@sun_the_second's banner p

sun_the_second

could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 October 31 11:26:45 UTC

				

User ID: 2725

sun_the_second

could survive a COD lobby and a gay furry discord server

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 October 31 11:26:45 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2725

The Israel-Palestine conflict has also been inflamed more recently even than Russia-Ukraine.

It's less that it's cheating and more that it creates perverse incentives to demand that all employees are on drugs (or that the load is too high for natties). It's why I'd object to performance enhancing drugs, anyway.

My guess is most people hold the phone in their right hand, and right-aligned buttons are easier to reach with the thumb.

Anywhere from colossal to infinite.

You don't believe that people who are already bad parents, and are only made more resentful when saddled with a child who will remain a toddler for decades, exist?

Not only is it "hard", it is fruitless. You're breaking your back tilling a field that will not bring forth the harvest. Some people enjoy physical labor without expectation of reward. Usually in small portions and as a diversion from monotony. Not as the monotony.

The coke is illegal, though, so the buyer can't quite claim consumer rights. If you're using it, you have to know that it might be smuggled from dubious places and laced with dubious chemicals, some of which can send you into OD.

I tentatively volunteer.

In some circles they use the z-word. In some, they don't bother anymore. Both sides though know it means "the Jews", and both sides are ok with it. Now defining precisely may be a bit complicated, but I'd say AWFUL crowd would mostly be like "oh of course I don't have Jews, it's just about Israel policies!" while the Muslim and other "historically oppressed" parts would be much more open about what it is about.

I note you aren't claiming that they use the word Jews when hating them. It's easy to believe that Muslims do, but then I also don't really count them as leftists.

When you say "they don't bother", do you mean they say "Jews are disgusting" and things to that effect?

Just as university students who literally denied Jews from entering the campus and physically attacked them were expelled, and so did the organizations supporting them?

In an event that wasn't targeted against specifically Israel, right? Right?

Again, I define antisemitism as the phenomenon of hatred against Jews as the whole group. Not "Israel", not "zionists" and not "the capitalists". It would include Jews who don't live in Israel, don't support Israel, aren't rich, don't practice Judaism etc. I don't know how you define it, but if it's "students who stage anti-Israel protests" then we aren't gonna get anywhere.

The simpler explanation is that most leftists today hate Israel, most leftists today love Muslims and most Muslims today hate Jews (but hold their tongue when in mixed company). This applies in general to broad groups of people such as "The Leftists" - if you find diversity of opinion, what is most likely is that they actually do not agree, not that they all believe the same thing but some hide it.

The heat map meme confuses me. According to this, the instructions are that each circle includes the ones inside it, i.e. liberals are at most guilty of caring about too many things, as opposed to too far things. But then this implies that the circles are exclusive of each other.

Apparently, the description of the task in the Methods section and the supplementary notes is in fact different. I'd assume most participants would follow the actual handout text rather than what the researchers claim they explained.

Apparently apparently, there were two tasks related to the moral circle and the heat map meme is about the simplified "extent" task, where the participants were simply asked to click on the rung that includes everything they care about.

P.P.S. Why is there no circle numbered 0 and labeled "myself only"? I'd like to see what the distribution between that and "immediate family" would be.

You're getting that thing. It's called your salary, and since you're still there it's clearly enough.

Last time I checked your job was moving money from people who are bad with it to people who are good with it. Why ever would the former respect you or believe they owe you anything?

Which left are you talking about? In no leftist circle I'm present in are Jews every mentioned negatively qua Jews. If Jews are ever disproportionately lambasted in those circles it is only ever as a function of their disproportionate presence among Israeli and billionaires. Should a leftist go "Jews amirite" there, I have no doubt that they would be promptly expelled, given that it doesn't happen.

If everyone can afford a Bugati Veron, what will the rich do to show off?

The same thing they currently do to show off within the same income bracket - invent taste and have more of it than others.

The gratitude is proportional to the possibility that the insurance provider might renege on the deal. A fire extinguisher basically can't, unless I failed to maintain it in working condition. An insurance company is... let's say "unlikely", although that varies per company and insurance types. Luigi certainly didn't believe, in the end, that it was unlikely.

