pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
No bio...
User ID: 278
Ultimately we are both going to have to fill in the blanks as to what the "proper" interpretation of the rubric is. I suppose it comes down to who you trust to interpret the rubric properly - the instructor or Fulnecky. In this case, I have to give a little deference to the professor, because she created the rubric and I've experienced similar grading standards in the past. I suppose this sort of thing is what the University is interested in finding out.
I agree with all of this. My problem is I just don't have any confidence that these kinds of standards are applied in a consistent manner, and I don't have any particular reason to trust this particular instructor any more than I trust the rest of University administration, which is not at all. I will never, ever, forget how much this story about a University essay crushed me: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/teen-accepted-stanford-after-writing-blacklivesmatter-100-times-application-n742586
You could get a LTO-9 robotic tape library capable of storing a lot more data than that for a few million.
I don't doubt it will be a tough cycle for Republicans, but off-cycle elections are not very reliable indicators, because gaps caused by differing voter propensity are greatly magnified compared to normal on-cycle elections.
It's one of the few things they can do that can't be undone by a judge.
In part, as a corrective to the perceived over-sensitivity of the prior military bureaucracy.
How so? People are justifiably killed in the process of routine law enforcement all the time.
Perhaps not, but you are the one bringing up the context of a criminal trial, which does not otherwise seem relevant.
I think Nyb is talking about cases where it could be clearly demonstrated that the President was not involved in the approval process. Later saying he would have approved it anyways wouldn't cure that.
I think there are two related reasons: one, motivation dies quickly after becoming mired in bureaucracy. Someone who is highly motivated to provide a mentoring opportunity for a group of boys might not be able to find the drive to complete more than a single form, let alone typing up paragraphs of baloney. Same thing hampering science IMO.
Second is legitimate fear of liability. Even if you jump through all the paperwork hoops, even a minor accident can easily result in years of expensive legal wrangling, even if you ultimately win. Insurance against this is expensive and yet scourge bureaucratic hurdle to doing anything.
As usual, if you want to make the world a better place, first kill all the lawyers.
A better analogy then would be that the SVP of your division says your boss is still employed, but a SVP of a different division which contains HR says he's not
I just finished the CP2077 main storyline yesterday, but I had left a lot of the side jobs undone. I'll definitely be going back to do some of those, but after a while I really miss the humor and sarcasm of, say, GTAV, which makes just wandering around the world fun.
Treason is defined in the literal constitution in a way which doesn’t seem to apply here (who are the enemies of the United States being given aid and comfort to?).
Treason and sedition are two different things. However, U.S. code does not authorize death as a punishment for sedition.
I finally read The Road by Cormac Mcarthy. Great book, and hard to put down, with no chapters or any other breaks at all. I don't know why I mentally associated Cormac Mcarthy with abstruse James-Joyce-style "literary" fiction, but while the book has a large vocabulary and was semi-poetic at times it was not hard to follow. Might check out some of his others.
They can and have been doing that over the last decade. It's just a nontrivial amount of work and not a high priority.
There's very little developer energy for desktop applications for any desktop platform. Mobile apps and their promise of easy monetization has sucked up most commercial interest, and cloud-backed client apps get most of the rest. Even open source dev energy seems most interested in services, not desktop apps.
Even if you were prevented from selling it for several years, at which point it may or may not be worth anything? Most people need actual money to live on in real time.
True, and they were blamed accordingly
propose a budget that sucks
It was literally the exact same budget that the government has been operating under. The Democrats were in no way opposing changes they disfavor, they were rejecting the status quo.
ETA: A status quo they previously voted for, mind
Yes, the OP is missing that this is not about trust/don't trust, it's about relative trust. Red tribes may not trust the government much, but they trust the media even less than that.
Only in a minor way. I work in IT so I am more likely to work on compliance issues, but that's about it.
I also have a jd and do not practice
Without numbers, I'm not convinced there actually are larger problems. All I know is that the overwhelming majority of the federal budget goes to welfare of one sort or another, and not corporate bailouts or foreign adventures. Even if the undeserving only amounted to 10%, that's 10% of a staggeringly large sum.
The main difference is that DC is a federal district, so it has no independent sovereignty and the federal government can do whatever it wants. Other cities have overlapping state jurisdiction which the Constitution gives some weight to, so the permitted activities of federal forces is much more circumscribed. If the locals are cooperative of course there is a lot more leeway, but if they are not, then there would have to be some federal nexus in their activities.
Is this true though? Is not the real reason why war crimes are forbidden and disavowed by us that we do not wish them to be inflicted on us? You could call this an application of the golden rule of ethics, but it looks more to me like an iterated prisoner's dilemma. If a "war crime" is committed and nobody knows about it, is anyone actually going to care? Who writes the history books, after all?
Was ethics the reason why we have (so far) avoided nuclear annihilation, or was it actually a more bloody-minded calculus that the only winning move was not to play?
- Prev
- Next

You don't have to actively care about something for it to have profoundly affected your life. In fact, I would guess that often the most disruptive things are the ones that people move on from, because that's how you get past it and move on with your life. But it will still have affected you!
More options
Context Copy link