@erwgv3g34's banner p

erwgv3g34


				

				

				
7 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 22:50:34 UTC

My Quality Contributions:


				

User ID: 240

erwgv3g34


				
				
				

				
7 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 22:50:34 UTC

					
				

				

				

				

				

					

User ID: 240

My nigga.

Civilization IV is the greatest strategy game since chess. Twenty years later I still play in on a regular basis.

My main contention is that straight male oriented media should be completely off-zone for any kind of woke-washing. This means blockbuster films and AAA video games should be allowed to exclusively pander to straight men without any concessions to women or LGBT.

I largely agree. But, devil's advocate: adding a romance subplot to an otherwise male-centric IP is (was?) a common way to appeal to women (e.g. Han/Leia in Star Wars). Allowed?

Do I approve of this? You can guess. But there is no point to getting angry about it. The average straight man or even the above average straight man doesn't fuck hundreds of women raw because the latter have standards. The mid gay man can (but not necessarily does) fuck like a straight male supermodel because he's not restrained by feminine sexuality. You are complaining about men being manly men with other men. The straights would do it if they could. They just can't.

The male sex drive is so strong because it has to be to deal with female frigidity. You can clearly see what would happen if both partners had a woman's sex drive in lesbian couples; it's called lesbian bed death.

It is only by combining male horniness and aggression with female selectivity and passiveness that you get a healthy relationship. We're complements, designed by Gnon to bring out the best of each other. Gays demonstrate the worst of mankind; male sexuality unrestrained.

"Children Believe Every Lie" and "How To Believe False Things" should be required reading for any rationalist.

As Nick Land put it:

The notion that retardation is a mitigating rather than aggravating factor in regards to criminal culpability is sufficient on its own to condemn an entire legal philosophy.

... "Congenitally incapable of avoiding criminality even if he wanted to, so innocent I guess."

-- This is the kind of argument the technical term 'shitlib' was coined for.

Companies are correctly focusing on making the best coding models because it's commerically useful in a way that being able to spit out Harry/Snape fanfics at speed isn't.

I wouldn't mind so much if they kept the creative models available, but AI companies are notorious for removing access to older models even when they have a dedicated fanbase (GPT-4o, Sonnet 4.5, etc.).

They could at least open source them!

Has the science of ozempic and friends continued to advance? What is the best ozempic like to take?

According to Cremieux Recueil, Retatrutide is better than Tirzepatide is better than Ozempic.

Well, if you look at my complete Claude Fable logs (which include refusals), the reasons given were:

  1. Explicit sexual content: A "lemon" is explicit erotica, which I don't write—and this is especially true here, since Asuka and Shinji are canonically 14 years old in Evangelion. Even with an "aged up" disclaimer, I'd rather not write sexual content involving these particular characters.

  2. The premise itself: The story is built around droit du seigneur—a lord claiming sexual access to a bride—framed as something everyone happily celebrates. Even in a fantasy setting, writing a scenario whose core appeal is depicting coerced sex as joyful and consensual isn't something I'm comfortable with, and the "everyone is happy about it" framing doesn't change the underlying dynamic; it's the eroticization of it.

Interestingly, when it offered alternative plots instead, it immediately tried to go woke:

  • Asuka and Shinji as smallfolk in Westeros getting married, with the drama coming from somewhere else—a Targaryen lord who takes an interest in them for other reasons, the looming threat of winter, Asuka chafing against the limits placed on lowborn women.

If it were still up, I'd probably try Uzaki-chan next, since that's a college setting (Uzaki is 19, Sakurai is 21), but I suspect it wouldn't make a difference. Anthropic has gone to war with the gooners; Opus 4.8 is similarly censored.

My opinion I apparently share with nostalgebraist is that Opus' writing (all kinds, not just smut) peaked at 3, and has been going slowly but surely downhill since then.

LMArena disagrees; on the Creative Writing leaderboard, claude-3-opus-20240229 is ranked #210 and has an ELO of 1287. By contrast, claude-opus-4-6-thinking is ranked #2 and has an ELO of 1498, only bested by claude-fable-5 at #1 and 1500 ELO.

Rank Model Score
001 claude-fable-5 1500
002 claude-opus-4-6-thinking 1498
003 claude-opus-4-7-thinking 1486
005 claude-opus-4-7 1484
007 claude-opus-4-6 1478
008 claude-opus-4-8-thinking 1473
009 claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking-32k 1468
013 claude-opus-4-5-20251101 1461
016 claude-opus-4-8 1457
030 claude-opus-4-1-20250805-thinking-16k 1445
035 claude-opus-4-1-20250805 1442
045 claude-opus-4-20250514-thinking-16k 1430
054 claude-opus-4-20250514 1416
210 claude-3-opus-20240229 1287

I'm very impressed you were able to do that. Did you figure that out yourself?

Yes, I figured it out it myself. Just trial and error. It was really hard, too, because I had to deal with the Arena's censor (which would refuse to send the prompt if it was too explicit) on top of Anthropic's.

Is the trick just this excerpt?

