This is the thirtieth weekly thread for people to discuss international news, foreign policy or IR history. I usually start off with coverage of some current events from a mix of countries I follow personally and countries I think the forum lives in or might be interested in. Feel free as well to drop in with coverage of countries you’re interested in, talk about ongoing dynamics like the wars in Israel or Ukraine, or even just whatever you’re reading.
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Guatemala
I’ve covered the Guatemalan election escapades for a while here, with the powers that be pulling every dirty trick in the book to hang onto their position, including somehow ruling that the party that won is illegal. Well now the Attorney General’s office has announced the nullification of the election due to irregularities. This is beginning to look less like an establishment flailing and more like a standard coup. The National Electoral Tribune has rejected the claim so it’s far from clear that there’s consensus among government institutions to crush Arevalo. He is nominally supposed to take power in a month on January 14; it’ll be a nail biter till then.
Modest correction: the Attorney General did not announce the nullification of the election, the Attorney General asked the electoral court to nullify the election, which the court has not done (yet).
You are correct in that this is the anti-Arrevelo establishment attempting a coup, but I'd disagree that it doesn't involve flailing. This is not the first time by any means that the prosecutor's office has tried to invalidate the election, and while the Government already targeted the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (4 of whom are in exile), it has virtually no regional or extra-regional public backing, including from the US (which sanctioned a few hundred influential Guatemalans over the weekend).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link