FistfullOfCrows
No bio...
User ID: 930
They can all go fuck themselves as far as I'm concerned they have literally NOONE left on that network even remotely close to being human. Gutfeld comes close but his writing staff is milktoast as fuck.
FILTHY FUCKING PORNOGRAPHY.
Nice.
They got bought by the owner of Telemundo around the time of the Trump VS Hilldawg election. It's been churning out unfunny democrat agitprop ever since. The old writers were absolute masters absurdist comedy.
The interface also wasn't complete trash like it currently is. Some of the older barely web 2.0 with very sparing use of js versions were way better.
Is lolcow news a service? If there was an ongoing internet kerfuffle there would be updates there. Often from primary sources and people directly or peripherally involved.
They could at least TRY, you know. Right now there are editors on wikipedia that have bloody hammers and sickles on their profile bios. And nobody bats an eye when they edit some bullshit with their political bent.
There's conservapedia. Just nobody uses it.
simply hire a cadre of busty women who would stand in the beer aisle at the grocery store wearing an American Flag bikini and offering to fellate anyone who bought a case. Boom. Apology accepted.
We need to get prostitution legalized and in the constitution. Because frankly, we DESERVE to have our dicks fellated at the mart.
murder is cowardice
What an absolute soycuck tier shit to say and feel as if you've said something profound. I've lost the last bit of respect I didn't even know I still had for Bill Maher.
Capitalism can work. Not so sure on the free trade. A level of protectionism is needed because people aren't just fungible objects that will emigrate on the dime to "better work environments". Some would. But on the whole that's a destructive state of affairs.
It will improve the world so so much.
It so definitely wouldn't. If it ever becomes a viable technology be ready for HUNKY GRADE-A BEEF Jarheads, coming of an assembly line, roided up naturally and ready to fight in endless wars.
and lots of the deep state genuinely mean what they say about supporting democracy around the world.
Press X to doubt. Are we talking about the same deep state that believes in "democracy" and "fighting misinformation" but only when they get their way? How about that deepstate that can't help itself dethrone democratically elected leaders for purely monetary (even banana republic tier) and geopolitical goals?
Maybe i'm a bit naive here but what exactly are they going to be repressing? Both sides speak the same language, have roughly the same genetic makeup, eat the same foods, have the same religion. What are they going to be repressing? Waving the flag? Wearing blue jeans?
Yep.
claims that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara have a legal contract between them that gives her sweeping control over core aspects of Israelās national affairs
This is the most jewish concept I've read about in a year. A "contract" between her and her husband for control of isreal?????
The squad
The squad are also a very bad example. They folded like paper tigers when it came to re-electing Nancy Pelosi as House speaker. They could have used their leverage to secure medicare for all or do any number of things they stated they would do. They chose not to. They are completely in the DEM machine's pocket.
The article on Cultural Marxism/Frankfurt school was deleted and redirected to a "Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory" article by a self avowed god damned Marxist. Their profile on wikipedia stated their proud support for Marxism. This is the kind of shit that goes on in wikipedia. The inmates run the asylum.
On the other hand, there is no way to write a gun control law that takes ethnicity into account without making it completely obvious that you are running an ethno-state and thus looking really bad to a lot of people in the broader world.
But they are already running an ethno-state. No outsider considers it not to be an ethnic state unless they are making PR mouth noises pretending to the contrary.
would it be worthwhile to do so
No. Striking violently and possibly in a suicidal way to achieve taking your oppressor's life is paramount. Sacrosanct. I would not want to live with a people who have had this urge lobotomized out of them. Indeed I would look at them as lesser beings.
Skin color should no more determine your more relevant qualities than the shade of lipstick you choose to wear.
Yeah, that's never going to happen. We don't have full control of our genes and I'm going to bet even slight tweaks to skin color will have a measurable effect on intelligence. (In either way. Who knows, maybe 300% melanin will actually make us hyper intelligent or whatever).
Whatever genes you alter to change faces, hair, body size. Literally any structural or outward appearance of a human will also alter their brains. It's all interconnected.
Iām not convinced the media has the ability to black out a candidate who would genuinely have widespread appeal anyways,
Sure it can. Google has proven itself more than capable and willing to put a finger on the scales of goog search and youtube. Legacy media is owned by like 3 companies or so. If "they" really wanted to. "They" could blackball a candidate. Right now only Twitter of the mass media is "based" enough to resist such a political deplatforming campaign.
It's extremely preoccupied with "REPRESENTATION" and general left leaning things. But I'd grant you its not infected with brainworms level of political toxoplasmosis.
Breadpanes, which is extremely cringe. And also coincidentally and humorously also suffers from walls-o-text.
This whole debacle sounds like an episode of
The Thick of It
but in Australia instead of the UK.More options
Context Copy link