mildly_benis
No bio...
User ID: 1305
I assumed no liability applies to known and expected side effects, and that for proven vaccines you can cheaply and reliably test for any outright manufacturing trickery since it is possible to just settle on a standard.
The motivation in part is that I think diseases like polio or mumps should be a separate conversation. Clearly those vaccines had gigantic positive effects, and take attention away from questionable products and tactics used to push these products onto the public.
They are shielded for liability. Arguably the fox is guarding the hen house.
I think there is a distinction to be made here between proven, old vaccines for serious diseases, and everything else. I'm much more comfortable with no liability for the former. I don't know to what extent this distinction is feasible in reality, tho.
I quite enjoyed this album, thank you for the recommendation.
Can you explain how the green policy helped the US?
Fair question. Germany adding a ton of solar/wind (before it is economically reasonable) shifts their willingness to conflict themselves with Russia and accept some pipes being blown as a nothingburger after all. To the extent the reduced dependence is real, good for Germans. To the extent it is only an impression that will resolve into a crisis, 'unexpected' costs, too bad.
I also think reduced German/European competitiveness is something the US is pursuing. Drains the talent, conflicts European nations with each other, generally makes us easier to manage.
Yes, they added baseload natgas over nuclear, as others pointed out. Not as much as I thought, something between 50-100% increase since 2000, looking at some charts? And fossil fuels suppliers are fungible (at significant cost), some more natgas does not anchor them to Russia permanently, as we've seen. But fair enough, I should have done more hedging myself, was thinking of last few years too much.
He says it's actually the Russians funding the German Green party, not even hedging or speculating.
Greens were pushing for no fossil fuels, of which Russia is the default European supplier. Greens were pushing for continued war in Ukraine. These are policies that benefit the US.
Surely he knows this. I can't think of it as anything other than a blatantly dishonest narrative in the usual vein of 'Europeans are incompetent, not pulling their own weight, Russians doing with them as they please, they need a savior, that's us (again!)'. Genuinely infuriating. Sobering, too.
I meant internet in general, especially reddit; it was not my intention to suggest 'transparent pro-Israeli astroturfing' is noticeable themotte, just the genuine supporters.
Terrorism is pretty consistently using violence targetted specifically at civilians in order to enact political change
I meant 'discredited' in the sense of 'terrorist' label being a superweapon abused to the point of ineffectuality. I don't really have an opinion on whether you can formulate a useful definition of terrorism, maybe. Issue is, your formulation I think describes Israeli Gaza operation pretty well, but they are a 'legitimate military force'.
parading kidnapped naked women through the streets
I really wish this sort of labeling would be backed up by videos of something resembling a Roman triumph. But I'm guessing you are referring to the non-naked corpse of a woman on the back of the truck clip? I don't think female Israeli corpses are special, and the amount of attention that is being demanded for them and other Israeli victims (in broad Israeli astroturfing) is disproportional, at times downright deranged.
So the Palestinians get to demand to live in a judenrein society?
I think in a case where this means keeping Jews from coming to them - not even as refugees, but in a settlement campaign under state umbrella - the answer is an unequivocal 'yes, of course'.
Israel has offered peace multiple times
Settlement expansion, supported by the Israeli state, is essentially enough for me to conclude Israelis were never serious about peace with Palestinians.
Goal always the same - dispossession and/or expulsion. Slowly with settlements, domestic opposition mostly unserious - happy with the end result, only preferring the optics of serious concern and stalwart disapproval. Faster with aerial bombing campaigns.
From actual Israeli supporters to transparent pro-Israel astroturfing, the insistence on the 'terrorist' angle is striking. Does this really resonate with American normies?
I would think 'terrorism' a discredited label, counterproductive in most cases, especially in the context of distant desert squabbles. Is it not the 'common sense', dominant narrative in the US that the 2000's were a mistake born out of lies and a hysteria? Of course the actual costs to the Americans were miniscule, practically irrelevant, so I don't expect emotional investment, just disinterest and cautious 'this will not work on me twice' attitude.
I read it last year, there is a good rendition of it on librivox, silly Italian accent is a huge value add. Very enjoyable, though somewhat lenghty.
Barely a year ago Agnieszka Holland, in her movie, was chastizing Poles for their backward preference for a secure border. The elite camp currently in power enthusiastically nodded along, plebs chafed. Somehow I don't buy this change of tune.
