wraelk
3d ago
I'll second phailyoor here: the standard I'd want is "the mod hat should be on or off, per post".
If you're going to make a post that's part of your position as moderator, it shouldn't be combined with actual engagement in the discussion: people have to pay attention to moderator posts as it might be "stop it or you're getting banned", so adding Amadan-the-user commentary with it unfairly privileges Amadan-the-user's viewpoint ahead of other users. People are free to read or not read wraelk-the-user posts, and it should be the same for Amadan-the-user.
I thought there was some kind of mod-hat formatting this site had, and I'd expect the original post (as well as the one I'm responding to) to be in that formatting, with the actual engagement in the discussion moved to its own non-mod-hat post. That way users can pay attention to mod-hat formatting as conveying important mod information, and regular formatting as just being the on-equal-footing user having a regular discussion.
wraelk
4d ago
I appreciate the followup.
It seems like the concern is that the AI PR is over-technical and doesn't explain in simple language what happened: I don't see a lot of functional difference between the two. I can see the case that going back in and looking at the AI one will be harder to pick back up on "what exactly did this do", but I think I could figure it out from what they have: the AI writes overly technically, but I could easily see a human doing the same thing.
This change also adds a safety net fix for situations ???? <- the ai slop makes zero sense, no idea what this does.
It looks like there was a situation where if the directory for a worktree was gone, 'git worktree remove' isn't actually going to remove the worktree registration (presumably because it's intended to remove the directory and the registration at the same time, and possibly the original race condition detailed in the PR created a situation where that didn't happen properly for some worktrees), so it introduced a secondary method that checks "is this worktree safe to remove" then removes that worktree registration with a different command, to clean up that situation. There's another mechanism that could remove all stale worktree registrations, but the AI goes out of its way not to run that because it would create another race condition risk.
I checked the code to confirm that, but I do think that PR note actually does make sense, and someone more familiar with the codebase and effects than me (I honestly don't know what a git worktree is) would understand it more easily than me.
wraelk
4d ago
Can you take that PR and write a better description that you think would be more helpful than the AI one?
It seems like that would be the major step forward: instead of saying "it sucks", break down the problems with it and provide a superior human-generated one for the same content that we can compare it with.
wraelk
6d ago
You could publish an encryption of the text and just not reveal the key until you need to.
wraelk
9d ago
These are awesome and I'm going to steal them for my Pathfinder campaign. I've already mostly got the god-king, Moldbug's Fnarigal.
wraelk
12d ago
I hear Lalafells are pretty popular lately among the sexual roleplayers of Final Fantasy 14…
Tangential and not your point, but this is a pretty controversial topic in the game.
At least on the America servers, there is a strong standard against sexualizing Lalafells, and the sexy clothes and nude mods you'd find for every other species are completely forbidden among mod hosting sites and in-game communities. Since mods are all clientside and require a modded centralization service to show up on someone else's client, that's pretty effectively enforced in the community.
There was some brief drama when one of the main centralization services got taken offline after legal action from Square Enix and there was a scramble to choose its replacement from a number of forks, and if I recall correctly one of the more popular options was eventually blackballed by the community due to their position on sexualization of Lalafells.
I've heard from a friend of a friend about some individual ERPers that go for that sort of thing, and even accusations of being associated with such people can be enough to split apart a community. Though admittedly that's as much because FFXIV is an incredibly drama-heavy playerbase as anything.
wraelk
15d ago
Weird that political affiliation seems to be the most significant predictor.
Going from male to female is 51g-15ng to 41g-26 ng, -10g +11ng
Going from Republican to Democrat is 61g-13ng to 34g-31ng, -27g +18ng
I didn't think this was really a two-party-politics thing, but I guess what isn't these days.
wraelk
22d ago
Yeah, probably a few things here:
- Gaming journalists are often journalists first and gamers second, meaning they don't really have the same view of the space as their audience does, and might not actually be any good at playing games.
- Even if they are, they often don't have the same amount of time to invest into an individual game, because they have deadlines and their publication is unlikely to be sympathetic to "I need to invest 200 hours into Factorio to really get it enough to write a review"
- The classic audience/critic divide where critics are often more interested in niche artistic things that don't correspond to whether the work is actually good (or political considerations because they see themselves as tastemakers).
- Financial/access/networking considerations putting a thumb on the scale: even if the new CoD is absolutely awful, how many bridges are you going to burn to make that point?
