@AlexanderTurok's banner p

AlexanderTurok

Alt-MSNBC

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2024 November 17 03:11:49 UTC

Just Another Alt-MSNBC Guy. Find me at Substack: https://alexanderturok.substack.com/

Verified Email

				

User ID: 3346

AlexanderTurok

Alt-MSNBC

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2024 November 17 03:11:49 UTC

					

Just Another Alt-MSNBC Guy. Find me at Substack: https://alexanderturok.substack.com/


					

User ID: 3346

Verified Email

He openly admits he's a eugenicist

No s***. It always circles back to DemsRRealRacist, Bible thumping, and not being very bright.

  • -12

The ones against illegal immigration.

Planned Parenthood does more than just provide abortions. If you can't see the difference between "Medicaid doesn't cover abortion" and "Medicaid can't cover non-abortion care if the provider also provides abortions" I don't know what to tell you.

Show me the statute that would make Planned Parenthood ineligible.

Democrats defected first with immigration laws

More accurate to say that it was a bipartisan phenomenon engaged in by Republicans like George W. Bush.

+1

Sometimes I forget how bad some people are at basic reading comprehension.

Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic - Abortion.

It sounds to me like Congress put a condition on federal Medicaid funding, South Carolina is ignoring it, and the Supreme Court is saying "the federal government can enforce the condition by taking away South Carolina's Medicaid funding" knowing it will not actually do so, effectively nullifying the condition Congress put in place. Maybe the court decision was right, you don't want to create a situation where the government is buried in endless lawsuits, but it certainly looks like the executive branch is just blatantly ignoring the law. If that's acceptable, I don't want to hear any complaints about Democrats refusing to enforce immigration laws.

  • -11

I'm much more about Nietzsche than Sex and the City, which I've never seen.

The kid with the e-thot was conceived naturally.

someone using natural family planning within a Catholic marriage

That isn't what the article describes.

It burned down because it was on fire.

The richest man in the world has basically the same political program you do (like literally wants everything in your list), and he's powerless to enact it for this specific reason.

Um, what? Elon Musk is modelling dysfunctional ghetto family norms.

The woman in the article is 25. She's at no risk of imminent infertility. And it's not like she's trying to conceive to avoid being childless, she's trying not to conceive using a less-effective, lower-class method due to conspiratorial ideology.

  • -11

I've been saying it for a while: it's gotten to a point where saying "having a kid out of wedlock is a bad idea" is left-coded.

  • -15

Did you miss the "natural family planning" in there? Google it if you don't know what it means.

  • -17

Alas, sneering at the actual TRUE things conspiracy theorists

It's true but irrelevant.

Yes, fixed.

Nerdy men were the first to get access to internet pornography, and for a while it was associated with them. Now guys in the slums of Nigeria are watching it on smartphones. Nerds were the first to have access to online conspiracy content. Jet Fuel Can't Melt Steel Beams! Muh Magic Bullet! Now the same conspiracy stuff is hitting young women. From an NYT report about a women's conference:

Rhaelynn Zito is one such conservative convert. Ms. Zito is a 25-year-old nurse who lives in Raleigh, N.C. In 2023, she said she had a real belly flop of a year. She went through a breakup, lost a family member and was searching for purpose outside work. Ms. Zito began listening to Ms. Clark, whose Turning Point USA show is often ranked among the top ten of health podcasts on Spotify.

Listening to Ms. Clark, Ms. Zito said, changed her life. She started a Bible study group, cut down her drinking and stopped dating casually as she focused on finding a husband. She stopped using birth control, taking up a natural family planning method recommended on Ms. Clark's show, and became dubious about abortions and vaccines. She no longer identifies as a feminist.

{sinp}

After the 2024 election, when young men swung markedly to Mr. Trump, pundits and political operatives began a frenzied and almost anthropological analysis of the "manosphere," the ecosystem of podcasters, like Joe Rogan and Theo Von, who nudged young men toward the Republican vote. Less in focus were the young women — a demographic that is still reliably left-leaning, but whose support for Mr. Trump also increased, according to post-election polling. Some were also swayed by what has been labeled a "womanosphere" of uber popular podcasters blending lifestyle advice and political polemics.

Many of the young women at the Turning Point conference were drawn to the event because conservative women influencers had helped them remake their lives: start dating seriously and stop eating ultra-processed foods, start taking supplements and stop using birth control. The Young Women's Leadership Summit, which marked its tenth anniversary, drew its largest numbers yet this year: roughly 3,000 women, up from around 2,000 last year and under 500 in 2015, at its inception. The event, some attendees noted, was light on discussions about policy — immigration raids, trade wars — but heavy on dating, parenting and nutrition advice.

Women are more hostile to COVID vaccination, perhaps reflecting a female urge to make politics revolve around their bodies.

Many people here have been asking about my politics: it's actually remarkably simple: I want the old America back where children were born within marriage, didn't try to change their gender, and got all the vaccines their pediatrician recommended.

To Rightists with daughters reading this: are you concerned that they might encounter "natural family planning" on the internet and really f*** up their life?

  • -10

Yet like Cassandra, they're cursed to have the rest of the world not believe them.

Maybe that has something to do with their messaging or decisions about which issues to prioritize?

My concern is that I’ve never really heard of a secular society with those kinds of restrictions on sexuality; the only places that successfully curtail premarital sex do so explicitly through a religious point of view.

Confucianism. You could ad-hoc define it as a religion along with communism, liberalism, etc., but then the statement is tautologically true.

it's just that to institute such a system you just need to explode half of Europe.

You don't make yourself rich by making other people poor.

Race and IQ is far more suppressed than anti-porn, and yet the studies keep getting published.

Maybe the anti-porn side can't find it because it isn't there.

In my experience a lot of young men would actually like to get married

Yes, and they too would be alienated by the tradcon message that puts 100% of the blame for the decline in marriage on men.

They rely on cheap dopamine fixes and are stuck in perpetual adolescence because of structural problems in the economy and the education system

The unemployment rate is close to zero.

You are listing 90s and 2000s culture war topics.

Right, and there are a lot of people who want to go back and re-litigate those same fights. Some of them are in this thread.

Solid statistical evidence is a pretty recent invention, and its accessibility to the public even more recent. In the meantime humans live human lives and require human guidance.

People have been asking about my political ideology and this pretty much sums it up: the first-world is better than the third-world. It's a good thing that we're not burning witches anymore. But you all are so concerned with "third-world immigrants" you can't see the third-worlding occurring right in front of your faces.