non vaccine skepticism, non-full fat capitalist, non-HBD, non-raceblindness, historical revisionism, non-isolationism, etc.
Those are the ones that always get me negative internet good boy points.
The ones where I usually even out to zero are being non-Christiaan nationalist and antitheist, or supporting the left side on any culture war topic (eg, it was bad that Neely got choked to death, etc.).
Ukraine is an interesting one; I get wildly different reactions on being a strong anti Neo-Imperial Russia mark depending on who is online that day.
Negative attention is still attention, negative affection is still affection. True MGTOW behavior is a Isaac Newton style absolute 0 on the number line, not a -10. If you feel the need to label yourself MGTOW, if you put any serious amount of thought or energy into it, you are making an own goal at the first pass.
It's that meditation problem of Not thinking about Not thinking.
I post because It's a place where I can easily get negative engagement with my values. EDIT: COHERENT negative engagement; I can just look at blue check twitter if I want drooling morons who disagree with me.
The majority of people here are wrong on the facts and have bad axioms from my standpoint, but I might be wrong. So, I come here every now and again to look at the people that disagree with me to see if I disagree with them.
Does anyone have any recently updated not wildly partisan adversarial stuff re. HBD/IQ inheritance/IQ measurement/ The whole salami?
This is kinda specific, I'm after a single place where there are people disagreeing with each others sources and arguments directly; preferably experts or at least people who can reference experts.
You need the library, then.
Borrowing a book isn't a substitute for all the services that having a library with librarians in situe provides, is my point.
How poor were you?
Eg, I didn't have any internet access in the house I lived in until most of the way through highschool, where was I supposed to teach myself?
I think you kinda missed the entire point of the post, and the metaphor.
I will explain it less off the cuff: Performing masculinity is easy for me, I've never had any angst over it. Thus, I feel contempt for men for whom it is not easy. Then, I remember normal mind bias and realize that my feelings are as justified as me feeling contempt for a dude with palsy not being able to lift what I can lift, and that it is unfair.
I wish I had your aesthetic sense, only I don't because I actually enjoy almost everything BUT airport architecture. Maybe I wish I had both our aesthetic senses?
I'm that fuckin autist that climbs down the service ladder to look at the bottom of the culvert and go "Wow! Big concrete pipe! Amazing!"
I can't agree with you on the stripmall/parking aesthetic, though. I think it's the fact that it they are built without any consideration for anything, not even for cost. They are actually usually way more expensive than they need to be, both over the long term and the short.
'Cause libraries are where people with high IQ teach themselves in between being with the herd in class.
They don't matter to room temperature IQ types, but they are extremally important to poor kids that win the intelligence lottery.
I know this isn't helpful, but my flinch reaction to dudes who have masculinity problems is to scoff and feel contempt.
Like, what's so fucking hard about it? And then I remember normal mind bias and tell myself that what I just said is "Listen, picking up heavy stuff is easy! Just lift more than you can lift!"
I will say that building your masculinity on the attention of a particular woman or women in general is cuck behavior, and needs to be discouraged wherever possible. Even the MGTOW dudes still construct their whole identity around women, you gotta stop that shit.
But that runs into "Just stop feeling that way! Lift more than you can lift!" again.
Seconding this, and emphasizing that stoicism doesn't mean passivity; it means really truly internalizing that sometimes "You want it to be one way. But it's the other way".
You can try to change it, but you gotta accept reality first.
HISD to eliminate librarians and convert libraries into disciplinary centers at NES schools
Not worth a post as top level thread on it's own; but hilariously dystopic enough to post here. It's only one (admittedly large and important) SD, but this is the type of shit Margret Atwood would write about as a totally out there thought experiment.
Hopefully enough people get mad it stops there.
Strongly against, and leftist-leftist.
I also hate the way shit looks now, but only in the sense that it all converges towards the platonic airport. I'd rather have an ugly building than a boring building.
Bill Bryson's body of work is as grass-touching as books can be; specifically recommend A Walk in the Woods for your criteria.
