That the IDF released audio of Hamas operatives saying it was from Islamic Jihad, but the audio is clearly faked with bad Palestinian accents and crappy acting. Why do you think the IDF would release obviously doctored audio?
Pure hypothetical, say it is fake. Midwit PCM types? I see this all the time with lawyers, they throw everything including the kitchen sink. "Ok... that makes sense and that makes sense and that's pure bullshit." The court throws out the bullshit, but if it had snuck through instant win or padding the case.
Normal person: "You have established yourself as a liar, so I should toss out everything else you say."
Midwit lawyers/judges: "This is just a debate game, fair play."
Take this thread: https://twitter.com/Nrg8000/status/1714535497958334678
Vast majority is "definitely not Israel". Then... but why did they crop the crater out of the photos? The Crater it seems clearly too small.
https://twitter.com/Nrg8000/status/1714600473104404966
Midwit bureaucrat: "Let's pad just how much our enemies it was."
Perhaps another example is the 40 beheaded babies. Maybe it's 2 babies beheaded a dozen killed but just needed to make the story a bit more tragic.
The sound of the hospital blast is identical to a JDAM missile sound
"JDAM missile" isn't a thing, JDAM is a guidance package attached to a bomb.
zoink
1yr ago
The post below seems correct that you can always find a person in a group with wrong opinions to smear.
The difference is that on the right (by Marxist parlance) Nazis don't get tenure at our most prestigious universities. Marxists do.
zoink
1yr ago
My hypothesis is that disagreement is not down to Dunbar’s number but down to a widespread suspicion that most economic theory is bunk.
Which stems from? That would be an actual response to OP's post.
zoink
1yr ago
it seems to be a classic case of applying economic theory and then assuming that everyone is a moron for not going along with your conclusions, rather than disagreeing with your analysis.
The whole point of the post is discussing why people disagree with one of the most agreed upon concepts (rent control is bad) in economics...
Democrat intellectuals are completely unpalatable to the general public. They have to have plausible deniability when it comes to the Marxists who hate the United States and want to teach preschoolers sex-ed. The media can tell you not to believe your lying eyes when it comes to schools putting strap-on-sucking books in libraries, but a presidential candidate would be hard to run cover for.
zoink
1yr ago
The sedevacantist group with ties to the mafia?
It's all Greek... er I mean Latin to me.
Yes, sedevacantist. He did go in to that, but not mafia, gonna have to look in to that one.
- a sedevacantist, particularly from out-there hardliners like the CMRI, would go there and 2) any regular Latin mass goer would find lots of open carry shocking.
And based on my culture waring these surprised me as well. I figured he'd hate a group like SPXX with almost more passion than the Holy See. Also I ribbed him about being surprised at open carry because his church is in an area of the country nationally famous for open carry. He said only like three guys in his congregation open carry. He's fresh moved there and is a Cali boy so I'm thinking he's still learning the ropes.
zoink
1yr ago
I did a Scandinavia trip (every capital) this time last year and virtually the only mask I saw were on Americans and Asians. Was going to do the Helsinki to Stockholm boat but did Tallinn to Stockholm instead. Good time.
My wife and I are third-generation alumni of the same evangelical school. That's probably the primary purpose of non-elite religious schools. My father pursued a degree and went on to manage restaurants, and her dad was a baker. Both were very successful in their careers, and one could argue that they could have achieved that without a degree. Nevertheless, they cherished the sense of community and connections they gained from the school, becoming leaders in it. While my parents covered my entire tuition, hers covered half. They both loved that school. Nowadays, it costs well over 100k for a mediocre education, and the administration seems to have forgotten that the main point was to find a life partner. Personally, I knew the reason I was going there - it was free - but I couldn't understand why other kids were plunging into debt and not even coming out with a spouse. The state school was much cheaper, and, in my opinion, the girls were more attractive.
Furthermore, from the perspective of many parents, the theology professors at this mediocre academic school seem to turn about a quarter of the students into atheists. So, what exactly is the niche that this school is trying to fill? As far as I know, institutions like Liberty and College of the Ozarks are doing just fine.
Random story time! This is one of the first times I've encountered SSPX since my brother-in-law's wedding. His cousin joined CMRI a few years ago and came down for a wedding. He attended an SSPX for the Latin mass and was shocked to see half the congregation openly carrying firearms. Our families are both very evangelical Protestant, and as a recent convert, he is fervent about informing us that we're all destined for hell. Personally, that's never bothered me much. I mean, why should I care if another religion thinks I'm going to hell? I certainly don't believe I'm heading there, at least not for the reasons they believe.
Of course, this caused some tension within the family. What stood out, even more, was when he admitted that if he had his way, the US would be a theocracy, and all other religions or denominations would be banned from public practice. I pointed out that after enjoying the freedom to practice and grow his religion under the Protestant commitment to religious freedom, he would then take that very right away from Protestants. It seemed like an odd thing for a lawyer not to have considered before.
zoink
1yr ago
there are many more who use that as an excuse for the real goal of de-electrification.
Like some sort of primitivists? I go with mistake theory, I think it's more that leftism is virtually ignorant of the concept of trade offs. Any negatives are because of a lack of will; just get the right people in power and spend money and we can have zero carbon energy for our dense, walkable, clean, safe, cities.
