@Celestial-body-NOS's banner p

Celestial-body-NOS

🟦 All human beings are equal, **even when they aren't.**

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:16:31 UTC

				

User ID: 290

Celestial-body-NOS

🟦 All human beings are equal, **even when they aren't.**

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:16:31 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 290

β€Ž
β€Ž

Maybe he was using a SEP field?

What if the Gros Michel banana specifically contained some protein that could have cured malaria

Like the Cinchona tree?

So you consider it fair for Bob, if he cannot swallow his pride, to be publicly humiliated, without any way of avoiding the situation beforehand, but not right for Alice, if she is incapable of swallowing her pride, to be expected to pursue a different career?

he can grumble about how β€œthis is bullshit”

And, in your view, is it a violation of his rights for him to suffer any consequences for grumbling and complaining while complying?

Obviously I am not saying that nobody ever gets pulled over despite not actually being guilty of the suspected offense.

Alice suspects Bob has done something wrong. Bob hasn't. If the onus is placed on Alice, she can avoid it by pursuing a different career. If it is placed on Bob, and Bob is not capable of stifling his indignation, is there some way for Bob to avoid being attacked in your proposed system?

"Generally speaking" isn't good enough. In this example, Bob didn't do anything wrong.

Denying that individual human beings matter, rather than the 'general' state of the community, is another path lined with skulls.

How exactly do you propose that a society of subsistence farmers build WMDs?

When Officer Alice interacts with ordinary citizen Bob, Alice could have opted out of the situation by pursuing a different career. Unless there is a similar way for Bob to opt out of the interaction, imposing on Alice a requirement, which not everyone is capable of fulfilling, is fairer than imposing the same requirement on Bob, as the former case allows those who cannot fulfil said requirement to exist in some other societal role, while the latter does not allow them to exist at all.

Admittedly this argument is dependent on the proposition that There Is No Such Thing As A Human Being Who Is Unworthy Of Life; however, societies which reject this axiom tend to feature piles of skulls.

Why is it the responsibility of the officers to be calm and gentle

Because if they can't, they have the option of pursuing a different career.

Even assuming that today's inhabitants of the Global South are "dysgenic", how certain are we that, a hundred years hence, their descendants will be?

If the poor outcomes among certain ethnic groups are caused by genetic factors, we will soon be able to identify, repair, and possibly improve them beyond what has appeared naturally.

Concerns about "dysgenics" could be regarded by the people of the 26th century as we now look at the predictions of Malthus, or the horse-manure crisis!

...what worked for the past 5,000 years.

Worked for whom?

I think a lot of women would dispute that it worked for them!

(But the soul is still oracular; amid the market’s din

List the ominous stern whisper, from the Delphic cave within

They enslave their children’s children who make compromise with sin.)

(β€œIt’s not a β€˜compromise with sin’, per se, just denying the humanity of half the world.”)

(…)

(β€œOkay, fine, whatever, maybe it’s kind of a compromise with sin.”)

it is their ... opinion that your needs don't matter

It is my opinion that if you ever find yourself telling someone this, you should take a long look in the mirror (assuming that you show up in one).

I can't imagine tolerating this

I have revised downward my priors for your having had children.

Edit: Missed the part where you mention "My oldest". I have now revised substantially upward.

If you were a time traveler who didn't know what the Nazis had done

Or an alien.

if you're looking at it from a "pure safety perspective" you ... should probably just stay home.

I thought an alarmingly large percentage of accidents happen in or near the home....

G. K. Chesterton made a similar point a century ago.

If the common man in the past had a grave respect for property, it may conceivably have been because he sometimes had some of his own.

Until they figure out how to clone organs, and transgender individuals start getting new reproductive systems installed....

I believe this is known as the Violinist Argument.

Trying to force changes in consumer behavior that don't adequately meet the demands of the consumer doesn't usually work well.

even if they could use the exercise, you can’t expect people to walk 15 blocks just to go out to eat.

This is an example of Squareallworthy's Law of Societal Change.

train every citizen into a reserve officer.

Robert Peel approves.

I wonder if film will make a comeback. ("I'll believe it when I see the negatives.")

Eliminate the minimum wage...eliminate welfare....

I'm going to invoke Chesterton's fence on this one (although there are some possibilities for different fences).

told stories of Mohammedans trying to vote for their wives.

Now that's a name I haven't heard in a loooong time.

Maybe Zelensky's been reading Sun Tzu? ("attack some other place that he will be obliged to relieve", 6:11)

The message to ordinary Russians, particularly those in Kursk and adjacent, is that the war can come for them too. It also makes Putin and co. look less secure and in control. It's probably not going to break the camel's back, but if you're in the business of camel-back breaking you take the straws you can get.

It also takes uti possetidis off the table....