It's a narrative/comedic/ecological/historical account of the authors hike along the Appalachian trail.
That is a really excellent outcome! I like the 1/8" strip idea; it really ads definition to the shape. Good choices all around here. Also mad jealous of your lumber yard; I only have access to good selections and prices on red and white oak or hyper rare weird tropical woods; maple walnut and cherry are way overpriced where I am.
Re. Miter angles:
I made 45 degree vertical and horizontal shooting boards and creep up to the line with a hand plane; results in a prefect, repeatable result every time; and it's very satisfying.
RE. Shellac:
I strongly recommend mixing your own. Shellac flakes have a shelf live much longer than yours, no more bad cans. I like to mix a supper light first coat of shellac, almost treating it like a sealer instead of a finish; then I'll do coats of with increasing amounts of shellac to denat until I'm at the level of coated-in-glass I like.
My understanding with most protestant/baptist denominations is that they throw out all the symbology and rituals like the Eucharist, which is kind of not what I'm looking for at the moment. Is that wrong?
The factual complete answer is: Ehhhhhhhhhhhh???
Some Baptist churches are all fire and brimstone politics from the pulpit; the one I went attended/was baptized at spent a month of 3 hour sermons with a break in the middle for eating what you bought at the bake sale split between Communion, choral music with mandatory participation by everyone in the church, and drilling down on a single chapter/section of verses/verse with a gosh darn debate component.
Basically, it's very uneven. It could be that the type of church I imagine is dead and gone with the generation that attended them and they all turned into boomers and hyperstimulus.
My main position is that you gotta really know what you are getting into if you go for a catholic or orthodox church; you gotta know that the main thing your are signing up for is ritual and not religion. The religion part doesn't take place in the church.
Those are not the same thing, my dude.
You should probably do a bit of research on that old world religion; and also consider looking around for a non-evangelical church near you.
The more trad protestant denominations can be good if you really like digging down on scripture instead of more rote sermons. (Baptists et all)
The only reason I'm not in the "all Christians are room temperature IQ morons" edgy boy camp is because I got taken to a Baptist church during my formative years.
The premise begs the question here, IMO. Reality is a deserted island; there is nowhere you can run to to escape the reaper because he lives inside you (skeleton joke).
I'd say that it is entirely individual. I've seen aetheists shrug off the their inevitable brain cancer end, I've seen Christians kill themselves with stress worrying about loss of kidney function and heart problems.
You are doing the hardest thing there is to do in programing: Anything other than programing.
I'm not reading all that lol (actually I don't know jack about shit when it comes to pixies, it's all magic to me once people start talking about ohms. I'll wait for someone I know with a full fat engineering degree to offer an opinion)
For real though: Those are Korean names and I know they do a decent amount of boring hard physical research there, so I'm upgrading my +-1% prediction to a slightly stronger +-1%.
EDIT: SHIT FUCK SHIT someone who knows about pixies thinks it might be real (15-20%) noooooo my fake internet Nostradamus points
No, you don't understand, my billionaire bunker will be different! All my hired muscle will surely stay loyal after fiat currency collapses
True enough, but most people seem to think that difrent flavors of C+ are A+. They're out there livin that premium mediocre life.
I appreciate the pun, but there is no flex in living that prol mdf furniture life.
When you pay IKEA 100 for 10 worth of material and labor, you are getting fleeced. Better to pay 1000 for 500 worth of materials and labor.
Yes, because fuck neo classical architecture. It sucks now and it sucked then.
We have a bunch of home grown styles that are better anyway; eg frank furnace and such. There is no need to make everything an austere roman larp.
Missing some Russian and French classics (And so am I, I'm trying to read them also); Dostoyevsky/Pushkin, Dumas. Dostoyevsky is especially interesting IMO.
I was gonna say Cervantes but you got em there already; I think Don Quixote is important as fuck in a literary sense.
King James is a political as fuck translation, and is worth reading in that context IMO.
More options
Context Copy link