https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto etc. etc. etc.
Govt. number: DO NOT REDEEM THE CARD SIR. You think that idea would be to a net benefit of the normies?
the suffering is not an integral part of the process
I beg to differ. The spite I feel towards vegans improves the pleasure from eating meat. Also the suffering is a bulwark against becoming like that girl featured here recently, who had turned her apartment into a breeding colony for pest insects.
Godwin's Law fell into abeyance, so I feel comfortable asking: would you call the dangers of Third Reich hypothetical after the publication of Mein Kampf but before Hitler took power? When enemies say what they want to do to me, I'd rather take them at their word.
Modern community? Or historical? It would suck to exist in Sparta, but I've read enough of female designs for the society to know it would suck vastly more. Culling of men, castration, loss of rights, the usual.
Why? I think it was Jim who suggested to block oxygen to every newborn female's brain long enough for irreparable damage to sapience but not long enough for death. "We" can continue like that indefinitely. Or if instead the other sex manages to win decisively, that's a weak proof that they also could continue in this manner by doing the same to boys.
This is just like communists who adore their meme about how every other division between people is an invention of infinitely powerful capitalists as a distraction from the class struggle, the only one that the communists insist matters. There are countless axis among which other people are my enemies. Only one from the set of every religion plus atheism can be on top. Only one sex can subjugate the other. Linguistic prescriptivists can't live in the world where linguistic descriptivism is the dogma.
I might have taken it too literally, I read it as that a job must be provided to any applicant, nobody can be fired, and simultaneously people are not compelled to work. On second thought, this isn't impossible, it's just welfare mixed with LARP.
Testy? Just a tired and resigned addition of another pebble to the mountain of evidence that "female" is equivalent to one of the many kinds of enemies.
providing permanent jobs to everyone capable and willing
I can't remember any examples of this system. Without the last word communist states would be close, though "permanent" is a stretch, but with the addition of "willing" it appears impossible. How such a thing would work?
It talks about any scale of problem up there. In every scale nothing will ever get better, and most things will get radically worse. From balding to the coordinated destruction of the disfavored demographics and the human civilization as a whole through wokeness, all scales of problems are inescapable.
You're here, and I really wish you weren't. The way you are now, compared to 2020 adds immensely to my feeling that I should kill myself before it's too late.
Some years back I was marginally active on Reddit, not at the power-janny level, a post or a comment here and there, and having a handful of accounts to upvote myself, without any bots or efforts to circumvent detection, made a notable difference in the visibility of my quips and animal videos. Still you're dead wrong. Hacktivists aren't manipulating Reddit, because manipulation implies an outcome the target isn't desiring to happen.
Even I who is fine with leaving the framework intact and only swapping demographical categories, a position which not many on the right share, would not call it a small difference whether the boot is on the faces of straight White men or worn on the feet. Maybe for some Rawlsian intelligence from beyond the mortal world it is.
For the first type of edge cases, the same thing as sucking at marksmanship or having an insufficient weapon to penetrate the target. For the second type, are you arguing that piv sex in condom is not piv sex?
eta: chastity cages should be outlawed separately, for the reasons of their misandristic nature.
No tortured constructs needed, just prohibit penile stimulation of prostate.
A point towards @Capital_Room's interpretation of what racism is in the eyes of the people who matter.
What's your opinion on Nick Sandmann?
No, I categorically reject interpreting my prediction to mean 3rd percentile of income, or people who care about income at all. It is obvious in any non-bad faith interpretation that I meant people with the means to shape the society and its course, not hundreds of millions who reside in right places while possessing right skills.
Why did you stop the quote there? Why did you not include the part which says "which plan to" that in any plain reading implies that those things have not happened yet?
Separately, how my naming any particular elites as the drivers of this upcoming change, differentiating them from their fellows who are along for the pleasant ride, would change anything? It would only invite further nitpicking and pedantry.
If you're talking about income, you're not at the top definitionally. How many banks do you own?
Why is it consistently missed that this is my prediction for the future? Yes, we don't. We will. Unless we die, or I'm wrong.
So the term which is common in political discussions is his invention. Two good things about him, then. Hitler invented autobahns or something.
You're misreading me, two times in a row now. The existence of wealth gap is trivially true and is no prediction at all. I'm saying that it will grow monumentally in 2100 compared to 2000, and also, this part you're completely ignoring for some reason, the absolute value of available energy and freedoms for a common person will be considerably lower in 2100 than 2000. And no, I'm not at the top even if I'm in a position to be a lazy layabout with internet and hookers, and if you're posting here, I assume neither are you. How many banks do you own?
There is a wide array of female authors providing similar intentions, just look for any quote compilation by a naive MRA. I'll refrain from giving my favorite one, I dislike having my disposable accounts connected.
More options
Context Copy link