The streamers that replace them have none of these problems: audience-driven financials can do weird things to political streamers but seem to work fine for gaming ones, they can spend as much or as little time as they want on a game, and they're under constant competitive pressure to provide a competent experience and align with their audience. They can be bought, but when they've got a steady stream of content and there's suddenly a sharp divergence in what they're doing, it's pretty easy to tell when they're being bought, and they can't really stop their audience from switching to another creator, either just skipping the bought content or permanently dropping them.
wraelk
22d ago
And more than just user reviews, you have the ability to look at Twitch or Youtube and watch someone play the game and get a feel for whether it's good and matches your interests.
For all the back and forth about games journalism, I think this was the real devastation to the industry: if you're interested in a game it's far better to actually look at gameplay than to see a X/10 score or a writeup of someone else's experience, and the barrier to entry is so low that you can pick and choose people who are actually good at the game and are choosing to play interesting games rather than terrible ones.
Sponsored streams can get a game exposure but the gameplay has to pass the gate of looking enjoyable, and a streamer who spends too much of their time on sponsored bad games will likely lose chunks of their audience (or the audience will just skip the sponsored videos/timeslots)
wraelk
25d ago
Researching how long it takes to drive to a particular location, then sending your husband to that location to get him out of the house
I'll note that the "research" in this case seems to have been a Google Maps route that shows drive time.
This is the kind of thing I would regularly do for a restaurant before ordering food from it or sending someone to go there. "Oh, that's 45 minutes away? Dang, I don't want Indian that much".
So I'm not sure this is only compatible with "she planned to have her husband out of the house for a fixed time" versus "she checked that it wasn't super far away before committing to that place for food".
What I'd want to know is how normal this behavior was from her: did she regularly Google restaurants before sending her husband there? Is that restaurant unusually far away compared to other restaurants she's sent him to before? She apparently wasn't driving at the time, so sending her husband out versus going herself would have been typical.
wraelk
1mo ago
The movie clearly distinguishes between the entity created by the wish, who obsessively loves Bear, and Nikki, who is also in there and hates Bear. When she screams and pulls back from the kiss on the first night, or when she begs Bear to kill her, that's not the entity, that's Nikki.
It's almost not even a monkey's paw, because it didn't do the thing he wished for: Nikki doesn't love him, the willow just inserted another entity that loved him into Nikki's body. I suppose if that entity is also named Nikki it technically monkey's-pawed him, but it's not a particularly clever monkey's paw in that case: it could have just set events up so that he became the owner of a devoted dog named Nikki, because he didn't specify which Nikki.
wraelk
1mo ago
Not sure what kind of lyrical complexity you need, but if you're a metal fan and want uplifting happier vibes, power metal is the way to go.
Sabaton, Battle Beast, Orden Ogan, and Grailknights as some starting points: generally very uplifting, positive, and high-energy, even if the theme of the song isn't particularly happy in every case, and there are a lot of other bands in this vein. Iron Maiden is also good, but I think a little slower and contemplative than many of their descendants.
wraelk
1mo ago
My wife is currently watching the trial (only on day 8, so may have additional information later) and is keeping me informed with elements of the testimony that are somewhat inconsistent. I'm not sure this would be enough to conclude someone else did it, but I do find it interesting that there's at least some strange stuff, and this is I think better than "Leos don't kill their cubs".
- The husband testifies that when he arrived and found her, she told him the kids were in the basement. When the paramedics arrived, she was in and out of consciousness but unable to communicate.
- Despite finding his wife post suicide attempt, being told the kids were in the basement, and having previously had her tell him that she felt like she wanted to harm the kids, the husband doesn't check on the kids (and find them dead) until after the paramedics arrived. He had previously called down into the basement before finding Lindsay and received no response.
- Her body temperature when admitted to the hospital was lower than we'd expect for the time she spent out there, which suggests there may be something wrong with the timeline (that she may have gone out the window earlier). They were able to restart the baby's heart at the hospital, which upper-bounds the amount of time the baby could have been dead, so timeline inconsistencies can't just be arbitrarily pushed, that might suggest that she was out the window before the kids were killed.
- There are blood drops on the door handle leading out of the bedroom Lindsay jumped out of, which doesn't make a lot of sense given that she killed the kids (in a non blood-producing fashion, asphyxiation), sliced her wrists and neck (with a knife that was found in the bedroom), and then jumped out the window.