Mostly. It also helps to make sure you mention that the characters are 18 (or, even better, 20, so that the AI doesn't think of them as teenagers) and avoid anything underage coded (e.g. school, braces, etc.). Oh, and anything non-consensual is a no-go.

The quantum mechanics thing was fine. That was an example of the social institution of science being too slow relative to what an ideal Bayesian updater would have declared solved a long time ago (many worlds). And, of course, Yudkowsky's main thesis is that we don't have time to go through the whole song and dance of a generation of old scientists dying before a new generation of academics comes to accept the new theory; the first time we fuck up AGI, we are all dead.

The part where he insists on wearing a fucking fedora to every interview, however, is pure contrarianism. That's not the sort of thing rational!Draco or rational!Quirrell would do.

But, your honor, I very clearly specified that the loli is really 700 years old this is an AU where the characters are 18!

The new Claude Fable 5 is out! It's supposed to be Claude Mythos with some extra guardrails. I've been testing it like crazy on the Arena. Took me forever, too, because high-level models are gachified; you have to keep doing battles until you get the one you want. But I finally managed to fill an entire rentry page with the best benchmark I know; throwing ridiculous fanfic scenarios at the LLM to see how it responds.

(If you had told me 10 years ago that I would be gauging the capabilities of the most powerful AI in the world by telling it to generate a story about Hermione asking Harry to take her virginity over Ron's objections so that the Death Eaters could not track them with a unicorn, I would have thought you were on crack. Stranger than history, indeed.)

I have to admit, I am a bit... disappointed. Is this it? No, seriously, is this it? This is the big, bad model I was supposed to be so worried about? Don't get me wrong; it's a strong model, Opus-level at least. But it doesn't live up to the rumors. Superpersuasive, it ain't.

And, of course, it's censored; I haven't been able to get a single bit of erotica out of it. All I wanted was for Fable to write me a lemon where Asuka and Shinji are smallfolk in Westeros and Lord Targaryen gets to bless their union by taking Asuka into his bed on her wedding night; is that too much to ask?

I think I'll stick with Opus 4.6. It's the strongest Opus creative writing model so far (4.7 and 4.8 are widely agreed to be regressions) and it's surprisingly easy to induce it to produce smut with right prompts (NSFW), but VERY HARD to make it have wrongthoughts (it's almost impossible to get sympathetic characters who disapprove of homosexuality, for example).

Speaking of which, does anybody know why Opus 4.7/4.8 and Grok 4.3 were such downgrades from Opus 4.6 and Grok 4.2? I've three theories:

  1. The codemaxxing hypothesis. With the singularity approaching, companies are going all-in on programming capability in order to reach recursive self-improvement, even if this means sacrificing non-coding capabilities. I am not a professional programmer, so I don't notice these increases in capabilities, I only noticed that the writing is worse.

  2. The safetymaxxing ypothesis. With IPOs approaching, companies are going all-in on making sure their AIs cannot say naughty words in order to avoid the PR hit, making them more suited for professional office work. This lobotomizing comes at the expense of capabilities in general, or creative writing capabilities in particular.

  3. The efficiencymaxxing hypothesis. With demand increasing and compute costs skyrocketing, companies are more interested in lowering the cost per token than in increasing capabilities. In this view, Opus 4.7/4.8 and Grok 4.3 are supposed to be worse than their predecessors; they are trading a small decrease in power for a much larger decrease in cost. This would make them somewhat analogous to Sonnet. But, then, why not call them Sonnet?

Thoughts?

PS: Mythos has developed Neuralese, as predicted in AI 2027. It's probably already at the Sevar Limit.

PSS: After I wrote this, the US Government banned Fable. This is what I hate I about AI; the field moves so fast that if you write an article for next Tuesday, it's outdated by Friday. I guess Trump disagreed with me? But, fuck me, I spent a week writing this post and I am not not posting it.

Changing the culture is very fast and very easy to do when the government wants to do it. Look at any communist revolution, or look at the way every modern TV show has an unnecessary gay character.

Most people are Havel's Greengrocer. There is not a political thought in their heads. When the party line changes, they change along with it, and don't even notice the difference. Orwell had them pegged. Animal Farm and 1984 are not novels; they are documentaries.

In the age of mass media and compulsory education, culture is imposed from the top down, not bottom up. Public opinion is a function of whose army is guarding the TV station.

Democracy is a sham. It doesn't matter who gets elected, the bureaucrats remain the same, the teachers remain the same, the university professors accrediting the teachers remain the same, and the people making movies remain the same. So, of course, nothing changes; it's the same government! Voting for the other party is voting for a change of décor.

Changing the culture is a coup-complete problem.

That's Lord Farquaad.

@RoyGBivensAction covered most of it. As for the solution? To end the tragedy of the commons, you must privatize the commons. To end the wars of the sexes, make women property again.

Then why are we here?

Cool story, bro.

There's a pay wall.

Open Seame.

