@Mantergeistmann's banner p

Mantergeistmann


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:52:03 UTC

				

User ID: 323

Mantergeistmann


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:52:03 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 323

The most "bleak sci-fi" thing I've seen in a while was images of the absolute spiderwebs of spent drone fiberoptic cables covering forests and fields and towns.

I feel like there's a Russell Conjugation to be had here: "I stand by my convictions in the name of justice, you are irritatingly stubborn, he is a bullying Karen subverting the justice process."

Although I will add that 12 Angry Men did indeed involve logic and reason as well as stubbornness and emotion, but I'd imagine very few people think of their own behavior or a verdict they agree with as ever not being logical.

It's not an overpopulation problem if enough people get killed in the wars. I mean, you've got other demographic problems them, but no longer overpopulation.

Not if enough men die in the wars.

"People are okay with nudity when there's a fig leaf covering the genitals, but are outraged when the leaf isn't there!"

And then a lot of them get abused by NIMBYs grasping for any veto-points they can find.

Was it here that someone mentioned that green projects run into some of the worst NIBMY obstructionism?

Even during the decades of single-party house/congress control, the Presidency was swapping sides pretty regularly.

I'm very fortunate the last year or two has been good to stocks, as aeeing my 401k index fund performance has given my partner the courage to set up an auto-deposit/auto-invest into an IRA. It also probably helps that as of now, it's still a very small amount compared to the overall retirement picture, so it doesn't feel like it's risking loss of a significant amount.

In fact, we now have a richly-established norm of NGOs and activists suing the federal government and so that their political allies who run the government can settle. Welcome to the world you made.

If I recall, that used to be a major issue with shipbuilding. Might still be, even.

The "$1776 million" is, astonishingly, missing from most headlines, which is almost as insane to me.

That's... pretty clever, actually. What's the best way to acquire them? Do you just get them from your local bank, or what?

I've seen it in the US in the past, I'm pretty sure, but it's certainly not universal.

Sometimes the fraud systems flag you, no card.

For me, that's more likely (both to happen and to have immediate requirement) when I'm traveling, hence (one of the reasons for) keeping a nominal but not bank-breaking "emergency cash" in my wallet. Plus multiple cards, including with differing institutions.

What, in case you get Isekai'd to a fantasy realm?

They're entirely opposed to "Red Tribe, called America".

Korea is one of those weird economies/markets that's classified as both emerging and developed, depending on who's doing it, right?

I try to always keep $40-50 as a minimum on my person (separate from my spending cash in my wallet).

As far as cash in the house beyond that? None. The situations where I will need cash in an instant and a check/electronic venmo/run to the ATM won't work are... basically just an EMP/solar flare situation that I for some reason can't wait out for restoration. Maybe that happens, I run out of food in a week, there's still no government response, but the stores have product they're willing to sell for cash only?

Perhaps I'm unimaginative, but it just seems too unlikely to be worth worrying about for me personally. Not that there'd be any harm in keeping extra cash in house, though, so it's not a terrible idea just for things I haven't thought of and/or convenience.

Considering getting back into League of Legends. I stop whenever I remember how much I hated playing against other humans.

Hah. I lost it a long time ago. Possibly in a move, possibly thrown out after water damage. Possibly given away to a younger cousin?

Still remember when my cousins and I were opening packs, and I got a second holographic Charizard and had to give it away to another cousin out of "fairness". Was pretty bitter at the time, but it was definitely the thing to do in hindsight.

I'm honestly sad that most of the large D&D subreddits have banned anything with a whiff of AI, because I think it would be nice if there was a space for non-slop AI-assisted products for D&D. Instead we have /r/dndai which is 50% sexy elf girls, and 100% slop.

It's always entertaining to me when the large D&D subreddits are so hostile to AI character portraits... apparently everyone forgot that the truly virtuous way to get a character portrait was to google some vague traits and grab the first thing on image search that was kind of like what you had in mind.

The Abyss was deemed ineligible for the Oscar for best visual effects because it used CGI.

Did it not win?

At least some people do care about how art gets made. (Others don't, of course. It's an issue that people at large are genuinely split on.)

To be cynical, how many of them only care because it's become somewhat polarized? If it had instead gone the route of "AI is left-aligned, because it allows the poor and underprivileged without money or time for training to create art and collaborate", and anyone against AI was getting pilloried on social media in certain circles, I have a hunch that there'd be some (but not all) reversing their dtance.

Solid response. Objection withdrawn. Carry on.

"Lord, protect me from my friends sympathetic press; I can handle my enemies on my own."

this seems like just about the most macabre kind of hair-splitting I've ever encountered

Yes, but it's still important. There is a significant value in truth and precision. If nothing else, it prevents people from saying, "Aha! You were lying or exaggerating about this, clearly I can disregard the rest of your claims equally!"

If you're not prepared to stand behind a claim, you shouldn't make it.