- No conclusive fingerprints on the knife, and her DNA was found on only one of the exercise band murder weapons. His was on all the bands, but he untied the bands so that's expected no matter who killed them.
Unfortunately, the insanity defense means that her defense team won't be making a concerted argument that she didn't do it (which may be a rational strategy even if she didn't do it), and I'd really like to see that trial.
wraelk
1mo ago
whose job is just to sit around watching the AIs that are literally incomprehensible to them and be summarily fired and replaced if anything goes wrong as a result of AI behavior.
wraelk
2mo ago
This social vulnerability of Mrs. Cowles actually points to the real problem though.
Returning to our original concern:
II. A mother without a solid understanding of the world will be much more vulnerable to claims of "Your children are in grave danger from everything I don't like!" or "My magic beans will guarantee that your children enjoy perfect health!"
The people pushing these kinds of approaches are generally not backing it with nearly-ironclad scientific literature that can be picked apart only with an advanced degree. At most there might be something that kind of looks like a study if you don't squint too hard at it. Usually it's a headline with zero backing: for an example, an anti-vaccine friend recently gave me a picture of a man in a doctor coat, with a label stating that six children died in the clinical trial for a particular vaccine. Attempts to find out what the study was, how big the sample size was, what the death count in the control was, etc. have been so far unsuccessful.
Mrs. Cowles' knowledge of the financial system didn't matter because she wasn't engaging on that level at all: there were undoubtedly financially-related red flags, but she wasn't applying that knowledge. And if our goal is to create mothers resistant to incorrect health decisions pushed by someone with an agenda, their degree won't matter because it's far easier to take an approach that bypasses the topical discussion in favor of social weaknesses, which don't seem to be remedied as part of a higher education.
Teaching bullshit detection in schools is probably fraught with culture war concerns (undoubtedly everyone will be attempting to teach only how to detect the outgroup's bullshit). But if we're not going to do that, I'm not sure a master's degree is going to change vulnerability to these kinds of arguments. It's the equivalent of an intimidating twelve-foot-high barbed wire fence, but the gate is secured with a cheap rusted combination lock set to 1234.
wraelk
2mo ago
Does seem like you have to thread a pretty narrow needle to be able to afford the upset price of the house, but not to have an income stream that a judgment could seize.
Of course, the family part of this law makes it all more workable, because the person with no assets and the person buying the house can be two different people.
wraelk
2mo ago
Awesome, this makes it a lot more clear to me. Thank you for providing your expertise on the topic!
wraelk
2mo ago
But in the situation we're talking about with the New Jersey law, we'd end up in a situation in which of the two mortgages on the property, only the first one is paid off (because the first bank is only incentivized to set an upset price that makes them whole, and the second bank isn't capable of outbidding the family because of the right of first refusal). I'm pretty sure the unpaid second mortgage can't follow the property, but it still wasn't paid.
In this situation, does the second mortgage just disintegrate, or does the bank holding the second mortgage have a way to pursue a judgment against the homeowner for the unpaid debt? If so, how does that interact with a subsequent bankruptcy by the homeowner, keeping in mind that the homeowner would have a house with no mortgages attached to it and thus probably be past the equity number for an exemption?
From what I can tell, in chapter 7 they protect a certain amount of equity on the home: if your equity in the property is less than the legally specified amount, which in New Jersey is 63,150 for a spouse-jointly-owned home, they won't trigger a sale. The original intent seems to be "it's not going to make a significant difference in your debts anyway, so we're not going to bother", although I don't know if subsequent legislation raised it to a point where banks would want to trigger a sale if they could.
That wouldn't be super applicable here, since under this system you'd own the home outright and have the full value of the home in equity. It would work only for very low-value homes where the full value of the house is under the exemption(which might also be hard to get any significant second mortgage on). I'm not actually sure you could use the right of first refusal to have multiple people purchase a house, as well, which might mean you end up with half that amount of equity.
In Chapter 13 it seems like you can keep your house as long as you maintain your payment plan, but they can take it if you fall behind. So you might be able to negotiate some sort of discount, but that requires convincing creditors and/or a judge, and with a newly paid-off house sitting there it might raise some eyebrows.
