This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
They are. Biological constructs are socially defined by groups of scientists and doctors. Everything we can talk about is a social construct. Then we can talk about how social constructs are products of brains which we socially-defined to be biological entities... My point is that if the average overeducated Westerner has trouble grasping the most apparent sexual dysmorphism, then how much more difficult will it be for them to understand the nuances of the boundaries between Jew and goy, when they are a lot more subtle?
To be fair, sexual dysmorphism is mostly important in medical settings these days, for example it would be paradoxical during a shipwreck to have a captain, supposed to go down with the ship, prioritize the evacuation of women and children, while being a woman themselves.
Have you quantified that or is that just a hunch? I'm sure there are perfectly upstanding Jewish people up there, just like there are perfectly upstanding people of any given race, and there are very smart Sub-Saharan Africans, and many African-Americans never commit any violent crime. Yet, there is still data showing that certain human groups are associated with certain traits, behavior, civilizational outcomes, etc.
Do I believe that there are personality traits that can be conserved across history in different proportions in different human groups? I do. Do I have evidence, biological correlates of an inheritability? No, I can't say I do. All I see are repeated patterns of behavior across time and space associated with certain outcomes.
Here are a few traits that I could see getting carried with higher than average likelihood in a 'Jewish subspecies' :
I'm not saying all of these hypothetical traits are absolutely necessary to define a member of a Jewish subspecies, but if we could quantify these traits at birth, I would imagine a PCA would cluster Jews away from Europeans based on at least some of these traits.
In adolescence I would definitely expect to see that, as many of these traits can be expected to be completely culturally transmitted or at least culturally reinforced (for example negotiation skills).
I would not say that most of these traits are necessarily malignant, some of these traits can lead to good outcomes in business, which explains that the underlying biological substrate were selected. Perhaps the problem is a matter of geometry. With the right technological substrate, a small software company can grow enormously given that once designed their product can be infinitely replicated at very little cost. Does that mean that their software is much more valuable than a manufacturing company with profit margins constrained by the physical availability of their inputs, etc?
Unfortunately, a population optimized for trading, rent-seeking, usury, etc will have a higher rate of power consolidation than a more diversified population which provides other essential agricultural, defense, manufacturing services..., ie labor. Therefore the first population can quickly hijack the power processes of the second population by ways of resource and influence control, and we end up with American taxpayers supporting Zelensky and Netanyahu's adventures. The problem is not that that population gains control, if they are good at having control, but that they have a different moral system, and different goals than the majority population. An alignment problem.
They would. If the US were blockading Mexico, US occupation forces expelled Mexican homeowners to house Americans, killed random Mexican citizens, and subjected them to a thousand other humiliations on a daily basis. See for ex.
Arguably, Israel is a far-right country engaged in ethnic cleansing on thousands of civilians, right now. Yet Jewish Americans can afford the double standard of both demanding more assistance to Israel (above and beyond what they have been getting for decades), and talking down on border-minded Americans who demand 1/100 of what Israel gets away with? We're talking about the most 'privileged' group of Americans, by any metric of wealth, education, political and media representation...
More options
Context Copy link