Which there was just had an announcement on: https://fervoenergy.com/fervo-energy-announces-technology-breakthrough-in-next-generation-geothermal/
Before I start let me preface with I love my wife, none of the following is malicious and I don't think these things are fully conscious. I do know women who are better at finances then their husbands. So people don't think she is a bum she came in to the relationship with about 200k of equity in a house, she brags to everyone how awesome I am with finances, she likes to help on major projects around the house or organize things while I'm working on the vehicles, and I would be 100% fine being the breadwinner if she decided to be a stay at home mom.
She struggles mentally keeping track of cash flows and balances. Mostly it's little things that aren't a big deal. Like when we were dating we went to Costco, spent about $100 dollars, and I had forgotten my wallet. While walking to the car she reminded me to transfer her half the bill. During that period in our relationship I had regularly covered full shopping runs and I had been picking up the tab of our weekly dates to the tune of $75-$100 a week. One time she saw the bill and was shocked that that's how much we'd been spending. A few months before I'd floated her $8k to get her into grad school before the student loans came in.
When we got married we agreed to combine finances but didn't close her bank account because there were some bills tied to it and so she could have some autonomy. The one time I put up some resistance was when she wanted a couple grand because she felt she'd spent thousands more than me on the wedding and transferring her a couple grand would be fair. This was hard for me because it meant I was going to have to dip in to the emergency fund for the first time in years. She suggested we make a spreadsheet only to find that I'd spent thousands more than her. She polished off her $20k inheritance before we got married because she wanted to have some fun before the wedding saying "it was her money" (I had never asked for justification or protested).
She recently suggested that we should follow Dave Ramsey and become debt free by paying off $60k in student loans from a couple failed attempts at graduate degrees by liquidating the emergency fund and the rest of the crypto, all of which I had accumulated before we started dating. She recently talked about how after kids she wants some cosmetic surgery. I remarked that was going to take awhile to save up for, and she said not to worry she'd save up the money. Apart from the inheritance her cash flow has been negative for years and I don't see how that's going to change. She has lamented how she is doing a disproportionate share of the housework, I told her to wait until I get home and I'll help. She doesn't like it being dirty in the 2 to 4 hour difference between when she gets off work and I get off work. I also leave for work an hour and a half before she does.
I usually describe this as women's economic floor is higher than men. I think there is institutional misandry and racism against white and Asian men in at least the United States. However, I believe it's still and will remain relatively "easy" to set a solid floor as a man. See the Success Sequence: "get at least a high school education, work full time, and marry before having children. Among Millennials who followed this sequence, 97% are not poor when they reach adulthood." Even if institutional racism and misandry increase it's far more productive to spend one's time improving oneself than any other way of fighting the racism and misandry.
The crass way of saying it is: "Leave external locus of control to women."
Now conscription... if that comes back...
zoink
1yr ago
I am 95% confident that in 30 years I'll be happy I had as many healthy kids as possible. The issue is that we are in our mid 30's so time is on on our side. My brother in law wanted 6 then his second wrecked him and my sister (who is tough) so I'm 70% confident that I could push through 4 which I think is the max we could safely push to at our ages and handle the miseries that will come with having 3-4 young kids. I think it will mostly be on my wife. I'll need to take on a lot of responsibility and cut back on my frugal desires to keep her on board. I think I'd rather have more kids then a few extra hundred grand at retirement.
zoink
1yr ago
A bunch of us decided to get knocked up around the same time. We're thinking rotating date nights where we unload the kids on one couple. Though 6-9 months might be a little young for that.
zoink
1yr ago
Why no co-sleep? Suffocation or too dependent of a child? Any suggestion on a good carrier? Everyone around here is all about Baby Bjorn... $239.99, that is a plate carrier...
zoink
1yr ago
We are a little older so we're looking to move as quick as possible. The real question is probably more what's too soon rather than too long, as long as fertility stay high, which wasn't a problem with this one.
zoink
1yr ago
This is literally what my wife said today. "If breast feeding isn't working find me the Keurig formula thing"
zoink
1yr ago
Thankfully we do, all 4 of them are within 30 minutes. She's been talking to our mom's quite a bit.
zoink
1yr ago
I currently (could all change when the kid comes) subscribe to Caplan's philosophy. Pretty much if you feed them and don't beat them they'll probably turn out how they're were going to turn out. Both of us do feel like our parents kind of left some things out and we got a bit of a late start on some things so hopefully we can influence our kids at least a little.
zoink
1yr ago
What is your top baby/kid advice? We are in the third trimester with our first. Revolutionary must have gadget, let them cry it out, co-sleep don't co-sleep, have a closet lined with mirrors to lock them in?
This might become my go to example of cancel culture:
Besides, the proof is in the fucking pudding! Unlike most people in politics or journalism, pollsters have a track record that can be tested against actual results. They can be held accountable for political bias that might render their polls less accurate. Rasmussen has indeed had strongly Republican-leaning results relative to the consensus for many years. Despite that strong Republican house effect, however, they’ve had roughly average accuracy overall because polls have considerably understated Republican performance in several recent elections (2014, 2016, 2020).
Even when you can track and mitigate the "bias", the wrong thinkers must be purged.
Do you speak Palestinian Arabic?
More options
Context Copy link