Rightists DO point this out. Loudly and often. 'Dog born in a stable is nor a horse' is an extremely common refrain. The problem is that Rightists also say crazy shit that gets amplified by a media ecosystem intent on portraying right wingers as stupid loonies lacking intellectual rigor.
Leftists are adept at playing games with numerator and denominator to stuff up statistics as they see fit. Count every criminal instance committed as endemic to the nation, count every good action as particular to the community. In the Manchester Arena bombing the media kept talking about how immigrants were specifically offering free rides to victims, while highlighting how Salman Abedi was the UKs responsibility since he was born in the magic UK dirt.
The counterprotestors were waving Palestine flags and stomping on random white people. Protecting yourself is one thing, claiming allegiance to a community not on your own territory (either Pakistan or UK) just shows how the divide cleaves.
It became super obvious whenever the medium terran capships (called corvettes for some insane reason defying ship classifications) did broadside engagements with each other during the first few NTF missions. The blocky GTCv corvettes all shot their green beams all over the place, barely glancing each other at times when head on. Only broadsides saw massive damage because the slashing beam sometimes travelled the length of the ship, whereas for headon engagements the TerSlash just grazed the bow of any ship. Super frustrating when seeing Shivans against Terran ships, since the Shivans usually had at least 2 fixed forward beams that pumped damage consistently.
I distinctly remember the TerSlash being a cause for me dying randomly during a few times when I tried to fly the useless Hercules II and snipe subsystems. Made no sense that I'd be nuked for no reason since I was away from the target, but I still got clipped.
Should be easy to code new variables, but the visual engine for the beam weapons remains the highlight. Maybe adjusting the anti fighter beams would yield good results; using the damage effect of a BGreen to show an oversized explosion even though the particle beam is a thin lance of pain.
God, Freespace is so damn good. I highly encourage mottezens to see this awesome clip.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=n47eKbMebMo&pp=ygUOZnJlZXNwYWNlIG9wZW4%3D
For something based off 20 year old (if not more) tech, it retains excellent particle effects and highlights. And the capship scales... so good. Fighting around a Hecate class in a nebula remains a standout experience. Irritating, but standout.
Freespace 2. Absolute best space sim ever. Freespace Open and Blue Planet circa 2010 were the best space mods ever and I honestly till now think it has the best capital ship effect gameplay.
I unfortunately cannot contribute any meaningful art, coding or other actual useful development asset to the project. However, I will highlight one key aspect of Freespace capital ship matchups that proved to be frustrating to early modders in capital ship balancing: TerSlash.
Capital ship beam weapons are the highlight of all Freespace capship engagements. The giant beams of destructive awesomeness that melted a fighter if it so much as glanced the hitbox of the massive instakill beam. The sight of hp% values dropping with a single volley... or nothing happening if you were using terran.
For whatever reason TerSlash and VSlash coded beam weapons have massive variable damage due to the miss variable never being calculated correctly, and that highly affects theoretical balance of any capital ship. The greens always were better performance, but I do think the devs thought the slash effect looked better in cap ship engagements.
I will take a look at the stack and see if anything jumps out, but it looks super fun! Looking forward to throwing AI fleets at each other for space destruction!
Participation in a conspiracy of silence means consenting, if not encouraging, this state of affairs.
Failure to hold peers to task when they advance false utopias is wrong when it is white supremacist, why is it wrong to state that importing millions of Indians to be Tim Hortons staffers or Guatamalans to pick fruits illegally has a net negative effect, much less bringing in islamist mirpuris or MS13 salvadorans.
Your peers being stupid is no need to make yourself stupid as well. Plenty of white people express relief when someone else speaks up to decry the obvious. Be the bigger man and speak what others dare only dream.
Modern western secular humanism is meant to be an anodyne soup appealing to everyone, further diminishing the power of traditional religious and socioeconomic gentry. That the recent immigrants fins secular humanism unappealing and continue finding succour in retrograde political beliefs is inconvenient and ignored by pro migrant class aspirants.
In aggregate, cheaper consumer goods and cheaper services results in net utility increases. That said utility increase is uneven is ignored and the common response from urban professionals is to sneer at the stupid proles who dare display unhappiness with their imported replacements.
Urban professionals have made it clear that importing migrants for their personal comfort matters. So what if tens of thousands of girls are raped or dozens of girls blown up by muslims, or stabbed by imports that never contribute economically. These stupid proles should know their place beneath the benevolent auspices of the professionals, and anyone who objects is a wrongthinker whose throat should be, as white-sounding Ricky Jones said, slit in the name of antifascism.
To the cheers of Free Free Palestine, for good measure. The presence of that damnable slogan with all manner of terrible activities conducted by the protected classes is something to consider too.
Youths means all young men of every skin color so that you think of white chavs whenever the media reports on the poor behavior of them. When the whites do bad things the media will aggressively call them right wing whites, so as to protect the precious brown migrants from every bad thing. I am 100% certain the plastering of Ricky Jones name everywhere is because that name sounds ostensibly white so the media gets to continue pretending their precious browns are not actually doing anything wrong.