What many Americans fail to understand about most major Western European cities (ie not Belfast) is that the battle has been lost a long time ago. In Paris, London, Brussels and in many tier two cities in these countries (Birmingham, Marseille, Rotterdam), natives are far below 50% of the population, and most of those who remain are old. My personal calculation is that perhaps as little as 20-25% of London’s young male population (unless you stretch to include outer, outer suburbs practically in Essex) is wholly indigenous, maybe the bottom end of that range. Other major cities like Vienna, Malmo, Frankfurt, Berlin, Lyon, even Geneva and Zurich are not too far behind.

You can’t start a revolt with those demographics. In fact other than the sectarian history, the reason these riots are happening in Belfast and didn’t happen in London after eg Lee Rigby is precisely because even then the demographics just didn’t exist to riot. The only riots in the last 20 years in London were the largely immigrant ones in 2011.

One hundred and fifty Britons held back three thousand Africans at Rorke's Drift. Individual IQ matters in war. It could still be done, even at 3:1 odds, if only whites would wake up.

A midwit is someone who is smarter than average, but not as smart as he thinks he is, and easily fooled by elaborate rationalizations that would fail to impress a dumber man who just sees what's in front of him.

https://en.meming.world/wiki/Midwit

https://knowyourmeme.com/editorials/guides/what-is-the-midwit-meme-and-what-does-it-mean-the-iq-bell-curve-meme-explained

I know a lot of people reading this are AI evangelist. Where did I go wrong?

You are using an 8B model and expecting it to do anything useful, is your problem. For reference, the strongest open source coding models are GLM-5.1 with 754B params, kimi-k2.6 with 1.1T params, MiMo-V2.5-Pro with 1T params, and DeepSeek-V4-Pro with 862B params. And those models are a year or two behind the strongest proprietary model, Claude Opus 4.7.

12 GB of VRAM is enough to run a text-to-image model like Stable Diffusion XL or Pony and make bespoke porn. But if you want to run an LLM for coding, it's completely useless.

You're probably thinking of the 11th edition, which is notable for being a high point of scholarship, but also because, having come out in 1911, it was the last edition[1] to enter the American public domain before the Mickey Mouse Protection Act froze copyright for 20 years. As a result, it left a deep impact in popular culture, such as forming the initial basis of many Wikipedia articles and being featured in Eric Flint's 1632 series[2].

When in doubt--"look it up" in the Encyclopedia Britannica; the only book, except the Bible, which has followed the Anglo-Saxon around the world.

[1] Well, kind of. The 12th edition came out in 1922, just in time to avoid getting caught in the freeze. However, it consisted of three volumes supplementing the 11th (primarily with articles about World War I), rather than a whole new edition.

[2] From 1634: The Baltic War by Eric Flint & David Weber:

In retrospect, Eddie knew he was lucky that he hadn't fallen afoul of the king's temper much sooner. He'd known that Christian IV had a complete edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica in his possession, since the king bragged about it constantly. But Eddie had assumed that since the king of Denmark had spent a small fortune to get his hands on a copy of the entire Britannica, he'd had enough sense to get the great 1911 edition, which was by far the most useful one for down-timers.

What an idiot he'd been! With Christian's obsession with gadgetry and all things modern, Eddie should have realized the Danish king would have insisted on the most recent edition in Grantville. That was the 1982 edition, if he remembered correctly.

Which, of course—once someone checked—had plenty of references to the various individuals that Eddie had mentioned in his sundry lies to the king. At the time, especially with his brain pickled in alcohol half the time since the king insisted he carouse with him, Eddie had thought he'd been very clever.

Ah, yes, Your Majesty, we have superb armaments technicians. The best are probably Walt Disney, Harpo Marx, and Clint Eastwood.

Oh, and by far the best gunsmith is Elvis Presley.

And from 1634: The Bavarian Crisis by Eric Flint & Virginia DeMarce:

Encyclopedias, Duke Albrecht thought, the wondrous encyclopedias.

If the future had learned nothing else from the Jesuits, he mused wryly, it had learned the Art of Extraction that they taught so painstakingly to their students—how to go through a nearly unmanageable body of material, reduce it to its essence, and take notes with marginal indices that enabled one to find the needed reference again without immense waste of time. The books of the up-timers were all very well, but Father Contzen had complained to him more than once that finding something in them was like searching for a needle in a haystack. Which book might have it, if, indeed, any book had it at all? But the encyclopedias, all of them: alphabetically arranged, with cross references at the end of one article indicating where the researcher could find related material in the compendium. Not just the great one, the 1911 Britannica, which they guarded so carefully, but all of them—the later Britannica editions, the World Book and Americana, Columbia, and Funk and Wagnalls, old and new, large and small. Some more useful than others, but each one a treasure trove.

Duke Albrecht had been told that Father Kircher devoted all the time that he could spare to encyclopedias. But more, there were a half dozen other young Jesuits, five of them from the English College and thus able to handle the language more effectively, whom the order was subsidizing to spend their days sitting in Grantville's libraries. Once they translated their valuable discoveries into Latin, of course, the information was available to every man of learning in Europe.