration. When I first heard 250k, my reaction was “is that number real.” Why would someone’s first reaction be “Catholic schools murdered a bunch of native Americans?”
zeke5123a
5d ago
Farage will welch. When push comes to shove, Nigel won’t do what’s necessary to re migrate the population. He is mOre cowardly (if possible) than Trump. I think Lowe actually would, notwithstanding media howling, affect real re migration. Hell a couple of Nigel’s key members are the architects of the migration replacement. Nigel is offended by people like Tommy Robinson. He backed off his rage comment re Henry Novak.
I’m hoping that restore beats out reform somehow in the Makersfield election at which point there would be preference cascade.
zeke5123a
5d ago
The problem here isn’t this his office doesn’t think a position lacks support. The problem is that his office is prejudiced against certain outcomes and is using “error” as a backdoor to change those outcomes.
zeke5123a
5d ago
Farage seemingly still supports Muslims in the UK as a class. He is okay with a multi cultural society as long as it remains slightly British slightly longer.
zeke5123a
6d ago
We could look at things like terrorist attacks in the last fifty years. Or we could look at things like the UK where Muslims end up in large amounts.
zeke5123a
6d ago
None of that adds up to “more dangerous than Islam”. All you have done is shown a threat; not a relative threat.
It is common knowledge that women would fuck dogs for Dubai elite. I think it’s the demeaning attitude
More options
Context Copy link