The pro-outgroup white elites consider their own kin the enemy, and no small amount consider themselves part of the enemy. Their own cultural suicide is advertised as a net benefit for society.
Part of this is because only whites have a culture of self-criticism, usually because the objective is to tear down the proximate enemy. The reason for this meta being exploited seems to have gotten muddled of late, and now whites are the only ones who actively self-flagellate as a signal. The problem is that, since blacks and muslims and other cultures NEVER admit having done any fault for anything they have ever done, white people are the only ones who have a written record of saying 'we did bad things'. If I got an AI to teach 'who did bad things in the past' only white people will have written evidence of having done bad.
In this sociopolitical meta, only the highest skill players know that the self flagellation is only performative. I do not trust that new entrants into the cultural messaging will realize the game, and white men will cleave into blackpills or cucks exclusively.
The muslims enjoy a remarkable protected status for now because they are losers who continue exploiting the meta. Nigerians and Hindus in the Uk are starting to wise up to the meta too. The coming brown vs brown conflicts will melt the minds of progressives.
The elite fight among themselves. The losers there take over when someone else has finished storming the palace. In this current moment we see this happening with Bangladesh, and failing to happen with Venezuela. You must always have a new elite ready in the wings after a revolution.
For the native britons who hate their pussified PMC Oxford elite, they should look to an unassailable conservative ally. Someone the PMC will have difficulty attacking on racial grounds and whose antithetical values will be protected by their foreign ways.
Basically, bring forth the Suella Braverman or Kemi Badenoch leadership.
The EHC thinks that they can replace the uncooperative local peasants with pliant foreign serfs. I think the democrats especially are realizing that the foreign serfs turn out to have more in common with the local peasants, and that the appeal of living under the auspices of the EHC is not the opportunity to shine the shoes of the EHC but the opportunity to live like the local peasants. The democratic EHC is still overestimating its appeal and thinks commandments from on high are diktats the local peasants will suck up, enforced by new serfs imported at EHC request.
I maintain that the new EHC of feminized wokescolds maintained a surprisingly long period of visibility because it was filled with attractive college women and men who wanted to fuck them. As these women aged and the new college women abandon femininity and attractiveness, the actual mass of simps hoping to score has diminished, and this will result in a consequent reduction in democratic EHC power for reasons that will be unfathomable to the EHC.
One thing to note is that the british officer class did/does have a sense of noblesse obligee, with higher casualty rates in officers than in men for WW1 and WW2, and even now I hear less grousing from tommies about their officers than other countries (to be fair I haven't spoken to infantry for a decade, so I might be missing something there). Again, the homogenous culture of US and UK militarIES has a flattening effect, and the british especially seemed to reserve racialized denigration of their soldiers to dismissal of foreign levies especially the sepoys/rajputs (though Gurkhas and sikhs enjoy consistent appreciation among British commanders). Modern western societies are fractured enough for this to largely no longer hold, and frankly we saw the first iteration of this crack during Vietnam where an unfit officer class rushed through low quality command school earned the ire of black and white grunts alike.
Unfortunately China has failed to stop a new elite technocratic class from fermenting in the trash heap. A new crop of economic elites has supplanted the old legacy that indeed fled to San Francisco, Sydney and Vancouver via Hong Kong, and this new crop is dabbing their toes in both the China and Western economic elite. The new moneyed Chinese are not climbing the ranks of coroporate america, but indtead forming medium sized enterprises cornering all manner of small import export goods no one thinks about. Your costco crab chunks may come from Alaskan fishermen, but they are processed by some Chinese-owned slave factories in Thailand.
The difference here is that the proles think the elites hate the country the proles are fighting for, much less the proles themselves. Proles fight for a country that their kin can succeed in, even if some haliburton exec profits more. Proles will not fight for a country that actively sneers and spits on them. White americans still have suburbs wherein the dream of an america that fights for them lives large, the modern scouser thinks Labour will sell his daughters for ISIS votes.
Shit, really? I keep seeing paeans to Donald Harris plastered across Reddit, especially that black and white photo of him carrying Kamala as a baby. Guess I fell victim to the narrative shaping.
In which case then Kamala has the same case to black identity as Obama. Mother raising a child in the mothers culture with no input from the sperm donor. Any 'blackness' these miscegenated monocultures pretend at is a construction formed in university for social purposes.
Obama at least sported a fro and played basketball. Does Harris make a single pretense at black presentation?
Harris has a greater claim to being black than Obama, since Obama grew up with his white mom and grandparents. That Harris is not acculturated to Black struggles because her Jamaican father was an academic who mixed with polite company instead of living the black experience is only mildly inconvenient for Harris.
Harris does not LOOK black. Her hair is flowing, she is so pale she doesn't even count as high yellow, and she talks like AOC instead of Cori Bush. Harris has little claim to the black experience even in California, and to her credit she is not running on her blackness the same way Obama did (maybe because Obama is a deft operator whose political presentation is unmatched since Bill Clinton).
