@hydroacetylene's banner p

hydroacetylene


				

				

				
8 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2022 September 04 20:00:27 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 128

hydroacetylene


				
				
				

				
8 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2022 September 04 20:00:27 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 128

Verified Email

The difference, as you touch on, is that there is no majority which thinks GOP voters are all perverts who deserve whatever consequences. Sure, there's people that believe that. But a substantial percentage of people would react to 'transwomen using the mens locker room is a safety issue' with some variant of 'they deserve it for being perverts'. You kinda can't afford to not police your own.

First, it seems weird that people go so hard on clavicular when stuff like this is accepted (at least by the online left).

This is because the normies know about clavicular. Up until your post, I had been blissfully ignorant of this guy. I think they're both stupid, for the record.

Which American citizens? The serve the interests of current senior citizens very well.

People do not think congress runs the country. They think the president does, and the congress are do nothings that occasionally shut the government down for some opaque reason, it doesn't seem to affect very much.

It's because almost all of them are damned ugly, and putting effort into looking ugly is ridiculous.

We all have some sympathy for people who can't be bothered to groom or control their weight. Not a lot, but some. But lesbian haircuts, weird face piercings, ugly assymetric tattoos? Genuinely why?

I think that a gender identity (as used by pro-trans people) is not something falsifiable

Oh contraire- to the extent that it exists, it's pretty easy to falsify- they do it every time they use the toilet. It's like insisting that they're six meters tall, no they're not, every time they go through the door they disprove their assertion.

Croatia specifically has lots of neonazis, so probably. Still doesn't mean Platner necessarily knew it as anything other than a generic skull and crossbones.

But plenty of people define freedom as their community getting to boss people around without the imperial overlord getting up in its business. The median human being who has ever lived was a peasant farmer living under the tyranny of the village, itself subject to a brutal but remote empire. There's a deep instinct to favor local elders' petty tyranny and resent central leadership.

I think the more defensible position is that charismatic, dominant men who are very committed to progressive values- which includes sex positivity- are mostly rapists, and that older mores are protective against committing rape. An exaggerated version of the male feminist effect.

Democrats do not need to project charismatic competency. That shit seems fake. Look at Trump- he changed national politics by seeming like your drunk uncle at thanksgiving(after he won the powerball), because that's what Trump is. Bill Clinton seemed like your mildly sleazy brother in law you who always had a beer for when the women were getting too overbearing. These guys are recognizable as real- but not especially competent. Our politics don't reward that. If we cared about competence there'd be a bunch of accountants and engineers getting elected, instead of lawyers and car dealership owners.

Moore at the very least was strongly pressured, he was just crazy and oblivious.

Lol. The satire is how you know it's working.

Humour is a coping mechanism. The medievals had an entire holiday dedicated to making fun of the church(it's evolved into mardi gras). Even the schizoid Candace Owens acid trips about Egypt and a french hit squad wouldn't be happening if there wasn't a recognition of the cultus of Charlie Kirk. His faction won and that's why people make fun of it. The Byzantine emperors developed a tradition of accepting mockery of themselves to show they were too important to be bothered. That's what we're seeing.

I don't know why we'd assume that.

The 'pure' dark forest hypothesis argues for fringe-science superweapons to sterilize large areas of space. But if it is true, then the far more physically plausible method would be long range relativistic bombardment of known inhabited planets- and earth is much more likely to be targeted at extreme range than mars.

I'm totally willing to believe a tattoo artist downloads 'skull and bones' from a google image search to use as a stencil pattern.

It doesn’t seem to be the jewposters defending this. Or the misogynists. I can’t actually find the pattern.

What do you live for man, if not for someone else? I mean there's always drugs, but you don't seem the sort.

The bigger issue is probably that chips are designed to work immersed in air, which conducts heat away. In orbit, you'd have to either build a pressurized system or redesign the chips to have a different kind of active cooling. It's getting the heat to the radiator that would be the problem.

But, see, we've been to space, and had to cool shit down up there. It would seem like NASA has the table to know exactly how much radiator surface is needed for every heat load and the heatload is theoretically calculable based on existing chip design. I suspect that the datacenter inside the satellite would need to be redesigned down to a very small level due to the lack of a cooling medium, but 'how much radiator do we need to get rid of heat' doesn't seem like something we'd debate without really knowing the answer- it's not exactly the drake equation of building datacenters in space.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the radiator for a spaceship itself is basically just a big piece of metal, right? It's what the condensing stage of the cooling unit dumps heat into to reject it? As an HVAC tech I'll say it should work fine if it has a hole in it, just like plenty of condensers on earth work fine with hail damage on the fins or dirt on them. Not ideal, but fine.

presidential offices

OK Bill Clinton.

I tend to agree that building compute in places where the most efficient electricity option is hamsters in wheels is probably an easier engineering challenge than cooling datacenters in space.

It's entirely possible they can release some conversations with a young lady considerably younger than seventeen.

I would be shocked if Platner hadn't been a habitual drunk driver for long stretches of time, given everything else we know about his character.

He didn't bring in conservatives, his appeal was that he would juice turnout among the grassroots working class left who are now politically homeless due to the DNC's increasing moderation.

Obviously, it's not based on an accurate worldview.

What’s wrong with having 7+ kids?

No? Fascism is a specific thing. Obligations to the community is much much broader.