Mantergeistmann
No bio...
User ID: 323
Tits/teats are animal parts.
When feminists brought up these concepts, I never interpreted them as meaning that a book that fails the Bechdel test is automatically bad, nor that a book in which a female character exists only to get murdered to motivate the male protagonist is automatically bad
Whereas the only times I ever saw it used was to imply or outright state that the book/show/game was bad and wrong.
Every 'Want' Has Another Person's Name In It: This one is an audit at the book level. List every named woman in your manuscript. For each one, write a single sentence saying what she wants [you think "what a person wants" can be reduced to a single sentence?? - ed.]. Then look at how many of those sentences have another character's name in them.
Funnily enough, in The Stars My Destination, the male lead fails this test. What does Gully Foyle want? Until the very very end, only two things, really: To kill Vorga (which he then has to be taught (by a woman) means "the people behind/crewing her, not the hunk of metal ship itself"), and to have Olivia Presteign. I mean, there's also a point where he wants to escape, and a point where he wants to not be on fire, but that's a temporary situation which I assume doesn't count. I guess the film "Taken" also falls into the gender reversed category, huh?
I can't actually think of a single book I've read where the pattern is as she describes it, I must say.
Its especially not a free speech issue since presumably there are plenty of other organizations she could have given the money to. UNRWA, for instance, hasn't been designated a terrorist organization (that I know of), and they're kind of the official Palestinian-helping org.
The project 2025 in dem messaging was a hallucination that had nothing to do with it.
Not nothing. A decent chunk of the messaging was verbatim quotes, some taken out of context, some not.
For example I guess that the new Anduril Arsenal-2 navy shipyards contract in Baltimore would not have happened without this kind of post-DOGE restructuring.
I'm not so sure about that. The USN is... well, not desperate, but they're having to scale up construction massively for tbe AUKUS program, and I feel like they'd have thrown money at anyone with a decent plan and a lobbyist or two in DC.
I think Jack Chick used that same philosophy as a comment about the Bible and the Catholic Church in his classic Death Cookie comic tract.
I've seen at least a few people argue "let the sports bodies decide", only to change course once those bodies disagreed with them
I love the graph of "should states decide their own laws on gay marriage?" and how it completely flips as soon as the Supreme Court weighs in.
If deliberate, disrespect to what many consider an important symbol of the country (and cause to doubt her loyalty). If accidental, a lack of attention to detail, knowledge, and/or care about what many consider an important symbol of the country (and cause to doubt her loyalty).
I'm inclined to think it has neither of the two above implications/interpretations, and was just a standard mistake by someone and not a big deal (how many FAITHFUL AND LOYAL politicians would have paid attention and noticed?). The fact that her campaign responded to the allegations by making a deepfake, however... well, it could have been a panic response, but it does shift my beliefs closer to "deliberate, showing a lack of respect/loyalty".
My understanding from the writeup is that the pamphlet group and the website being linked to are separate orgs, with the pamphlet group being the "false flag".
the Transgender Education Network of Texas, or TENT
How legitimate was this group? Aka how were they received/perceived/reported on prior to this latest dust-up? Is the whole thing like "linking to the DSA's policy pages", or more "linking to a fake organization that parrots the discourse of (or is at least similar to) a real one"?
For context, I've played (and enjoyed) Bloodstained, Aria of Sorrow, Dawn of Sorrow, Order of Ecclesia, and now (through the demo) of Belmont's Curse. I have not, however, played any of the Soulslikes, where I understand making the boss run back is a significant and deliberate part of the game.
I mean, Carmilla's design says it wasn't a rating-driven decision.
ME2 was debatably the last good game BioWare ever created, so that may have been some of the cracks showing before the steep descent to the depths of Veilguard.
The main storyline of ME2 (aka pretty much everything to do with Cerberus and/or the Collectors) was where Bioware's writing started its downhill tumble, so...
Why wouldn't you just go to the settings and enable "respawn at boss doors"?
By "cheat engine", are you referring to the Belmont's Curse in-game settings?
This new Castlevania has difficulty sliders. Which I appreciate? Like, maybe I don't derive value or enjoyment from four screens of running back to a boss I died to, and prefer respawning right outside the room.
You mean beyond the roboadvisors that are out there? I assume there will at least always be a human to rubber stamp the AI's decisions, for accountability purposes.
I think Rose (in game, not cover art) looks fine?
says in casual passing alhamdullilah and mashallah and inshallah brother
I'm unironically a fan of the phrase "X and inshallah", when used to refer to not having any damn plan. Sounds niftier than "X and pray".
Used to be, kind of still is, depending on the context? Can also refer to Environmentalist Commies (green outside, red inside), or pro-Palestinians (presumably watermelons were/are grown in Palestine, and the flag has red/green/black like a watermelon w/seeds?).
Yokohama Kaidashi Kikou
I have nothing to add, just that I always love seeing any mention of it.
You mean the world order where one country gets to blow up neutral ships as much as they want, and not a single country lifts a finger?
Well, per the laws of the sea, it's the responsibility of the flag nations (and only the flag nations) to respond. So flagless ships have no recourse. Or are you referring to Iran striking shipping?
Or the one where one country builds hundreds of artificial islands in the ocean and harasses anyone who gets close, and not a single country lifts a finger?
Yeah, I really wish there'd be a ton more pushback here, but there's sadly pretty much zero political will. Or public knowledge.
Or maybe it's the one where one country gets to turn another into a giant open-air prison, and not a single country lifts a finger?
Which one is this? I've heard people refer to Gaza that way, but it's a pretty false description.
Surprised he isn't getting involved in REGENT's Seaglider ferries, then, but I guess he doesn't live anywhere they'd be useful.
- Prev
- Next

Great heroes need great villains, or at least great obstacles to overcome. The stakes and challenges have to be aligned to the abilities of the characters.
More options
Context Copy link