This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Of course not, why would they? Autists don't have a place in it because the progressive stack isn't real. Leftists care about some minorities more than others, but not because they have an a priori commitment to "the stack" or any particular stack. They appear to care about "the stack" because its an effective weapon, both against the outgroup, and against the in group as a purity check.
They don't care about autists in the stack for the same reason you don't see the women's march boycotting Exxon for not having enough women on its roughneck crews. They don't care about the stack, they care about power. Adding autists to the stack doesn't gain them any power, so they don't care.
Further, leftists are not naturally aligned with autists. Leftists care first and foremost about eliminating distinctions, which requires absolute conformity of behavior. If that means insisting that men are literally women, you had better say so. Obviously, Autists are disinclined to play along, assuming they are even able to recognize the game in the first place. As James Damore found out, no one actually wanted serious, scientifically-backed suggestions for improving female participation at Google, even though he was specifically asked to provide such suggestions. They wanted everyone to practice parroting back the party line as part of the humiliation ritual they built into the promotion structure.
Also, I support @somethingsomething on this. Being a part of the stack is not desirable.
Edit: James Lindsay actually just released a piece on the leftist conception of ablism. The academic term for this is Disability Studies. They already consider being abled to be an original sin. They just don't care about autists.
More options
Context Copy link