This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This Guardian article is ridiculous but seems to be the discretion leftists are taking basically calling out the motives of the people who brought attention to her fraud. The bottom line is that stuff is irrelevant and it doesn't matter if they are white supremacists or flat earthers. She's president of Harvard and a serial plagiarizer and completely unqualified for that job. The other funny thing about this is that it has nothing to do with white supremacy or white people. She was brought down by rich Zionists who were mad she didn't do enough to stop criticism of Israel and antisemitism on campus. Apparently her fraud was pretty well known and she wasn't brought down until everything that is happening with Israel since October. The best thing for white supremacists would be for her to stay in office because it shows how much of a diversity hire she was, discredits the Ivies, and it would mean they weren't cracking down on speech against Jews and Israel.
Instead of reporting on what is the actual truth is, this article makes it look like the people who want to bring her down are anti-Jewish. Somehow, these whites like Rufo have been scapegoated and Jews are the victims when it was criticism of Israel and Jews that brought her down in the first place. This is truly incredible stuff here.
More options
Context Copy link