This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
My main problem with the proposal is that it intends to make the internet safe for children.
This is both impractical (there are tons of sites not suitable for kids for any number of reasons, many in foreign jurisdictions) and more generally not desirable (else we would need an age check in front of the motte as well, as well as a small fraction of Wikipedia).
Generally, ten year olds do not buy their own devices, their parents buy them for them. Let them take care to lock the devices down (using whitelisting), if they feel the need to buy them at all.
By the time kids are old enough to circumvent the blockers, I would argue your best bet is to have raised them to have raised them to take enough care of their own mental well-being that they will not search for videos of beheadings or porn acts which would disturb them, nor join every weird cult whose website they stumble upon.
If kids share porn in the schoolyard, the way to get rid of it would be to ban devices with unrestricted internet access from school.
"Think of the children" has long been a rallying cry of people opposing the free internet. Once these laws are in place, the legislative will notice that there are other countries which do not feel the need to follow US laws. The next step is then to pass laws to force ISPs to block these evil foreign websites. Once that infrastructure is in place, one might as well use it to block copyright infringement. Or hate speech.
Over the years, we have had moral panics about kids being exposed to rock and roll, satanic dungeon and dragons role playing, violent video games, et cetera. (Neither is this new: Socrates was charged with corrupting youth back in his day.) Given how these things turned out, I am not overly worried about a teenager being corrupted by seeing a sex video after searching for it.
More options
Context Copy link