Besides and lets be real here, is running on blackness a win condition? Harris is aware that the balancing game of democratic turnout and normie turnoff does not favor evoking MLK tier struggles, much less the poisoned Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan style polemics that Blacks actually paid attention to. Ibrahm Kendi has thankfully been relegated to the dirt where he belongs, so the dems at least do not need to listen to him as much as they had to during 2018-2021.
Some professions and peoples are simply seen as net accretive to a society, and people trust their gut instincts on who is a decent fit. Doctors are always welcome, fruit pickers and garbagemen flip on either side, landlord 'investors' are parasites, foreign preachers are threats.
More than anything else though, humility is expected. No one expects effusive genuflection and simpering from foreigners, but sneering entitled assholes are unpopular regardless of origin. Irish travelers are probably more unpopular than jihadis, but that doesn't mean some sneering IIM money mover disparaging the locals will be ignored when the purge comes. Doctor Human will have people of note standing up for him, the parasite coterie will be thrown to the grinder regardless of origin.
Hindus ruling over muslims with an iron fist is also cope given the history of hindus being subjugated by foreign sultanates repeatedly thanks to the fractured nature of India. Try asking a gujurati to support a sindhi against a bihari and somehow it will be a tamil that benefits.
Unless he was saying that hindus rule over lowe classes with an iron fist. He is correct there, but whatever merits there are in that logic are not explicatable in polite society.
Replacing local proles with foreign ubermench works so long as the ubermench are superior enough to supplant the proles but inferior enough to remain subservient to the whims of those who imported the ubermench.
The filter thus becomes the selection entity, and the selection entities are self-motivated to advance their own specific interests and not those of 'greater society' or whatever truism we wish to pretend exists. Family reunification just wants to flood the land with their kin, employers want cheap labour, refugee advocates want to prove the success of their project. The only people at the levers who exercise any discretion in filtering migrants are the civil servants, and they are optimized to do the job and fuck off with minimal trouble, so the only pressure they face is whichever idiot is screaming at them to let in every single mirpuri in the valley. Is it any wonder then that migration is so endlessly broken?
I think I should just copy paste my favorite talking points because they keep getting validated: urban elites side with foreign migrants against rural poor because political capture is the win condition for urban elites, taking from the till as they pretend to dispense the spoils.
Foreign migrants are not self selected for automatic contribution, at least in the west. The exploitable loopholes of family reunions and illegal crossings allow for an endless volume of low human capital migrants, especially mirpuris and roma for the UK, to enter unchecked and unmonitored.
The big difference is that the urban elites are happy to loudly decry white trash as the true threat, but will not say a single word about crime by foreigners. Pretending it doesn't happen makes it worse, claiming that the foreigners are actually British and therefore the crimes represent British values just makes the difference in framing more obvious.
Countries can do without a surplus of chip shops, phone sellers and cab drivers. Muslims aren't council workers or fruit pickers, and more focus will hone in on the migrant breakdown to make sure migrants are indeed 'selected' for optimality.
Theres an inverse monty hall problem here somehow and I want a smart person to provide the calculus of why switching after the donkey is revealed works here but not in the game.
Honestly I think the motivation is that leftists have a bunch of internalised self-consciousness about weirdness.
Ding ding ding. Walz probably said it in a folksy calling-it-as-I-see-it manner, but the democrat embrace of it is telling. To use weird deflects that appellation, rubber glue style. Its not just the transgressive quality of progressive beliefs that is weird unto itself because it subverts or attacks existing norms, its that by making the right the weird ones it allows the left views to be laundered into normality.
Most nonsense like this is ultimately ingroup signalling, with the outrage from the right about the label weird being the fact that democrats are transparently trying to pass off THEIR craziness as normal. It just becomes more proof of institutional capture by an out of touch progressive elite that is not able to consider that proles can have their own opinions.
The fact that riots can be easily contained is proof by negative: rioting farmers and strikers are easily corralled and contained, so why are pro-palestine and blm protests allowed to run unchecked.
There will ultimately be a very severe reckoning about visible disparities in police actions within western countries: Jan 6th and Charlottesville rioters are ground to the dirt, but BLM and Hamas protests goes unimpeded. The left wing media ecosystem can pretend it didn't happen and keep its adherents in the Guardian-MSNBC-Vox-Slate-Newrepublic bubble of liberal comfort, but the images get circulated out regardless. This disparity will be taken as proof of institutional capture by traitors who embolden disruptive actors, and riots will give way to rebellion in due time.
The contingent isn't large, except for where it matters: in the civil service and universities. Look at Young Labour to see the threat that Starmer is facing: the man is basically a reformed socialist and he managed to annihilate Momentum and Corbyn to FINALLY kick out years of dysfunctional Tory government, and Starmer STILL has to keep in mind a militant left that wants to open the borders entirely and drown out the UK in a sea of loyal muslim socialists.
Leftists use the oppressor oppressed axis to force their chosen enemy as the source of all ill regardless of provenance. The Hutus murdered Tutsis because of Belgian colonialism, the Turks genocided Armenians because of the Crusades, the Indonesians killed East Timor at US direction. There is no sincere belief in the oppressor oppressed axis, merely an exploitable meta founded in conspiracism and justified by postmodern dialectics.
More options
Context Copy link