This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Chinese censorship is odd. For instance, they're currently sort of favouring street dance, and there are several TV shows with big finals hosting competitions. But you can't show tattoos, so any foreign dancers who have tattoos, or any hosts with them as you can see with Jay Park here, have to cover them up with stickling plaster (and if those fall off during dance, the show then blurs out the naughty socially undesirable tattoos or earrings on men).
Personally, I don't like tattoos, but I think it shows the kind of difference in what is and is not permissible for TV viewership in a way that wouldn't happen in the West.
Every mall in my tier three city has a hip hop dance studio.
But yeah TV is much more heavily policed than books. It has far greater influence on the hoi polloi and that’s what the party is concerned about.
As I said, Chinese censorship - from the little I've learned about it - is odd. There's not really a strict "this is censorship worthy and this is not" list, as such, but on the other hand you do have government bodies monitoring TV, radio, pop culture and they can switch on and off as they feel necessary - see the pother over effeminacy - and that puts subtle but real pressure on the industry bodies that ostensibly are the ones in charge of running the stations etc.
Chinese fans of particular actors, singers, idols can also be - to use a technical term - batshit insane, they are very active online, and malicious actors have no problem getting stars into genuinely serious trouble, and that spreads even to those who worked with them in 'guilt by association', out of jealousy ("X is more popular than Y, whom I idolise, that is not right and I'm going to get X!") and other motives.
So I'm not at all surprised that Worldcon held in China might have background interference, not even directly from the Chinese government, but from those who think that certain subjects or writers or how the topics are written may be 'problematic' and they act in advance to 'maintain harmony and not insult national emotion', as it were.
As I said, I'm laughing over the allegations because this is what the whole Purge of the Puppies was about - getting rid of wrongthink and wrongthinkers. So the outrage over this is very ironic, and the defence seems to be "but what we did wasn't censorship because it was we who did it, and besides we did it all out in the open!"
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link