In any case, it comes down to our inept attempts at destabilizing Belarus regime. Maybe we're getting enough results to justify the costs of this border issue, I doubt it, I think the window of opportunity is gone.
Well put. My read is that currently the US is eager for a war around Taiwan, not China, and so significant US escalation is the prerequisite for war. Repeat of Ukraine the ideal scenario, war to the last Taiwanese male and intact piece of infrastructure, no real interest in Taiwanese victory.
Maybe US will make some hard to miss, public move - I'll start worrying then. Maybe it will be a threshold of minor moves only someone closely following the region would notice - I'm doomed to be taken by surprise then.
Iran is not a serious country
Is this anything more than just a smear?
They are not serious about total war with Israel, for often discussed reasons.
They are serious enough to develop means to strike Israeli ground targets - can't say that about Poland (assuming the requirement is that such capabilities are not dependent on the whims of allies), and we need such weapons just as much as Iranians do.
Canadians don’t have a right to complain because of the residential schools controversy
I hate the idea that the residential schools narrative (and narratives of similar nature) could be so effective. How do you even begin to deprogram such a person?
Maybe just callously adopting your local equivalent of 'Armenian genocide? made up nonsense, and they deserved it all anyway' is the meta. Admittedly I'm biased in that direction.
A fine of 9000$ is quite something. A sufficiently determined tyrant will force ISPs to report connections to known VPN services. Can an ISP identify VPN endpoints by the nature of the traffic (not easily, I think)? What safer alternatives are there to the simple 'select VPN service, pay, connect'?
Civ 5 + Vox Populi is the king of the genre imo.
I can't tell if there's a vibe shift at all, but I imagine the assassination attempt incentivizes toning down the 'threat to our democracy' angle in favor of more positive messaging. 'Threat' narrative is already baked in, can still be pushed on the fringes, but ideally Trump does not get to mention the assassination in a 'high impact' context without seeming somewhat self centered.
Well said. Hope he does not get banned.
It's of course easy to propose optimizing the natives away when the framing is: only parasites are victimized, and not really. How do you justify this encroachment, again? What is being built?
I admit I see this post as a high effort variant of your occasional outbursts of hostility towards the natives. If you were 'chosen', then it was a mistake.
I am surprised how obnoxious I'm finding this topic. Maybe selective, or maybe I no longer have patience, with war and AI looming, for endless, careful dissection of such a mundane event obviously pulled into attention for political aims. More assassinations, please.
Incidentally, what are people's feelings on these AI article summaries?
Use the LLM to give you the first draft of a summary, review it, correct it, post it.
Do not mention you used one, and if you do, make it very clear it was reviewed carefully - of what use is the summary otherwise? I can generate it myself, and you come across as lazy, just padding the post out. Take full responsibility for the post.
Is no one actually curated a list of classics that have endured through the ages?
Despite the endless hours spent using the internet, I am consistently reduced to 'add reddit to the search' when looking for curated media lists, and competently curated information in general. To an extent, this is a personal failure. This stuff must be out there, in whatever form - a book, a blog - but finding it in the sea of slop is tough, and the effort is lost unless one is disciplined in maintaining a proper list.
I sure would love an AI assistant I could outsource this to.
Suggesting the next ten lines means I need to carefully review them, and I might as well just write them myself at that point
Talking Copilot specifically, the suggestions I wait for and review are typically 1-3 lines long, and it's the sort of code I review far faster than I type. Most of the time it knows exactly what I mean to write. Maybe an extensive, expertly setup & quality tooling could match it, but I'm too incompetent and too poor, respectively.
Also Copilot chat is hugely helpful, superior to a search engine for simple questions, though admittedly only once I settled on 'instructions' prompt that reliably prevents it from yapping. It gives very concise answers, rarely makes mistakes. It consistently saves me time, and is much more pleasant to interact with than your typical search engine result.
Out of curiosity, would you say classic code completion is 'helpful' when writing code?
- Prev
- Next
And there is a clear winner, too, the US.
Even Ukraine being ruined is a good thing if you take the longer view - sure, there will be tensions and resentment for some years, decades maybe, but these are people with a common language and culture. You can't rule out another reorientation in 10 years, so squint a little, and civilizationally degraded and depopulated Ukraine is weaker future Russia.
More options
Context Copy link