Botond173
8hr ago
Which is just another case of a news report alienating the normies even further.
Botond173
9hr ago
It was developed by Gramsci for his fellow Marxist-Leninist cadre. Otherwise he is dead and forgotten by everyone besides dissident rightist political theorists. Those who have implemented it are identitarian mainstream liberals – feminists, LGBT+ activists and liberal culture warriors in general. Them coddling their own sense of intellectual superiority is beside the point. The point is that the Long March by definition represents the opposite of accelerationism. In other words, it succeeds as long as the marchers and their opponents are both decelerationists. To the extent that you ever reveal your true motivations at all, you only do so when you’re already structurally unremovable from power, when the limited but irreversible gains you’ve been steadily making reach critical mass. As OP correctly pointed it out, this assumes “that long-march leftists were simply too clever, disciplined, and coordinated to challenge directly”. What this also entails is that hardliner leftist culture warriors are to be reined in so as not to alienate the normies too soon.
Botond173
1d ago
I remember that companies cancelling people for the OK sign was a spectacle so cringy that even Bill Maher ridiculed it on his show, which is normie-friendly entertainment by anyone’s standards. When the woke overplay their hand and they come across as desperate and shrill, even the media that isn’t particularly known as anti-woke will not play along with their agenda.
Botond173
1d ago
The Gramscian concept of the Long March Through the Institutions as determined by mainstream liberals was based on the assumption that the only token right-wing opposition that will arise will come from loser cucks like Mitt Romney, John McCain or Jeb Bush. It was never supposed to be challenged by someone like Trump.
Botond173
1d ago
Cancelling people for the OK sign does have the potential to alienate normies though, provided that the anti-woke media spins it the right way.
Botond173
4d ago
Charlie Kirk was engaging in calls to coordinate state violence against his out group (ie running on political issues that would negatively effect the alphabet folks).
How did his proposals amount to coordinated state violence?
Botond173
5d ago
I'm having some trouble discerning what exactly it is you are arguing for here.
That CNN and the legacy media in general is lying through its teeth about his character and the nature of his activities, I guess.
Botond173
6d ago
The variant (if one can call it that) with the downward-pointing wings was certainly also in official use. (See this huge gallery from the Third Reich in Ruins site.) One example are the famous bronze eagles at the Luitpold Arena in Nuremberg. I have no idea what the heraldic/symbolic significance of this is, if any; I guess there were also practical considerations at play (cost, size, structural balance).
Botond173
6d ago
Botond173
6d ago
Indeed, but unlike these eagles, those predate the Italian fascist movement.
This page has a picture of Japanese-American troops in the highly-decorated 442nd wearing these coats.
It's kind of curious in this context that the US national eagle adorning the entrance of the Epinal American Cemetery, as pictured on that site, is an almost perfect copy of the Nazi imperial eagle. (The eagle decorating the entrance of the Henri-Chapelle American Cemetery in Belgium, on the other hand, is pretty much a copy of the Nazi Party eagle. The difference is kindly explained on Wikipedia.)
Botond173
6d ago
Also, Xi's half-sister was studying at a military academy (I wasn't aware that those were accepting women back then in China) and was driven to suicide during the Cultural Revolution, at least according to Wikipedia.
Botond173
6d ago
Those of them who survived to 1941 were mostly released and conscripted back to frontline service, as far as I know.
Botond173
6d ago
I'd say he made a good attempt at humor and correctly summed up what the argument of lipstick feminists would be if it was a uniformed organization mainly consisting of women that'd be the one criticized for its looks.
Also, I'm somewhat of a misogynist myself, but I'd ask you to differentiate "women" from "lipstick feminists".
Botond173
6d ago
Rounding up vagrants is I think a task that citizens' militias / vigilante groups are best suited for.
Botond173
6d ago
I thought though that playing matchmaker has traditionally been a social role assumed by older women, not by men like you.
Botond173
8d ago
Alright. I'll bite. How would you categorize them instead? Civic nationalist? Just grifters? Something else?
Botond173
8d ago
This generally seems to be one case where the sex ratio is severely distorted in one direction or the other; women’s general willingness to marry is eroded as a consequence either way. One Manosphere blogger described it thus:
“Why should I think about marriage? All guys are available.”
“Why should I think about marriage? No guys are available.”
Botond173
8d ago
They're all psychological colonies of whatever the US PMC thinks. Fuck's sake, Finland holds BLM rallies. You're all living in America.
Just found this in an older discussion that was linked to in the current thread.
Botond173
9d ago
There is no attractive sexually available 18-29 year-old alt girl willing to take direct action to fix the demographic crisis with you. She doesn't exist.
It may not be much, but I can name three real women who actually did exactly that: Eva Vlaardingerbroek, Lana Lokteff and Brittany Pettibone. If your larger point is that attractive, sexually available 18-29 year-old women are generally not interested in oppositional political activism, then I concur.
I'd assume they found the news about reprinting the yearbooks at a cost of over $50,000 due to OK signs to be cringe and lame as f***.
More options
Context Copy link