@satanistgoblin's banner p

satanistgoblin


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 February 16 13:30:06 UTC

				

User ID: 2193

satanistgoblin


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 February 16 13:30:06 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2193

Criminality causes poverty.

Left just likes reserving their sympathy for the worst people. They consider themselves superior for it, because any shmuck can have sympathy for a victim of violent crime, but only sophisticated people (or other criminals) would have it for the violent criminal.

And if they did surrender, then what? Likud is dedicated to preventing a Palestinian state and certainly accept one state solution with full voting rights for all palestinians. Palestinians were fighting with Israel back before Hamas even existed.

It isn't Trump the person that is getting the ire of the security establishment/power elite, but the policies he is claiming to represent and desires to implement.

Policies like First step act and Platinum plan? "Take the guns first, due process later"? Running up trillion dolar deficits?Maybe dems are angry because Trump was stealing from their playbook.

Giving up on Trump sends the message that their concerns can be ignored and brushed over for the sake of petty excuses

Then why is Ann Coulter for dropping Trump and nominating DeSantis? Or Massie?

Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton both have committed far more egregious crimes and problematic behaviors when compared to Trump, but nobody cares because they are fighting for the security establishment/power elite.

Sure, but that doesn't mean that Trump is innocent. Half of the prison population could be less guilty than those two for all I know.

Nominating Trump isn't a backfire. He's a divisive candidate and he wasn't a great president (better than Biden, but that's not saying much).

Trump only started leading by huge margins this primary after getting indicted. Glenn Beck and Tucker Carlson seeded a retarded narrative that americans should rally around Trump to somehow teach democrats a lesson.

That's a whole different issue. I am all for punishing the dems, but I don't think you'll end up doing that by nominating Trump.

He who wants to own the libs must take care not to get owned by the libs.

Trump goes down in the polls if he's found guilty, which he very well may be. Nimrata Haley is complete trash (pro war and anti anonymity), DeSantis is the obvious right choice.

Primary doesn't really matter, the issue is that the same kind of reasoning would apply in the general election if Trump is nominated.

This whole quagmire could be avoided if republicans simply let go of Trump and supported someone not so old and so indicted, but they love marching into a trap.

  • -23

Zelenskyy and Putin are working on it.

Boomers are the age bracket that supports Israel the most, are boomers going to become cool?

Is Ben Shapiro cool? Bari Weiss?

This supposed realignment looks like oppurtunism and internal jockeying. The right is embarrassing itself and will continue to be the wipping boy after this flare up is over.

Of course law enforcement policy influences crime levels, it's the whole point.

My point was that whole Syrian civil war was a huge debacle in general, I wouldn't be in favor of further US involvement even if chemical attacks were by Assad's forces. They served no strategic purpose other than possibly justify western escalation, question as always is - who benefits?

Haven't you noticed a crime wave happening because of soft on crime policies in places like California?

In Syria, US was backing jihadist terrorists against a secular government. Probably the only reason there are any syrian christians left is that Assad won the civil war.

Libya was a complete disaster.

In conclusion, if you want global destabilisation and rampant crime, listen to Scott Alexander.

Scott argued against cash bail (Soros DAs position), argued with war with Syria over chemical attacks (probably false flags), argued that overthowing Libyan government was likely effective altruism. He's a great writer but has terrible instincts at the end of the day.

They run a giant lobbying operation (and in all likelihood ran a blackmail operation (Epstein)).

Israel made us do it. The boomers made us do it. The brussels burocrats made us do it. The elites made us do it. Then why are the people all around me spouting the same naive view? They have not been forced. No, it’s us, our family, friends, girlfriends and neighbours, it’s always been us.

Third world immigration was never popular anywhere in the west, there was no referendum on this. Italians voted for less immigration, got more. UK voted for brexit expecting less immigration and got more. Quit victim blaming ordinary Europeans.

Israel is supposedly US' "greatest ally", that's what I'm referring to.

So either we support Israel genociding Gaza and stealing the land or we have to accept Gazans into the west so Israel can steal the lend, those are our only options?

With allies like these, who needs enemies.

Seems unlikely.

Why wouldn't they just blow it up while they have an excuse to? Netanyahu was talking about how he's dealing with Amalek all over again, do you know what was commanded to do to them?

Wasn't he brain dead basically?

"Civilization-barbarism" is a terrible lens for international conflict, you can easily whip up people into a frenzy with atrocity propaganda - bayoneted nuns or babies taken from incubators.

Allyship? America sends billions to Israel each year, what does it get in return?

Maybe Australia? Poland? I don't know who specifically is the greatest ally, but it's clear who isn't.

The ship could have blown up and killed everyone on board instantly along with any evidence of intercepted communications.