FlyingLionWithABook
Has a C. S. Lewis quote for that.
No bio...
User ID: 1739
To me it feels demeaning because it implies that if I use ai, that the content produced using it does not belong to me.
Legally, it isn’t: ai produced works have no copyright protection.
If you buy ingredients to make sandwiches and salad at a store, you’re getting way more than 3 salads and sandwiches. More like 6-10, depending on the ingredients.
If homemade sandwich and salad costs you $10, you’re doing it wrong. When I was young and early in my career I aimed at $3.00 per meal and usually got there. Today it’s more like $6.00.
I think you’re right, but I also read the disclaimer as saying “this isn’t AI”. It’s pretty bad communication to say that something is “not one shotted into an AI” to mean “this was written by an AI”. I guess he assumed it would be obvious that it was AI written, so he didn’t need to actually say it? But I ended up reading far too much of it before realizing it was, precisely because I thought the disclaimer was saying that it wasn’t.
Who are those leaders and what is their relationship with the US and the UN?
Kim Jong Un, Xi, Salman bin Abdulaziz, Putin, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, it’s a pretty long list.
Wouldn’t the same logic apply to North Korea, Iran, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, and many more members of the UN? If the UN’s purpose is to “do something” when states violate moral principles, then there won’t be many member states left.
How will a teenager be benefited from Novus Angelus? Klee may have been a great artist, but did he use his talents to create something helpful or harmful to his fellow man in this case? Fritz Haber was a brilliant and accomplished scientist, but that doesn’t mean his work creating chemical weapons wasn’t evil.
Scott treats "sensory pleasure" as essentially an unexamined, irreducible primitive, the bedrock of certainty that would be left over once one has abstracted away everything "extraneous": as though it were simply obvious to oneself when one finds an artwork to be "pleasant" or "beautiful" in the first place, as though it would be impossible or undesirable to call these modes of experience into question, to become unsure of and estranged from one's own perceptual experience.
Yes Chad. It is indeed simply obvious when you find a piece of art to be pleasant or beautiful. When I visit an art museum, I look at the art, and I am immediately struck by beauty. Some pieces literally take my breath away when I see them: I gasp and stare at it slack-jawed. It would be undesirable and unnatural to try to change yourself so that you find beautiful things ugly, and ugly things beautiful. Some things deserve a reaction of awe and delight, and some things deserve a reaction of disgust and repellence, and if you don’t have that reaction something is wrong with you, the same way something is wrong with a man who is tone death or color blind.
Pettiest?
I would sleep in every day, then go back in time just far enough to get to work on time.
It used to be a significant source of tension in my marriage: if I was driving with my wife, she would often criticise my performance. She would have said she was giving helpful advice: the fact that I took it as criticism was undoubtedly the reason her “backseat driving” was the cause of more fights between us than just about anything else.
In the end I resolved it by recognizing that I don’t really like driving, while my wife enjoys it. So I just let her drive when we’re together and we get along fine. Though I am thoroughly convinced that I’m a better driver than her, I am happy to let her do the driving if it means that I can rest and we stop sniping at each other.
As far as the gender question goes, it reminds me of a quote by C.S. Lewis:
A woman means by Unselfishness chiefly taking trouble for others; a man means not giving trouble to others.
Sinking the ships of any nation is likely to piss them off and attack you.
That doesn’t seem to be the case these days, at least when Iran is the one sinking the ships.
This is a ludicrous assessment. Iran caved to Trump’s threats, and if they don’t give him what he wants the bombings will pick right back up in two weeks. Trump played a game of chicken, and Iran blinked first.
I feel great about it. Iran chickened out and submitted to Trumps threats, and if they aren’t willing to give up the uranium before the two weeks are up, the USS Gerald Ford will be there to support the next round of bombing. This is a win for the US, and people painting it as an Iran win are nuts. If one guy is pounding someone’s face in the dirt while yelling “Say uncle or I’m going to break your arm”, and the guy in the dirt yelps “uncle!”, that’s not a victory for him. Quite the opposite.
The adults in the room on the Republican side are Mitt Romney, Robert Dole and John McCain, and the latter two are starting to smell a bit.
