Talk of the town? I'm pretty sure LoTT was bigger news a few months ago, but I'm not aware of anything she's down recently to qualify as "talk of the town". People moved on from what I can tell.
Hospitals and doctors around the country are facing harassment and even death threats over the medical care they offer to transgender kids. In many cases, they have been the subject of posts by a Twitter account called Libs of TikTok, as well as stories in conservative media outlets casting gender-affirming care as child abuse and mutilation.
Which raises the question: where should social networks draw the line with accounts promoting narratives that spark harassment campaigns on their platforms and beyond?
They're doing elective pediatric double mastectomies on minors, and that's not a problem. The problem here is that Libs of Tiktok is shining a light on it and letting the world know. Fucked up, eh?
Your own source says that LoTT was inaccurately claiming they performed surgeries on young kids.
"The information in the recording is not accurate. We do not and have never performed gender-affirming hysterectomies for anyone under the age of 18," Children's National said in a statement to NPR. "The operator speaking provided wrong information."
Also, they're apparently receiving harassment.
Childrens' hospitals in Boston, Seattle, Chicago, and Portland, Oregon, have also been targeted. Last week, Boston Children's Hospital warned it was receiving "a large volume of hostile internet activity, phone calls, and harassing emails including threats of violence toward our clinicians and staff" after false claims it performs genital surgeries on minors.
I'd say harassing people is a problem regardless of what you think about transgenderism and gender-affirming surgeries.
What you're talking about is just a heuristic in the absence of evidence. A liar can tell the truth, and we cannot claim they are wrong simply by pointing to their background.
Is there any actual proof that NPR or the people who are quoted are incorrect?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What are you talking about? Is there some case where someone accused her of ST?
Yes? It's the talk of the town? That's why that Washington Post "journalist" tracked her down, doxxed her, and harassed her family members.
https://stardomfacts.com/libs-of-tiktok-creator-chaya-raichik-who-is-she-her-photo-address-and-husband/
Talk of the town? I'm pretty sure LoTT was bigger news a few months ago, but I'm not aware of anything she's down recently to qualify as "talk of the town". People moved on from what I can tell.
Just because you choose to ignore something does not mean everyone does.
And just because you choose to pay attention doesn't mean everyone does. That logic cuts both ways.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
They're doing elective pediatric double mastectomies on minors, and that's not a problem. The problem here is that Libs of Tiktok is shining a light on it and letting the world know. Fucked up, eh?
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/26/1119634878/childrens-hospitals-are-the-latest-target-of-anti-lgbtq-harassment
Your own source says that LoTT was inaccurately claiming they performed surgeries on young kids.
Also, they're apparently receiving harassment.
I'd say harassing people is a problem regardless of what you think about transgenderism and gender-affirming surgeries.
I think they're using that old rhetorical device to avoid responsibility: lying.
Moreover NPR is hardly a neutral source. http://imgur.com/myGuSjy
I'm not some kid. I grew up on NPR. I'm disgusted to see what they've become. I feel like I lost a friend.
Is there any proof, or does it just come down to whether one trusts the source or not?
Does one trust a known deceiver? Especially when they have something to gain by their actions?
What you're talking about is just a heuristic in the absence of evidence. A liar can tell the truth, and we cannot claim they are wrong simply by pointing to their background.
Is there any actual proof that NPR or the people who are quoted are incorrect?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link