They want US bunker busters sufficient to get at Iranian reactors under mountains. That is the existential threat. The only way Israel can get to the reactors is to use nukes. Israel's terminal value is preventing Iran from getting nukes. Forcing the US's hand is the only plausible way this happens. To this end they are incentivized to continue escalating in the hope that US has to join, and attack Iran itself, at least from the air.
I'm pretty sure they just boobie trapped the apartment they knew he would be staying in.
Iran can start attacking every vessel in the strait of Hormuz and cause a global recession.
We don't know what kind of outcome Iran was aiming for last time, it might have just been a token retaliation, and thus not an accurate demonstration of their actual ability to strike Israel. If they were actually trying to strike Israel, they would first overwhelm missile defenses with rockets from Lebanon, where they have the capacity to do so. Iran's failed strike against Israel was symbolic. A real strike would start with waves of rockets from Lebanon.
That's pretty great!
Do you like her?
Darwin. You're back! Good to have you!
But that has nothing to do with Turkey bacon, which is fine.
Bezos, Musk, etc. have fortunes but that money is not making its way to me.
To the degree that they have cash it is making it's way to you about as much as any other cash, as for their wealth, that they created, they did so by creating lots of utility. I can order something online and have it the very same day. That's awesome. Thanks Jeff. You deserve all that money for doing something so awesome. You earned it! Thanks Elon for the cool cars and internet!
These are things people want (we know this because people pay them for these things).
That's the first coherent 5D chess explanation for what's going on at Twitter.
Trump AG prosecute Obama, Biden,Hilary, Fauci etc.. Also people who criticize him. People get violent. Atmosphere of fear, people are afraid that one wrong move will fracture the republic (or try to make that move because it feels virtuous given that your side is right).
Replace generals with Trump loyalists? That doesn't get you all the way there, but it helps. Then you have a choice between an internal military coup to get rid of the Trump loyalists at the top, and maybe they say that it's better to have another term of Trump than to destroy the Republic; they might be right.
You could see how they would think it's reasonable. The first term didn't count because the deep state interfered, and this makes some kind of internal sense, so this would be his first real full term, or maybe the next one, because he will need to use this one to eradicate the deep state.
Ya, I have a hard time seeing any of this happening.
Well, there is always the verboten topic of the "meme sex". Probably going to get modded again for even uttering the words.
Meme sex? What does that mean? That one sex is more susceptible to cultural programming?
Is your model that Israel is trying to kill as many people as possible? The world would look different if that were the case. There would be a lot more dead people.
The point being argued is whether or not Israel has been seeking a ceasefire - the "mowing the grass" term refers to them accepting a policy that requires going in and doing that every few years.
In response to new escalations. They they make a new ceasefire. Hamas defects. Defection escalates until they mow the grass again. Repeat the cycle. Which is the point. This cease fire, like all cease fires, would be followed by Hamas defection and escalation until they have to go in again.
"mowing the grass"
When they go in every couple of years and collapse tunnels, destroy weapons depots, and take out terrorists? What follows from that? Should they not do that?
After Israel's war with Hamas is over are they going to deliver a bunch of resources to Gaza and the West Bank to help the development of a peaceful Palestinian state? I am skeptical!
If they thought that this was a viable possibility? Maybe. I think that the hatred is a bit more entrenched than it was in Japan/Germany.
I mean, it's hard to imagine that they won't use resources to try to destroy Israel. When given a choice they have show that that is exactly what they will do.
ex-Presidents are not held to the same standards as the common man
Of course they aren't, this is priced in, it's standard wisdom. We try not to prosecute the previous president so as not to become a banana republic.
I think that the prediction markets might be pricing in things like 3rd parties, which a Trump vs Biden poll doesn't account for.
Eisman from the Big Short
YU is the equivalent of the Jewish state school, and it is far better than the meadian state school.
Why?
I don't like baseball, but I do like well crafted videos, and the you tube channel "baseball doesn't exist" has a lots of good videos that just so happen to be about baseball. So that might make a good entry point!
A rags to riches story of small backwater with big population and high birth rates has happened couple of times already.
Sure, but which of those cases ended up "substantially richer than Israel ". Israel is already one of the richest countries in the world. A random countries can't just up and make themselves richer than that because they decide to. The vast majority of functioning western countries are far poorer than Israel. You can't just decide that you want to be richer and make it so.
Fatah?
What if they were launched from a bomber?
Can you explain? Why couldn't a conventionally armed F-16, F-35, or missile without a nuclear warhead reach Iran?
- Prev
- Next
I believe that there are degrees of bunker buster missiles. What they have isn't sufficient to get through the mountains near Tehran.
More options
Context Copy link