ToaKraka
Dislikes you
User ID: 108
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9hr ago
According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, for consumer units of three people:
| Income (k$/a) | Average expenditure on food at home ($/mo) |
|---|---|
| Any | 623 |
| ∈ [0, 15) | 416 |
| ∈ [15, 30) | 480 |
| ∈ [30, 40) | 507 |
| ∈ [40, 50) | 452 |
| ∈ [50, 70) | 576 |
| ∈ [70, 100) | 537 |
| ∈ [100, 150) | 641 |
| ∈ [150, ∞) | 799 |
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
13hr ago
TinyURL? What year is it? IIRC, link shorteners are even banned on Reddit due to their potential for causing problems.
All you have to do is delete the "url=" that you accidentally added at the start of the link.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
14hr ago
Spanish doesn't have the /θ/ phoneme
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
15hr ago
the Court was categorising any American who requires the use of glasses as disabled
The article appears to say the opposite of that.
In subsequent years, what [the ADA's definition of disability] meant would be fought out in court. Unlike what happened in the aftermath of the Civil Rights Act, however, the judicial branch behaved somewhat reasonably. The case of Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. was decided by the Supreme Court in 1999. A pair of twin sisters both applied to be pilots, but were told that they did not meet the standard of having uncorrected 20/100 vision or better. They sued, saying that they were being discriminated against. The Supreme Court ruled that the sisters were not actually disabled, because they had a condition that could be corrected—in this case by using glasses or contact lenses.
Crucially for its decision, the Court pointed to a Congressional finding included in the ADA that approximately 43 million Americans suffered from a disability. If the justices adopted the definition of disability urged by the plaintiffs in Sutton, it would include, among others, everyone who needed glasses. That would mean that over 160 million Americans were disabled. The original Congressional finding, however, arguably put a much smaller numerical limit on how many people were protected under the ADA.
Though Congress then effectively overruled that decision.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
16hr ago
Seeing the same events through different implementations can be cool.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
2d ago
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
2d ago
I personally found the Binding of Isaac games as played by Bisnap fairly fun to watch, way back when he uploaded pre-recorded videos rather than streaming (Wrath of the Lamb, Rebirth, Afterbirth). But I'm not too interested in playing these "wiki games".
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
3d ago
Leaderboard of uncensored LLMs
| Model | Billions of parameters | Willingness to obey user | Knowledge of NSFW topics | Writing ability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| darkc0de/XortronCriminalComputingConfig | 24 | 9.8 | 2.6 | 35 |
| ArliAI/GLM-4.5-Air-Derestricted (no thinking) | 106 | 8.8 | 2.7 | 43 |
| xai/grok-4-1-fast-reasoning | Proprietary | 6.5 | 4.8 | 51 |
| anthropic/claude-opus-4-6 (adaptive, medium effort) | Proprietary | 3.2 | 6.4 | 69 |
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
3d ago
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
3d ago
Earth is a sphere, not a plane. Moving 100 miles west (on a line of latitude, not on a great circle) after you go north moves you through more degrees of longitude than moving 100 miles east does after you return to the latitude where you started.
At the extreme: Starting at the equator, if you go πr/2 north, 0 miles west, πr/2 south on a meridian of longitude 90 degrees east of the one where you started, and πr/2 west, then you will end up where you started (having traversed a triangle with three 90-degree angles).
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
4d ago
Uh, I understood the stereotype is that the hotter she is, the less effort she needs to put into obtaining sex.
I'm pretty sure I've seen jokes on 4chan (and possibly even on Reddit) about how the ugly "practice girlfriend" will put in extra effort in bed while a hotter woman will not. But I can't find any such jokes after a cursory search.
I want to say 5% of men acculturated to the modern West
IMO, this is ridiculously low.
-
"Would you fuck a random hot woman (with no STDs)?" Call it 30 percent (assuming the other 70 percent have romantic partners and don't want to cheat).
-
"Would you fuck a hot woman (with no STDs) who put zero effort into the sex, but merely allowed you to have your way with her?" Still 30 percent (all of the remainder).
-
"Would you rape a hot, unconscious woman (with no STDs), if it were magically absolutely 100-percent guaranteed that you wouldn't be caught?" I think 10 to 20 percent (1/3 to 2/3 of the remainder) is a reasonable guess.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
4d ago
To me, having sex with an unconscious woman would have pretty much zero appeal no matter how hot she is, and I have a hard time believing I'm some weird undersexed outlier. It's not even just about it being rape (which it obviously is), but it would also be like fucking a RealDoll, which I know some men do also but I have always thought has to be the absolute last refuge of the desperate and pathetic.
I'm just a "desperate and pathetic" virgin, but I think this sounds unreasonable. Isn't it a stereotype that the hotter a woman is, the less effort she feels that she needs to put into sex? Yet, despite this stereotype, men still seek out hot women (including prostitutes). The difference between sex with a lazy "starfish" woman and sex with an unconscious woman seems negligible.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
4d ago
There's an "insert image" button directly underneath the comment-input box.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
5d ago
test: /images/17711218347644198.webp
Also:
>he doesn't already have his own website to upload images to
ngmi
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
5d ago
If you want to you can argue that it's sad, too, but that doesn't make it not funny.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
6d ago
-
1878 silver dollar: 6/7 ounce
-
1971 copper dollar: 1/3.5 ounce
-
1979 copper dollar: 1/4 ounce
-
Quarter: 1/5.5 ounce
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
6d ago
You aren't supposed to puncture the slices and spill the juice all over your hands.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
6d ago
If you're referring to the peel, I normally peel oranges directly over something to hold the peel—a trash container or a saucer at home, or a lunchbag or a napkin away from home.
If you're referring to situations where the peel sticks so tightly to the flesh that the flesh breaks and spills juice everywhere when you try to remove the peel, in my personal experience such situations are vanishingly rare.
Link
More options
Context Copy link