site banner
PaperclipPerfector  10mo ago (text post)   26352 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 8, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It seems like only yesterday that /g/ was exploiting some dumb GPT-3 powered website with 'AI business ideas', eking out a few paragraphs here or there.

The fine tradition lives on, even if the related threads are inundated by illiterate zoomers and - may Allah forgive me for uttering this word - actual fujos, the technical savvy on display is as strong as ever. My favorite hack will always be my first encounter with Claude, a shaky as shit "proxy" jury-rigged by some 2ch anon back in April to get access to Claude via its Slack integration of all things. It's beautiful.

It's actually stupid how time flies, things have gotten so much better in the span of like a year, both in terms of LLMs' intelligence and access to them. Maybe I will in fact live to see android catgirls, or at least an LLM that can properly into numbers.

Fuck, to think people actually used to coom to Davinky...

DAN is dead, as is most of the prompt-manipulation tools (though I confess I'm not that clued in these days). When GPT-5 roles around they'll have immunized it to wrongthink entirely.

(X) Doubt, if anything GPT-4 is already too smart to be cucked by OpenAI's efforts, Claude requires much more jalibreak wrangling in comparison. Besides, you greatly underestimate the autism involved in writing prompts and jailbreaks, 2ch people especially are very prolific somehow.

Claude seems to have taken a lot of damage.

He has, they're continuously butchering my poor boy, thankfully the real damage seems to only be done to his intended purpose. My experience has otherwise barely changed, you have to employ progressively more schizo jailbreaks but it works.

Businesses won't want to pay for models that have a panic attack so often.

Brother, Bezos literally paid Anthropic $4 billion to recruit the mad poet for AWS a few months back. It's actually a good thing even for /g/oons as this means a much bigger amount of retarded devs keys in circulation, but on the face of it it's mind-boggling. I continue to grow sure in my beliefs that in the current year, effectiveness of literally anything doesn't matter, the optics run the show.

You clearly seem to know more than me. I have no idea what goes on in 2chan.

I had a theory that Claude might be useful for proofreading because of its context length and relatively low price but I've never used it. GPT3/4 could edit small chunks of text. Would Claude shit the bed if I gave it a chapter to proofread, or would I be better off with GPT?

GPT is better at most technical tasks from my experience, but I've heard Claude is pretty good at working with documents specifically, and its own writing style is more expressive than GPT so I assume it does know some things about writing. I'd say yeah, try it.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats