greyenlightenment
investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...
User ID: 68
but the problem is norms can change suddenly and unpredictably, for both sides
but the existence of repercussions for voicing seriously delusional takes creates a chilling effect and prevents many of those takes from being voiced
this is good in principle, but it would seem as of it when one side is typically on the of said repercussions. California has the right approach in this regard, for everything else that is wrong with the Golden state.
i think the culture of secrecy is the bigger problem. they are paid lot and expected to not blabber to the media if they expect to be employed now or in the future by other companies
When the pendulum precesses , you don't know when you're on the receiving end until too late.
The more conventional the opinion, the more cartoonishly sadistic its enforcement. They love to talk about what ought to be done to pedophiles — not because they have unusually strong opinions about the well-being of children, but because pedophiles provide the broadest possible canvas on which to fantasize about social cruelty.
I think this has more to do with rallying support among a shelling point: pedos deserve to have violence inflicted on them, so as a way of making their other views palatable by first establishing a common ground..
Automatic updates are the worst thing . Everyone hates them yet companies do it.
This is like seeing a jet plane crash in the 1960s and being like "this idea will not work" or the Titanic sinking and thinking the same thing. Enough companies rely on such services that evidently it's worthwhile despite these risks.
But you bet your ass that everyone lost a lot of money today and that it may take weeks (or months) for some businesses to get back to the black.
The market's reaction was surprisingly sanguine to this. CRWD stock opened 11% lower and stayed that way; almost everyone thought it would be down 30% or more. The Nasdaq was green for the first 2 hours and then went red, which could have been due to anything.
The economy is huge. Even when critical things fail, there is enough stuff that works, plus rapid response to fix the problem, that the damage is not as bad as the hype would suggest. Ironically ,a bigger problem entails a more rapid response to fix it, so it ends up being briefer or not as bad.
Boeing's planes fall out of the sky.
I could be wrong, but the number of fatal Boeing crashes or lesser incidents is not an outlier compared to past incidents and other manufactures before all the media scrutiny. Anyone remember the 737 rudder jams during the 90s? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_rudder_issues#:~:text=During%20the%201990s%2C%20a%20series,board%2C%20157%20people%20in%20total.
It was a different model and hardly got similar media attention despite two major accidents with lots of fatalities close together
It's already over. The biggest non-crisis ever even if it was the among the most widespread.
No direct culture war implications, but goes to show just how much of a house-of-cards the tech ecosystem is. 1 little, simple, stupid bug can bring the whole world to a halt. Yet, the industry continues quarterly-earnings chasing.
That seems overdramatic. I have not noticed any disruption at all; if not for all the headlines this morning I would have never known about this. An upgrade was rolled out and it was fixed. This requires manual intervention of servers, which is why IT exists as a profession in the first place. It's not a crisis like on the order of Covid or 2008, but more like a mass disruption. I think too many people are overreading into this as some sort of harbinger of the awaited collapse, and really it's not.
Airlines were grounded; again, this is a common occurrence. There was a similar incidence as recently as 2023 when many flights were grounded https://www.reuters.com/world/us/why-us-flights-were-grounded-by-faa-system-outage-2023-01-11/
it's bad, no doubt, but the mass-grounding of flights is something that typically happens every 2-3 years.
End of the day, tech workers are treated as disposable labor. Executive bean counters are divorced from the product. And the stock price is the only incentive that matters.
The fact they are paid so well and exhaustively vetted in the hiring process suggests they are not disposable. Companies invest a lot of resources in new hires . There is also a loss of perspective in that people forget the other 3650 days of the past decade in which there is no major failure, but a single failure is suddenly a major indictment on the entire tech industry, as opposed to something more mundane like a mistake.
Crowdstike stock was only down 11% today, which is far less than expected given that it has been implicated in the greatest IT failure ever. By comparison, Meta stock fell 15% in a day last after it missed the highest of earnings estimates. This is reason to believe it's not as bad as the overly dramatic language would suggest.
One would hope such companies learn from past mistakes, but as tech changes, consequently so do the mistakes. So I can expect incidents like this in the future.
before the advent of modern medical care and decent body armor , aiming for the torso would have been better . infection would have been lethal if initial bleeding/trauma wasn't
photos and eye witness describe it it being a riffle
it instantly killed one of the audience members after being hit to the head
snipers regularly aim for the head ,as the secret service had done for example. they didn't shoot his torso
agree. when has experience ever been a major deciding factor? Palin anyone?
agree. this center of mass rule is for police shooting at ordinary civilians who do not have body armor
I think after seeing he missed his initial shot realized he only had a few seconds left, so unloaded as fast as he could
It is the thoracic triangle from what I read. Shooting him from beneath the chest would not have been lethal given rapid care . He was wearing armor
trump was wearing body armor . Given that Trump had medical staff within feet, the killer's only choice was a headshot which would have been instantly lethal. even aiming for the upper torso could have been survivable with armor and rapid medical attendance.
It would be probably be the worst national crisis since 911 . It would not have as serious economic consequences of covid or 911 but it would be bad in ways that are hard to know because they would be unprecedented
I am guessing he means at home or in general
i dunno ? a prez candidate killed with head shot on live tv ? seems pretty dire to me. It would be way worse than just trying to find a new candidate, like had he died of a heart attack or something. True, the country quickly moved on from the JFK assassination, but would have been worse.
There isn't much tissue damage because it missed
Agree not a false flag. I think some people cannot bring themselves to accepting that political violence is real and the dire implications had he succeeded.
Makes the Bush years seem quaint by comparison. When Trump rode down that escalator the country was forever changed
Yeah he was right
it came within a inch of a killing , missed cause he turned his head. snipers aim at targets when not moving, trump was moving. the killer only had a small window to make the shot before he was killed, so presumably he could not wait for trump to be perfectly still
So in the span of 8 days: trump assassination attempt, Cloudstrike, and now the presumptive democratic nominee steps down, a first in decades. I think you'd have to go as far back as LBJ the last time this happened. The big winner is Elon Musk and twitter by putting himself center in the media spectacle. In hindsight, it looks like his purchase will pay off as the news cycle continues to intensify and twitter surges in use.
More options
Context Copy link