I imagine McCain is smelling quite a bit, since he has been dead for several years now. My question is why his rotting corpse is in the room.
The benefit is leverage in peace negotiations, and if there is peace the strait won’t be closed anymore. The Karg island facilities are extremely valuable to Iran in peacetime, which makes them worth taking in times of war.
Controlling the island gives you leverage in negotiations. You want your oil refineries back? Then play ball. Or in the best case scenario you can hand it over to a new friendly regime.
And yeah, Iran can launch all kinds of things, if they’re fine up blowing up their own refineries in the process.
Ha! One did, back in my college days.
Eh. Depends on your definition. I’ve been at small churches and bigger churches over the years. Current church is on the big side, but I don’t know if it’s “mega”. I’m not sure how many members we have exactly, but there are two different service times and several hundred people at each service. Plus there’s a “satellite campus” on the other side of town, and another one up in the valley.
The Trump admin is consistently giving the American people the runaround as for why the war started, what they hope to achieve, and what the end conditions are.
I see people making this argument everywhere and I’m baffled. The have made it very clear why the war started and what our war goals are. They’ve been holding press conferences every day where they explain it! Proper press conferences, where they actually take questions! It’s like seeing someone argue that we shouldn’t land on the moon because it’s too purple. It’s…it’s obviously not! The Trump admin has not been shy about this! I mean just two days ago Pete had this to say:
”On day ten of Operation Epic Fury, we are winning with an overwhelming and unrelenting focus on our objectives, which are the same as the day I gave my first briefing here on Operation Epic Fury. They're straightforward and we are executing them with ruthless precision.
One: destroy their missile stockpiles, their missile launchers and their defense industrial base; missiles and their ability to make them. Two: destroy their Navy. And three: permanently deny Iran nuclear weapons forever. It's a laser focused, maximum authority mission delivered with overwhelming and unrelenting precision, no hesitation, no half measures.”
I feel like I’m going crazy. People really do love in different worlds.
like duh, megachurch Evangelicals do not want to engage in philosophical political discussion.
Speak for yourself! Some Evangelicals get C.S. Lewis-Pilled.
My understanding is that while Xi purged Zhang and Liu in January, the National People’s Congress have so far declined to remove their delegate status. Normally purge victims are stripped of their status pretty quick, and it was expected that would happen during the NPC’s February meeting, but it didn’t. So either they didn’t vote on it, or they voted on it and it didn’t pass. Legally speaking NPC delegates can’t be formally investigated the way Zhang and Liu have been. So this could be an act of resistance against Xi, refusing to make his actions against the generals retroactively legal, the way they usually have in the past.
This analysis is nuts. Xi just purged his top two generals, and the CCP looks like it’s actually going to stand up to him about that. China is in no position to go to war, especially after finding out from Venezuela and Iran that Chinese radars can’t beat American stealth. Before the war we were assured that Iranian missiles would quickly overwhelm our interceptors, and we’ve instead found that we can wipe out Iranian missile launcher sites while keeping our carriers safe and sound. Iran is getting crushed, and they resorted to putting the impotent son of the old Ayatollah in charge, the one who is so incompetent that his dad specifically ordered in his will that he not be put in charge. Oil is cheaper now than it was in 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine, and it looks to stay that way.
The only part of this analysis I agree with is that the Iran war makes war with China much less likely, because China would be crazy to try to take Taiwan now that they’ve seen how outmatched they would be, and that Trump is willing to break things and let the chips fall where they may.
Cake and Pepperidge Farm brand bread products are luxuries you have to earn.
I mean…obviously yes? I don’t even buy store bought cake or Pepperidge Farm bread, and I’m not on the dole. Why should my tax dollars pay for your luxuries? Nobody has a moral right to cookies!
How fast can you now build a house if it's all AI?
Funnily enough, it seems like the task that makes house construction take the longest is getting permits to build, and filling out or approving applications seems like something LLMs might actually be able to make faster.
- Prev
- Next

They sign over limited copyrights: the right to make copies for these specific purposes, in these specific times and places. But it’s rare for them to sign over copyright entirely: that is, to give up their own right to make copies of the work.
Source: my brother was a professional freelance artist for over a decade.
More options
Context Copy link