hydroacetylene
No bio...
User ID: 128
They won by way less than anyone expected because woke was unpopular.
Fuentes has more influence among GOP staffers than actual voters, who have mostly never heard of the guy.
If they're crew cab, then they are literally the exact same thing as a consumer pickup that you use to commute between your suburban home and the office- just with fewer bells and whistles. Commercial customers are more likely to order trucks as part of a planned replacement cycle rather than show up to the lot to buy day of, so the economics of keeping them in stock are different.
The things that make work pickup trucks radically different are usually aftermarket modifications to base model vehicles which have identical commercial and personal builds from the manufacturer. Commercial full sized work vans, on the other hand, are built differently, but very few people are shopping for a full sized van for personal use.
IIRC the book of Mormon does not contain anything from the actual bible.
I'm not old enough to remember the church before VII. But my grandmother referred to mantillas as 'doilies' because she just literally didn't know the term; when she was a teen and young adult she had to wear a hat or a scarf, of course, but she called them those things, and not a 'veil'.
Perhaps orthogonal to your point, but People of Praise is not a traditionalist Catholic group, and gets along very poorly with trads. There are traditionalist Catholics appointed to the judiciary(the most prominent of whom is Clarence Thomas) by republicans aplenty; the thing they have in common is that that they are all men.
People of Praise is a charismatic Catholic group theoretically open to non-Catholic Christians. This is the... well technically louder, but you know what I mean- strain of conservative Catholicism.
There's truth to this, but the base model pickup trucks aren't really any more expensive when adjusted for inflation- the ones sold today are mostly luxury vehicles.
You can buy a new pickup truck from an American dealership for under $40k, they're more expensive than sedans but not by that much. The base models just don't sell very well(there are luxury vehicle versions of all the main pickup truck models and they sell like hotcakes). Rising expectations are most of the affordability crisis.
Obviously, politicians can't say that out loud. But it is true. Groceries are higher, but not by as much as American's expectations of what they should be eating. My parents grew up eating pasta, hotdogs, and other cheap dishes multiple nights a week. My grandparents got most of their calories from rice growing up(no, this was not during the depression). Now Americans think eating chicken thighs is poverty. Base model(no bells and whistles) vehicles sell so poorly that dealers don't even bother to stock them(although they will special order- manufacturers make them). House sizes are gigantic even compared to the relatively recent past and most of the extra space is essentially wasted.
putting mainstream Republicans in gulags is an issue that polls extremely well with mainstream Democrats.
You mind providing the evidence for this?
As far as I know, the closest evidence for it is that during Covid-19, democrats broadly supported draconian unconstitutional measures that would have hurt their political enemies very strongly.
I expect Jeffries to mostly try to impeach Trump. Legitimately don't know if he'll get removed from office- the senate is smart enough to understand their partisan incentives are the opposite of what you'd expect, but also political enough that they can't just straightforwardly follow game theory.
In Texas, Democrats will legalize pot in some form. They will also cut off funding for schoolchoice. I expect them to try, and fail, to bring teacher's unions to Texas, and lose control of the house in '28(in the bluest year since the seventies they have a narrower margin of control than republicans usually get). Ted Cruz will likely endorse the sort of normiecons who do well in the suburbs for statewide elections in 2030, and this will help republicans.
Like, you can't keep saying, "but I do have precedence" over and over again, while doing something 20% worse each and every time.
Clinton-Bush-Obama-Trump
Yeah, I think you can.
Things are not 'bad enough economically'. There are legitimate complaints about the economy, yes, but this isn't even 2008. We saw a gigantic blue wave for other reasons- voters rated 'corruption' as the only issue that was more important to them than 'affordability', and in practice that's probably mostly Epstein and other low-IQ conspiracy theories. I think ICE and the GOP being way-too-online also backfired electorally.
Remember, in '08 the economy was way worse but republicans didn't lose nearly as hard.
While voters clearly don't like trans, it's clearly not a high-salience issue for voters most of the time. I think voters brutally punish being way-too-online, at least in normal years, but when trans issues aren't suddenly relevant due to recent events they are in themselves typically ignored by voters.
Facebook owns instagram, which is where the normie teens are, at much higher rates than tiktok.
Do indigenous activist even want to expel white people from North America and return to governance under various native policies, like in the sense of they rub a lamp and have any three wishes, would they use them for that? It seems to me they just want free shit.
Anne Romney probably did veil in the context the mormon tradition requires. ACB may or may not; you'd have to send someone to watch her at church. No one cares because they wear normal western clothing. The plain folk veil with bonnets, the actual trad western headcovering(mantillas which are now popular among younger Catholics would have been completely unknown in the Anglosphere when veiling was actually required).
Hinojosa ran on, explicitly, California-fying Texas. Her two big policy proposals are bringing in teacher's unions and increasing permitting requirements.
A minor correction- data centers are 80/20 but republicans are much closer to evenly split.
Yeah, but the senate skews towards 'good at political game theory'.
There were seven republicans who voted to convict Trump over J6. Obviously not all of them are still there, but getting another one or two- especially ones who aren't up for reelection in '28- shouldn't be impossible after that performance.
The real reason republicans should let Trump get impeached is that it will make the bleeding in '28 slightly less bad. Vance is merely very unpopular and not pure poison to everyone.
Abbott's special sessions were called to accomplish ultra-partisan very controversial legislation and that's why there were so many of them- Texas law doesn't allow any old nonsense to be considered in a special session, only the issue they're called for.
Yes, Texas legislators make phone calls to get constituents assistance with permitting etc all the time. But most Texans will have at least one republican representing them- either in the senate or the house.
Texas legislators all have off season jobs and constituent services could be senators or reps- most businesses will have split representation.
- Prev
- Next

It's called the Khazar hypothesis and it's fairly common albeit fringe.
More options
Context Copy link