hydroacetylene
No bio...
User ID: 128
The pro-life movement is dominated by Catholics who apply just war theory to direct action. This is why the pro-life movement has little tolerance for pro-assassination rhetoric.
This is how the SSPX wound up the target of a domestic spying operation- by reporting schizos they were banning from their chapels for advocating direct antisemitic activities. To say that this is a, uh, problematic incentive from a game theory perspective is probably correct.
You're describing Islam.
The progressive industrial complex does not depend on individual actors. These aren't genius visionaries. They aren't heavily centralized or cults of personality.
'by and large'
Sure, this is an 'off the top of my head' memory from the last time the NRA offered a grand compromise.
Peasant farmers always have high fertility, regardless of culture. The urbanization crash, however, is not a universal- not at the level China did.
Is he obligated to provide her with shelter?
Now requiring her to trade sex for it is a scummy thing to do. But it is not rape, that's the use of coercion or force to obtain sex from an unwilling partner.
No private sales(closing the 'gun show loophole') has been offered in exchange for concessions more than once, and always rejected when it was clear the gun control side was going to have to offer something. I suspect waiting periods would also be on offer. The NRA wants national concealed carry reciprocity and de-listing silencers from the NFA in exchange.
Typically the pattern is unorganized crime-> gangs-> reduction in random street crime-> organized crime problems. A bit like using fireants as a pest control tool- it's retarded because you now have worse problems, but it does work at the original problem.
Succinylcholine is the plot of a Tom Clancy novel.
Yes you can. It would likely trample on civil rights at least a little bit- and I'm very skeptical that you can have effective gun control without at least a continental-European level of laxity in civil rights regimes- but randomly searching ne'erdowells and charging them with a serious crime if they have a weapon works at controlling armed crime. But stop and frisk isn't allowed.
As of 2023, 60% of young men reported they were single. That number. 34% of young women reported being single. WHO ARE THE WOMEN DATING if not those young men?
It's like a combination of several factors, the largest being the Dave Chappelle skit about 'I don't have a girlfriend, but there's some women'd be upset to hear that'.
Women, by and large, do not want to 'get laid', they want to have a meaningful relationship which includes a sexual component. This is no easier for the fairer sex, and they run a few risks that are not realistic for a man to concern himself with.
Contact with reality.
Progressivism and neoliberalism having the same effects on society as a communist revolution that killed tens of millions is, uh, not the exoneration you think it is.
'Abolish the family' is not a new trend in left academia. Some noregsmen publishing it this time is, I mean, is Norway known for its social conservatism in academia? Fertility worries are trendy and blaming low fertility on strong family values is, yes, a take, but one which contradicts the available data much less than the average for the sorts of academics that dabble in family abolitionism.
Isn't there a rule against mass blocking? We have a handful of relatively prolific posters who seem to have blocked every other prolific poster.
The black population in America is declining as a percentage. Immigration comes heavily from everywhere but Africa, the AADOS TFR is lower than the white TFR, etc.
If he makes access to the shelter contingent on sexual favours, or implies that it is, yes. If he lets her in unconditionally, and their liaison is solely motivated by mutual desire, no.
That sounds like prostitution. This is a different sexual behavior than rape.
Sex is also fun enough that people use a variety of methods to stop it from reaching the whole point of the thing.
It needs to be said- dad can almost always recognize a future abuser. The normies just get intimately involved before they meet the parents.
yeah aside from the 9/11 highjackers and the Unabomber I can't remmber a single smart terrorist. Even the unabomber wasn't the smartest at actually carrying anything out.
The unabomber got what he wanted- he promoted his ideology so that future critics would pattern match onto it, establishing kleos influence that pushes towards, eventually, what he wants. He's replaced Thoreau in the popular consciousness, which gives him influence broadly.
The Brady campaign is currently a numerate, cogent, reasonable organization aimed at gun control supported by the data(they didn't used to be, but they are at the moment).
They are not popular or influential, because gun politics in the US is 100% partisanbrained conflict theory. The NRA and the Brady campaign are both doing things that meaningfully(but perhaps not massively) reducing gun deaths with things like safe storage campaigns and range instructor training. They're not the most popular organizations on either side.

Kruschev did not threaten to destroy the west, that's a mistranslation of what he actually said. Yes, 'we will bury you' is the correct literal translation, but that's a Russian idiom for 'we will be present at your funeral'. That is, he said communism was a historical inevitability(which was Soviet dogma and not something that was new) and capitalists would disappear.
More options
Context Copy link