It’s interesting the Dems have been focusing on “we have to figure out a way to get our message out” and not on “maybe the problem is the message.”
You are in Pittsburgh, right?
It’s different in NYC in that my social circle is much more lawyer heavy. With that said, a lot of them don’t look down on other professions as much complain about the lawyer profession.
I think it is also rage against Elon because Trump won and Elon obviously played a role in it. I think democrats hate Elon more than Trump.
You asserted that X is an echo chamber. What is your evidence for that?
Also why would you assume blue sky wouldn’t be an echo chamber given that the media types specifically left X in reaction to losing an election.
Note that Gazans had done that to others (eg Palestinian Christians)
That doesn’t seem like a fair interpretation of what transpired.
I don’t buy into therapy. But if I was going to do therapy, I would want clear actionable goals for what I want to achieve and when it is achieved.
You might be interested in https://www.amazon.com/Order-without-Law-Neighbors-Disputes/dp/0674641698
It is a similar point in that law is useful when the game is functionally not iterative (either because of the size of the market or the size of the transaction) but when iterative law is basically irrelevant.
Fair enough
Except there is a large group of women who don’t share the values of the strikers. So effectively you have probably at least 40% of the population already going to defect and they will heavily benefit which would encourage the not true true believers to defect.
Have you seen the guys who are white dudes for Harris? I don’t blame women for not wanting to have sex with them.
Agreed. There are problems with how we calculate compensatory damages. That could be fixed resulting in the better cost benefit regulation of not just vaccines but al products.
What’s your experience?
Why?
And this is what is frustrating about modern vaccine discussions. Take for example the covid vaxx. It basically was useless unless you were old. But modern vaccines use the goodwill earned from the old vaccines to short circuit discussions on whether the new vaccines are worthwhile.
It is a bit odd how worried people are about credentials. Look at the last number of HHS secretaries. Do they really have better credentials?
I once lost my wallet in an Uber coming back from AC. It had about 800 dollars in it. A woman found it and took pains to reach out to me. I wanted to give her one hundred dollars as a tip but she refused as she said she was just doing the right thing. I told her to give the hundred to the charity of her choice and then she accepted. I doubt she actually gave it to a charity but I was okay with that.
Technically there are 500 dollar bills that are legal tender. But they haven’t been printed since 1945.
Ok. Now we are talking. So the problem isn’t torts per se but absurd compensatory damages. Isn’t the solution then not unlimited liability but a more proscribed amount of damages?
The issue with that is the government socializes costs but privatizes benefits. So what do you predict would be the outcome?
From what I’ve seen, the majority of vaccines are very low risk. The concern I have is that the combined cocktail hasn’t really been studied.
My kids got most but not all of their vaccines.
I don’t know why people want to retcon what happened. Many doctoral theses should be written on this phenomenon
Agreed you could waive liability but again I’m struggling with the basic economics. If the vaccines offer a lot of value and very limited harm the liability point shouldnt be a big issue.
These concerns just seem internally silly. The only reason prices would rise a bunch is if there are a lot of vaccine related harms. If the harms are very small, then the cost for pharma would be small meaning costs would not increase much.
So what is it? Do vaccines cause a lot of damage meaning drug costs would need to increase a lot? Or do vaccines cause little harm meaning costs would rise only a little?
- Prev
- Next
I think the left adopts this view because their self image is that of being the experts (by which they mean credentialed). The replication crisis strikes at the heart of this view. So they pretend it (and all of the other mistakes by the experts) don’t exist.
More options
Context Copy link