hydroacetylene
No bio...
User ID: 128
Politics is totally entertainment. That’s why we have President Trump.
I’m sure there has, at some point, been a Jewish serial killer who drank the blood of Christian children. If you further clarified that you were referring to that guy, I think at least half of Jewish men would find the reaction of other Jews hilarious.
Islamists we’re on the US side of the Cold War
Mormons do not believe the same things as Joseph Smith.
What do you think politics is, it not performance art?
The Amish and the Hasidim have(often badly dysfunctional; these are not paradaisical cultures) worldviews alternative to modernity. The Mormons are fundamentally modern people. That's the difference.
And Islam comes with a complete premodern worldview and value system, complete with legal code straight out of the eighth century.
I don't often agree with secure signals. But the entertainment industry is one of the few places where 'it's the jews' is a reasonable first order hypothesis much of the time.
But what do you think they think of woke communist parents indoctrinating their children to be woke communists?
I suspect that ‘exegetical’ was not these people’s reason.
Lots of western Mohammedans eat regular bacon, and don’t check what the content of their sausage is, and eat whatever a bbq joint specializes in… while still refusing a pork chop. I’ve even met some who will drink vodka like a fish and then refuse beer or wine because Islam.
Right, homosexuality was a lot less stigmatized when everyone agreed it was a distasteful personal Vice.
The religious conservative view is not that parents have a right to propagate their worldview. It is that we are right and you are wrong, and children are highly impressionable and need paternalist guidance.
Don’t Islamic countries actually have very high rates, comparatively, of online Vice- gaming, porn, gambling, etc?
It seems to me that the reasonable middle ground is that you can’t ban artists for outside of stadium, unrelated speech or conduct. Michael Jackson? Don’t host sleepovers in the stadium. ‘Macklemore’? Don’t talk about Israeli aggression during concerts. Etc, etc. These venues are after all privately owned, even if it’s not a truly free market.
Clearly, ‘Macklemore’ needs to cross the Mike Tyson threshold, where any story about him is believable, regardless of how crazy, and no one would give a shit. Seriously, the mild mannered anti Zionist not antisemite in an industry controlled by the Jews… what did he think would happen?
I have some bad news for you- the ven diagram of ‘might try to kill Trump’ and not a complete screwup is basically weird rationalist cults and foreign powers.
Older women do not have a partisan fertility gap.
It’s not rally around the woman, it’s rally around the mom. These women deeply believe that all mothers, everywhere, are incorruptible paragons of selflessness being taken advantage of by men into not sticking up for themselves.
Most societies have had this idea; in our society it’s vulgar feminism, but in plenty of societies it’s reverence for motherhood.
‘America B’
That is a lot of confidence in democrats winning 2028, from a group which is given to believing all sorts of fantastic Qanon level BS about republicans ending free and fair elections.
This stuff is at some point dependent on physical hardware, no? We can just blow up the data centers if they get out of hand.
Yes, you’re confusing America and England. Anglicanism is a liberal elite religion here- establishment but very much not appropriate for the right wing of the Republican Party. Catholicism covers the whole class spectrum in America and the (relatively small) liberal wing is still more moderate than the episcopal church.
Building datacenters is conservative coded in America, even if it's not super popular among either party. Conservatives are also racking up wins on gun rights.
Lol, the winners are strivers at semirural schools. The innercity kids and valley tejanos fail out their first year and get replaced with Catholic school alums that transfer from commuter schools with a specific program for this.
Technically speaking, as I point out over and over and over again, North Vietnam accepted defeat. The US withdrew, then North Vietnam invaded again, and South Vietnam actually won the first time- then they sacked their best general out of paranoia and North Vietnam winning the second time shocked everyone, including the North Vietnamese. The US believed that it had accomplished its war goals of building a functioning South Vietnamese state which could defend itself and preventing North Vietnam from total war.
- Prev
- Next

You can just live that lifestyle at the cost of personal friction
More options
Context Copy link