But simply "being prepared" is not a visible thing. For good or ill there must be opportunities for the man to prove his willingness to fight for his family's safety in action, possibly in less severe cases than "kill or die", in order for the willingness to carry any water.

On the flipside, a woman might claim that she is fully prepared to stay by your side, in health and in sickness, for all life, but the divorce rate and indeed the possibility of no fault divorce speaks against her.

Most males in my circle overwhelmingly read fanfiction and/or mass-produced male-oriented original fiction that usually involves isekai, magic nobles and harems (basically wuxia but not Chinese). I suspect neither is a category that takes top places on Goodreads.

I suspect the luxuries of being a king would just barely pave over the jank of living in ancient Assyria, for someone who is used to the modern era. It's probably like that effect bidet users claim where you're going to hate pooping anywhere without access to a bidet afterwards. Sure, having a harem of the best concubines antiquity can offer would be great, but without penicillin, salt and adjustable faucets?

Can proudly confirm I have (although by utilizing similar unworthy fan methods) beaten Qingye on Legend. It took quite a bit of cursing the seven generations of her ancestors.

Given that most of damage to bosses seems to come from Sekiro finishers after depleting their poise, I'm not sure what's the point of using a weapon that doesn't heal you.

There is clothing with very few ribbons and shit, although perhaps not available immediately.

a rough implementation of chatbots into NPCs, you can chat with them and gaslight them into raising their affection value so you can get free shit.

I wasn't impressed by this particular feature, seeing as not only is it tedious to talk to clankers, but they seem to be programmed to drag the chat out for at least 4-5 lines before they agree with me, even if I had objectively dunked on them.

Otherwise, this young master (with the attempt at Benedict Cumberbatch's face, so the "young" part is somewhat a misnomer) has also reached Kaifeng, but is starting to cool on the jianghu somewhat. It doesn't help that the quests I've helped complete in coop don't become completed for me.

A notable feature of the character creator that the senior above did not mention is that it's powerful enough to create such yaoguai as Spongebob or Squidward.

Were there ever CSM cases where the minor was deemed not susceptible enough to the defendant's manipulation and control?

The burden should not be on the victim to convey to the court in her image or video that sexual misconduct with minors involves objective pain, emotional suffering, or humiliation. Rather, the burden should be on the defendant to prove otherwise. Common sense and human experience inform such an approach.

I do not see how it would be possible for someone to prove that a person on an image or video is not in pain when the assumption is that they would be hiding it.

It does tell you which gender, should the other vanish, would be more likely to actually survive past a single generation.

I remain convinced that the probability of a minority of women managing to sustain themselves through existing agriculture and sperm banks is higher than men inventing artificial wombs in one generation. Even if men cooperate on that, as opposed to going Lord of the Flies on each other.

and insinuating that when talking about a group specifically called the "Promise Keepers" is especially bad.

...why? Are we going to take the People's Republic of North Korea on their word that their republic belongs to the People in a higher proportion than the ones not called that?

That's kind of the rub with figuring out how good someone is at real real fighting. You can't practice that without someone at risk of maiming or death.

FWIW you usually don't have to press the face buttons at the same time. Rapid succession is not a problem for me usually.

The chemtrail claims come from geo-engineering, which do occur

The median chemtrail theorist says or implies that They are gassing people, with nefarious purposes. Not geo-engineering. That's what I'm getting at.

It didn't even take a genius to know that Muslims wouldn't respect western culture, the first person who told me that would happen was about 12 years old.

It doesn't take a genius to see that the Muhammad boy you know doesn't respect your culture and to repeat what adults are saying about Muslims, but that's not the same thing as knowing.

It doesn't matter how correct you are.

It absolutely matters how correct you are, because if someone actually decides to brave the low status and investigate, and the first thing they notice is that you were blatantly incorrect about the parts of the theory that are the easiest to investigate, many people are going to assume that the low status designation was correct. You have to lead with the parts of your theory that are undeniable. Schizos don't.