This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
European military chiefs realized that the press is happy to boost stories about being invaded by Russia because fear sells / gets views, and that this in turn can lead to political pressure to raise defense budgets. The German military wants the coalition to adhere to the huge boost to defense spending announced after the invasion of Ukraine (which the Germans now appear to be wavering on because of the tougher economic situation), and the British military, traditionally a Tory institution that got slashed during Labour governments, want to make sure that Starmer continues with the current plans to increase spending, buy more planes, keep both aircraft carriers in service and so on. All this is further bolstered by the fact that the US government and pentagon encourages these European defense officials to make these statements (and leaks some of them to the press itself).
Regarding Taiwan, both the US and China know that America isn’t going to war for Taiwan. It’s not viable, it’s not justifiable directly (the public will switch off at the word ‘semiconductor’) and the American heartland doesn’t want to kill Chinese the way they wanted to kill Arabs after 9/11. China is developing domestic semiconductor / EUV equivalent tech faster than anyone imagined, so there’s less immediate pressure to invade even if the US forces tougher export sanctions, they can proceed with the general plan to wait a few more decades if they have to until the political situation in Taiwan changes for any one of a large number of reasons.
More options
Context Copy link