So I do think you need a cutout here: one person defaults on the first mortgage, the relative uses right of first refusal to snap up the house, and the original homeowner just declares bankruptcy with no remaining assets.
wraelk
2mo ago
Wouldn't the pursuit of a judgment from the second mortgage (or bankruptcy proceedings, if they're taking that route) just lead to the house being sold?
edit: ok, no, I guess if you default on the mortgage they can't force a sale of the house. I'm pretty sure bankruptcy can lead to it being sold though.
wraelk
2mo ago
I addressed that above as well.
Graham Platner was running on essentially a generic Democrat party platform, and that's mostly what people were excited about, taking the same old Democratic talking points but with a "manly man" that could deliver them in a new form that might attract different demographics.
If he defects to the Republicans, he's either going to retain his generic Democrat positions or more likely switch to Republican ones.
If he retains his positions:
- For Democrats, he's got all the problems he does now with the added problem of the R next to his name. "Vote Blue no matter who" people are going to not vote for him because he's not blue, and people who previously supported him might worry that he's going to change his positions.
- For Republicans, he holds no positions in common with them: they're not going to vote for him JUST for the rape allegations when he's otherwise their opposition.
If he switches to Republican positions:
- If what Democrats really wanted was to vote for a tough guy ex-military sort that holds generic Republican positions, they've undoubtedly had the opportunity before now. He has no appeal for them whatsoever: he's not going to drive their favored positions forward, and he's not a cultural match. Some small fraction might suspect he's just outright lying and will swap back to Democrat positions, but that's an incredibly risky move. Plus he still has rape allegations.
- Similarly, he holds no special benefit for the Republicans: his positions are generic, his style is tremendously common among Republicans, and he's got the added burden of the allegations. If such a candidate was going to win an election for the Republicans, they would have already have found one, and likely one with less baggage. They might not actively oppose his conversion, maybe go "see how bad it is on the Democrat side?" but they're not going to promote him or be associated with him.
There's maybe some middle ground where he tries to only switch on a few limited positions, but that's not going to fly for either party. At least for white men, the Democrats aren't going to allow deviation on core party tenets, and for Republicans an 80% defection where the 20% focuses on gender relations isn't going to draw a lot of people. There may be some "communist incel" demographic that this might work for, but that's not a significant number of votes.
wraelk
2mo ago
It would make sense to back these if it was part of his general political plan, but I don't think he was intending to come at the topic from that angle: he genuinely did believe the Democrat party line of "the aggressor is always at fault", or at the very least had cynically decided to take the generic Democrat line.
All he ever was was a "tough guy" wrapped around a generic Democrat party platform, so if he started bucking that trend and going "actually don't believe all women" earlier, it's likely that he would have just lost his voter base, without a corresponding gain elsewhere. The media would have revved up on how he was basically a rapist, women would have been uncertain about him (with later stuff like that Republican ex-girlfriend gossip hitting much harder, even if we imagine a world where the current news stuff didn't happen), and he almost certainly would have just lost the primary.
wraelk
2mo ago
I think the problem with that is that up until the allegations surfaced, he was throwing those people under a bus.
He had some previous posts on Reddit back in 2013 talking about victims needing to take responsibility for his actions, but when confronted he immediately backed down, said he was "myopic", and said it was never the victim's fault, always the aggressor.
If he had consistently pushed for a perspective of mutual responsibility there might have been some space to rally around "the situation is more nuanced than that, as it often is" and cross the aisle, but his own stated philosophy, applied to him, means that he has no defense. He was the aggressor, so by his own words it is entirely on him.
wraelk
2mo ago
The new habit of remastering and re-releasing old games might affect that too. Civ 2 was 1996 and dropped off, but Age of Empires 2 is 1999 and just got a remaster. Being able to trivially pirate what's functionally the same game might be a problem.
Especially when some of those remasters go badly: Warcraft 3, for example, I think there are a number of people who would rather have the fresh-off-a-disc-install version of that.
I also wonder if, as the rate of graphics improvements drops off, the old games might become more valuable relative to their successors. Morrowind and Oblivion in their original forms are visually rough, but Skyrim is a 15-year-old game that is still totally fine visually. ES6 will look better, but probably not that much better, and if there are design, story, or mod opennness issues, it's much more likely that people would go back to Skyrim than that they'd go back to Morrowind in the Skyrim era.
Entertainingly, I'm apparently one of the few. I played Blizzard's League ripoff, Heroes of the Storm, for years, every single match against bots.
It's not like the personalities of League players are improving the experience.
More options
Context Copy link