@jkf's banner p

jkf


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 19:07:26 UTC

				

User ID: 82

jkf


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 19:07:26 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 82

Thread sliding?

"Bad on purpose (by 4chan standards!) to make you click", pushing other threads off the front page.

Well in 2020 probably because Trump was saying mail in ballots couldn't be trusted. He created a partisan difference.

Unlikely that a significant number of BC residents were taking Trump's advice on this matter -- we are even letting people vote by phone starting this year Because Democracy.

It is either a weird shift in voter behaviour (for which I'd lukewarmly accept 'permanent covid brainfuck') or somebody is stuffing ballot boxes in a plausibly deniable way. (which I have no way of ruling out, other than 'just trust me bro', which is approximately what's on offer)

But it also isn't necessarily a problem.

Election Day (tuesday): conservative-guy leads by 100 (out of like 15k) votes, we have 500 not-in-person ballots left to count which we will get around to next Sunday

Friday: oops, actually now we have 650 ballots to count, TTFN :)

Sunday afternoon: wow, left-guy pulled 66% of these totally-secure ballots that people literally phoned-in and we filled out ourselves -- left-guy wins by 20 votes, left-party now has a single-seat majority

This is absolutely a problem man -- if this happens today it's treading awfully close to a "Jan 6 but for-reals this time" problem.

"Left-wing antifa riots in response to Harris win" was not on my bingo card...

No, what I'm saying is that this is not a partisan issue -- there's a bipartisan tradition of dangerous morons trying to tweak the system in ways that they think that will benefit them, and this should be looked down on by anyone who's not an ideological hack. (or just thinks that said morons are too incompetent to rig things effectively, if one is a PA republican I guess)

The important issue on the skewed late vote is not that it exists, it's why does it exist -- there's no particular reason it should be to the left, indeed AIR it used to be considered more likely to be to the right due to age distributions and old people not liking to leave the house.

The BC (Canada) election just had ridings flip due to ~65% left drops a week late, in ridings that were within 100 votes of 50/50 otherwise -- I'm lukewarm on both the 'people are still afraid of COVID' and the 'Joe Kennedy's ghost is pulling strings' explanations -- but the fact is, if you are rigging elections you want there to be late drops you can manipulate -- I see no particular reason for this suspicion-vector not to be stamped out.

Because in the world in which we live, for whatever reasons the late-counted votes seem to lean pretty heavily to the left -- the impact of a narrow win from the right on election day with 98% of polls reporting or whatever shifting to a narrow Kamala victory a week later on election confidence would be quite profound I think, especially in PA.

Do you want civil war national strife? This is how you get national strife.

(Not sure why you are so supportive of PA Republicans -- maybe they have undesirable goals here?)

They are really good with bacon & cheese especially -- but yeah, I will actually eat those black bean ones if we have some leftover.

The part that could be 'at their discretion' would be whether to charge criminally or not -- so the cops give you a ticket for stealing which you have to pay regardless, and the prosecutor may or may not upgrade to actual charges. Ideally he would do so, but if he doesn't at least there's something. Kind of an additional level on the summary/indictable (Canada) or misdemeanor/felony (US, I think?) ladder.

Why not do it on here?

Just, like -- post a thread and crank up the wit man -- it's free country, right?

Considering that this organization is literally publishing their passwords in an Excel document on the open internet, would you think that their physical security is likely to be particularly competent?

I think I caught a 1 day site-wide ban for saying "tranny" or something on there. (actually something less offensive but along those lines I guess, because whatever it was didn't attract any attention from the local mods)

The problem was probably not so much "attracting admin attention" as "attracting the attention of people who hate you and want you and your family dead -- but failing that will report you to the reddit admins"; same difference in the end.

Puts him in pretty good company I guess:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=JEmI_FT4YHU

Elon Musk is technically is an elite and has contributed greatly to society. Society is not going to solve difficult problems like space travel using only ordinary people. Difficult coordination problems require elites. Sometimes the public isn't always owed an explanation or it would be against the interests of national security, like the Manhattan Project.

Dollars to donuts Elon had a summer job shovelling shit or picking apples at some point -- Kamala seems to be kind of an early adopter on this sort of thing being Just Not Done for aspiring white-collar climbers, to the point where not only does she need to make up a story about working at McDonalds, McDonalds is the shittiest job she can even think of to lie about.

Trump probably never had to literally lay bricks or whatever, but based on how much he seems to enjoy hanging around with garbagemen and workers at his hotels, it's a good bet that he's done quite a bit of shit-shooting with the pointy end of his construction crews as well.

Yes? I've seen numbers run that for somewhere in the high ten figures you could have planes spraying enough particulates to counteract any reasonable amount of added CO2 -- it's not hard, and wouldn't take long.

Now that you mention it, doesn't it usually make more sense to see whether something is actually a problem or not before taking extreme measures to correct the possibility that it might become a problem ~50 years from now?

Treating petty offenses (at the discretion of the prosecuter I suppose) more as administrative violations would probably work -- lower the burden of proof (as with traffic tickets), then you can slap tickets on the prolific offenders and jail them when they don't pay up.

Not that anyone in a position to do this would want to, but it would be way cheaper than your idea.

Assume that it works, why would it? It's not as though the climate has become intolerable, or will be 20 years from now?

Strong odds that Rogan brings this up -- I expect he's pretty sympathetic to jokes not landing sometimes.

the Everybody Votes Campaign.

About Us: Strengthening political power in communities of color through increased civic engagement.

Surely a Republican front organization!

You could pretty easily automate a Euro "right to be forgotten" request and call it a day I guess?

The Canadian globohomos seem to be running into a bit of a brick wall already, so it might be sooner than you think.

My guess would be (assuming some level of competence on the part of the Trump team, I know) that they'd lean into the self-deportation -- if you crack down on illegals working/driving/transacting business in an effective way (which is theoretically possible, federally) then American Life becomes less attractive. Also it's not clear how much Trump cares about effectiveness of deportation per se -- being able to claim to have taken action and being cock-blocked by California or whatnot is probably fine with him.

Isn't a fetish by definition a minority preference? And by implication a small/fringe minority?

Someone saying they have a pizza fetish doesn't just mean that they like pizza; almost everybody likes pizza, it's not a fetish. (unless taken to some extreme; do not recommend googling "pizza fetish")

At time of this posting it's at 18 million views in the same number of hours.

Plus Spotify -- the reach of Rogan is just wild.

I'm about halfway through -- quite a lot of just shooting the shit, some MMA, some of Trump's usual talking points. Joe is being a very sympathetic interviewer, but he did sort of push back slightly on tarriffs/taxes/environmental issues.

Pretty bland honestly -- hard for anyone to claim that Trump is mentally incompetent when he can hold down such a widely ranging three hour conversation off the cuff though.

I meant more in a carefree sense where people around me are able to do this stuff. Growing older brings more responsibilities. So I appreciate being in these environments around people.

Those environments are usually called 'bars' -- i recognize they are less common in India, but around here they are not hard to find.

If not the manosphere, where are you getting this 'life ends at 30' stuff from? It's not real man.