I guess we just disagree. I don’t read “rebuking” as a threat, and certainly not one that warrants pointing a loaded gun at somebody.
What do you think she meant when she said this? “I rebuke you in the name of Jesus”?
If you went into somebody’s house and they told you that they had negative emotions about you, would you leave, or threaten to kill them?
What does “rebuking” mean here?
At 13:50, the cop tells her to go check on the burner because they don’t want a fire: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HFun2GydGyU
I’ve seen a lot of people hang the justification to kill this woman on the phrase “rebuke”.
What does “rebuke” mean to you?
Go into somebody’s house.
Tell them to go get a pot of water
They go get the pot
Hey I feel threatened
Don’t worry I’m not threatening you, lol, I a devout pacifist. I disagree strongly with your reaction in the name of Jesus, a famous pacifist you are likely familiar with
Don’t use this opportunity to leave.
Use this opportunity to take out a loaded gun and point it at a woman and tell her you’re going to shoot her in the fucking face.
She cowers on the ground
Don’t use this opportunity to leave
Continue not leaving or retreating from the woman who’s house you are currently in pointing a gun at her head while she cowers on the floor in front of you after you said you’d shoot her in the fucking face but instead walk towards her while your friend, also in possession of a loaded gun, watches.
She throws the pot of water you told her to go get at you.
You shoot her in the face
This seems like such a clear cut case of aggressive anti social cops looking for reasons to kill somebody.
This is a perfect example of bad cops.
These cops are also posing a danger to her.
Except she wasn’t charging, she was cowering in the ground in her own home while somebody pointed a gun at her after theatening to shoot her in the fucking face.
Here’s the general course of things as I see it:
-
The cops are there, and trying to get this woman’s ID
-
She can’t find it, and says she will get some documents for them.
-
They’re sort of mocking her about saying they’ll review the documents she wants to show them, and trying to get her ID.
-
One of the cops tells her to get the water that’s on the stove boiling because he doesn’t want to deal with a fire here.
-
She gets up to get it, and while she is getting it, he backs away from her.
-
She asks him why he’s backing away (I should note she sounds like she’s being extremely cordial and nice here)
-
He says he doesn’t want to be near her with a pot of boiling water.
-
She says something about “rebuking him in the name of Jesus” - again this sounds like she is trying to be friendly and build rapport with them. She sounds like she’s smiling, and almost flirting with the cop.
-
The cop pulls out his gun, points it at her, and says “you better not or I’ll shoot you in the fucking face”
-
She cowers down on the ground
-
She throws the pot at him,
and he shoots her,either immediately before or immediately after this she throws the waterwhich lands on the ground between them, and he shoots her.
As far as I’m concerned this is evil.
Maybe more comes out and my feelings change. My feelings now are that these people are pure evil.
Look I don’t care if this poor woman threw a pot of fucking water at these guys. They were POINTING A GUN AT HER. Pointing a gun at somebody is a major act of aggression and their lives are not more important than hers. Can she point a gun at them for her own safety just in case they reach for theirs, and then kill them if they do? No.
I’m sick of a lot of things and cops getting to act like thugs who can threaten your life at will, as if it doesn’t have value, is one of them. If I point a gun at someone it’s assault, if I even show off my gun when somebody is threatening me, it’s brandishing. These retarded sub 100 IQ assholes pull out their loaded guns and point them at people all the time as if that has no meaning.
To reiterate: I hope they are tried and convicted by a jury of their peers.
She was subpoenaed by congress. Bannon is currently in prison for not answering their questions.
I’m really getting sick and tired of this “under investigation can’t comment” excuse. Seemingly everything is under investigation at all times.
Here’s a video of him trying to get into an SUV and needing a lot more help than normal:
https://x.com/anthonycabassa_/status/1813780713747149084
This was last weds when he disappeared for “covid”.
Maybe not the dead Biden thing, but the palace coup thing.
This one makes at least some sense.
Kamala at one point says: “joe we’re so happy to have you on the recor….on the call. It is just so good to hear your voice”
Does this not strike anybody else as a pretty odd thing to say?
Imagine this was another country. Putin disappears due to some illness, and a few days later announces that he is withdrawing himself from politics, but he does this by posting a jpeg to Facebook, then nobody hears from him for a full day, and what we finally get is him calling into his replacements press event with what could easily have been some prerecorded audio.
I mean…what the hell? Why not have Jill call in at least?
I don’t like it when the libs do stuff like this or rioting because it violates my principles.
But the underlying reason why is don’t like having my principles violated on a large scale like this is because where my principles used to be the default societal principles, it signals that they aren’t anymore.
I don’t like seeing buildings burned partially because I don’t like the buildings burning, but also because I don’t want the live in a society where building burning has become a necessary part of participating in the society.
So when the libs were cancelling people for the okay symbol 4 years ago, the feeling we were all feeling was dread at watching the society change. But now here we are.
A similar thing will happen when the democrats have their way and “pack” the Supreme Court. The republicans will be forced to pack it back, and so on and so forth until it’s destroyed.
Okay fair point that there should probably be some people that can blend into the crowd.
But the people literally walking around the President as actual literal meat shields should actually be the hulking beasts I'm talking about.
They’ll just say he wants to be a bridge to the next generation and that he’s dropping out to do that.
He made statements in that direction during the campaign. It doesn’t matter what he’s said in the meantime. The media will just go with it.
Sounds like there won’t be very many female USSS agents.
They get around $3B a year, which is about the same as the military if New Zealand.
JUST for presidential/former president protection their budget is about a billion and a half dollars.
Yes that’s not literally unlimited, but it is functionally unlimited, and is also more than they even asked for, which would seem to suggest that it may be literally unlimited as well.
That should be more than adequate to keep a kid from crawling up on top of a roof 130 yards from Trump and shooting at him.
They have unlimited funding and a license to do whatever they want like close down all the roads, jam cell phones, etc.
Tough tiddies Trump is difficult to guard. Figure it out.
I think this is exactly it. No conspiracy, just a person who was slightly past not caring.
It’s because the service became looked at the same way special forces is: it’s a trophy that can be used to open doors to other jobs, or bragging rights.
So it becomes something that needs to be equally distributed. That’s why you have a woman running it talking about increasing the number of women she hires, and then the embarrass videos from last Saturday.
USSS members should be 6’5” terrifying meat shields with guns. Yes Brienne of Tarth, no to Caroline Ellison.
If you’re trying to tune out, writing a big motte post about how much you don’t care is not really necessary, and is probably counter productive to your goals.
More options
Context Copy link