The scheme is basically it will be a private grocery store whose land costs are covered by the government and in response they must offer certain items 30% discounted.
So the operator has an incentive to avoid shop lifters. But the operator also has an incentive to minimize the supply of the 30% discounted items.
I think there was zero chance of winning even if the construction was perfect.
Assumes facts not in evidence. The line prosecutors are likely all strongly anti Trump or think it’s a waste of time focusing on a relatively low level crime. The only person with skin in the game is the AUSA. So on the one hand her office is pissed at her and the judge is giving her grief and on the other hand her boss wants her to prosecute. She also knows she will lose the court regardless of the evidence given the jury pool.
It is a tough situation for the AUSA and because of that the paragraph you quote isnt necessarily indicative. If you read the motion, the paragraph you posted is incorrect. All the additional information provided is that at least some of the damage is attributed to poor construction. But the evidence is also consistent with vandals making it worse.
You can claim the prior portion of the motion was wrong but it means some of the motion is wrong. I would wager the evidence was described correctly and the conclusion is wrong.
Except it was described as being violent. Perhaps there was something loose but violently pulling the liner would make it worse.
Did you read the motion? I just don’t see how the fact that there were issues with the construction means the multiple eye witness accounts were incorrect.
That seems like a really bad motion. Literally the evidence is “there were construction problems and therefore the multiple first hand witnesses who saw this person doing damage isn’t true.”
I find it amusing you cite privatizing ATC as proof when other countries have private ATC and it seems to function just fine. But color me shocked that a union sticks up for unions.
The other thing that annoys me about crim pro is that it inevitably protects the rights of guilty but not of the innocent. So the police violate your rights but don’t find evidence because you didn’t commit the crime? Sucks to suck. But they do the seem and find evidence you are guilty? Excluded.
In both situations, the police and the department (via vicarious liability) ought to be civilly liable. But evidence ought not be excluded.
Of course, this can create an incentive for police to trample rights viewing any civil suit as a cost of doing business. Perhaps that can be solved via exponentially growing settlements.
If you are the private operator, you have a strong incentive to ensure there are frequently shortages with respect to the 30% discounted items.
Your reaction was mine as well. I thought “refreshing something not about the je….awe shucks”
Is it respect for authority or more about conformity?
How is that measured and shouldn’t we measure by state
Are we sure that’s still true
American culture is radically different since we’ve imported tens of millions of foreigners into the country with limited assimilation.
We just saw during the pandemic that Americans cower to fear over the smallest of things and will despite the outgroup.
I don’t know why but i read retarded kid as retard king. Couldn’t stop laughing
Leftist seem to believe colonization is great for white homelands. So they aren’t anti colonization—they are anti white (or perhaps more charitably anti western).
I find it interesting that Webb was not mad that he mis colored her but mad about the concept. She didn’t seem to grok that he was upset about her concept.
Yep. Before it gets really hot, I always take away my wife’s shoes. Really turns her on. /s
Somewhat infamously the house Dems shouted down a resolution to condemn the killing of Kirk.
Local democrats called it the summer of love until there were multiple murders so…yeah they don’t get much credit.
3 weeks!! Seems to counter your argument
I wonder if just once the response was brutal if that would stop the blitz. That is, it’s one thing to cosplay when it costs you nothing. It’s another when you could be maimed.
Do we know why the rape charges were dropped? Was there evidence the perps didn’t commit the crime?
How do you explain a positive “popcorn gap?”
Family business
- Prev
- Next

Yep
More options
Context Copy link