@Mantergeistmann's banner p

Mantergeistmann


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:52:03 UTC

				

User ID: 323

Mantergeistmann


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:52:03 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 323

but the more expensive one is more focused on the philosophy of utilitarianism, while the cheaper escort is more into continental philosophy, which is less in demand by rich johns right now

"How long can a girl be expected to sit around workin' on fifth-dimensional semi-fractals without takin' a break?"

At what point is it worth refinancing federal grad school loans? For context: mid-career, reasonably secure job.

Federal rate: 7.69% Likely private refinance rate: under 5%.

How much should I care about the various federal loan advantages at this stage in the game, vs. just the interest rate?

SpaceX is only making a certain portion of their shares public, and they'll be weighted in the indices only on the public shares, not the entire amount.

Presumably, a billionaire only has to fail one, not both, of those to be "unethical." Either they became a billionaire via unethical means, or, having become one, they then proceed to behave unethically.

Ha. Fair call out on me for not bothering to click through the link.

Presumably for IPOs, there's some sort of delay before they get plugged into the indices? Or is it immediate as soon as the opening bell rings (for the ones including it)?

Yeah, I was thinking much more of the interpretation that the initial reading-taking.

Didn't Ben and Jerries have to get rid of their 10x rule for CEO after they were unable to find anyone qualified for the role who was also willing to take that salary?

I wonder how its radiological abilities compare to ultrasonic nondestructive testing analysis? Seems like a similar field, and I believe it was getting touted for the latter as well.

I have a hunch that the "people claiming there are no ethical billionaires" and "people who think Rowling is unethical (being a TERF)" is a venn diagram that's pretty close to a circle.

... what? Then what's the point of Jesus if there's no original sin? I admit to not having kept up with my theological studies lately, but why do those other Christians believe Jesus died if not "for our sins"? Is it just "the sins committed while alive, so therefore in theory a perfectly virtuous person would not need Jesus"?

I can understand where theyre coming from, but it almost makes it into some kind of insane game show: "Okay, you're here for the screening? I'll just need you to sign here to acknowledge that at any point prior to seeing the results, you can abort no problems/no judgement, but once you see the results, if they have any negstive attributes, any abortion becomes morally unjustifiable - although if the screening says they'll be perfect. You can still abort at will. So keep the folder sealed until you're 100% sure you either want the child or are willing to be branded a Nazi to get rid of it!"

How can you argue from Christianity and also argue the fetus is innocent? It has as much expected original sin as you do.

Innocent under the laws of man. As I understand it, nowhere in Christianity does it say "your neighbor (like yourself, and all people) has original sin, and therefore you should punish them".

For whatever reason, my gut feeling of my friends is that the ones who are most vocal about being pro-abortion are also the most vocal about being anti-screening. It seems like "abortions are no problem, unless you're doing so because the future child would have a disability". I guess it's reconcilable as being against dehumanizing people with disabilities?

we allow AI to choose our candidates for us because they can make far better and more informed decisions than the lumpen mass of the common people.

I mean, that is a tremendously low bar.

club promoter

Side note, but is this actually a job? Or just a fig leaf for payments? Like, what does a "club promoter" actually do? I can imagine a few legitimate things (put up flyers, social media programs, etc.), but I have a weird and baseless hunch none of what I'm thinking is what this fellow was doing.

Historically, weren't there societies that maintained a pretty significant distinction between the two parties in even a consensual interaction? Or is that just another pop history myth?

It's a pretty solid take, but one thing stands out as odd:

Since he's a true believer, I doubt he cares whether SpaceX suffers that much

By all accounts, isn't he also as much or moreso a true believer in space exploration, specifically trying to get to Mars?

Presumably there's something to do with the former Empire relationship.

I'm so dull that I use QQQM as my "fun speculation stock picking" minor percentage.

xAI is interesting but I have no idea if frontier models will be profitable and it’s going to burn a ton of cash.

If it were just SpaceX, I'd probably buy the IPO. The inclusion of xAI is what has me balking, for better or for worse.

I've never heard of cooking bacon in water in my life.

My Slovak grandmother taught me that the best way to cook the thick slanina bacon was to put it in the oven, in a dish with some water and black pepper, and I can absolutely vouch for the effectiveness of that method.

I know that 14th edition of Bartlett's Familiar Quotations is considered peak, but it's not quite an encyclopedia (but should still be part of every household!)

Man, someone predicted and hated fanfiction.

I get asked, almost every day, where I'm from. By people talking to me in person too, mind you.

So far, people have told me I sound American, Canadian, Dutch, German and god knows what else. The standard consensus seems to be from exactly wherever they're not, so Americans wonder if I'm Canadian/European, and Europeans wonder if I'm from the other side of the pond.

... are you me? In my case, it's the result of years of speech therapy when I was young.