Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 124
- 4
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I've been playing
cyberpunk 2077Resident Evil: Village. It's the first time that I've played anything labelled "survival horror", and I'm trying to calibrate my expectations.I'm getting flashbacks to playing Dragon's Lair and Space Ace in the arcade. (Yes, I'm old.) The designers really like to take over your controls so they can show you an "exciting" cinematic, then hand the controls back suddenly to you. (The one indicator is a "[S]kip" prompt at the bottom right corner of your screen.)
Is this an RE:V thing? A Capcom thing? A survival horror thing?
The only fun survival horror game I've played was Fallout New Vegas: Dead Money. It was pretty light on the horror, which was good. I've always wondered whether there was anything else out there like that. Atmospheric, suspenseful, tense, but not going to give me nightmares.
Anyone got recommendations?
Subnautica?
More options
Context Copy link
Prey (2016) was really good. Perhaps heavier on the horror, but I’m not usually a fan of the genre, and I enjoyed it.
More options
Context Copy link
They're more adventure-ish than survival horror, but possibly the Echo Night series, depending on your definition of horror; the games involve ghosts, and some are antagonistic, but they're a far cry from Fatal Frame/Project Zero type spooky ghosts. Often, the goal is to free the ghosts, which may lessen the horror aspect and can be wholesome. But they can be hard games to recommend, due to possible frustration with saving/dying, some puzzles, and King's Field controls for the first two games. Emulation helps a lot.
I'm loving the old school graphics. I'll check these out.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
It's a resident evil thing, starting with 4. They were pretty common in action adventure games of that era like God of War and Uncharted. Devs had the ability to develop great Hollywood -style set pieces, but it was hard to make them interactive for the player, hence the QTE.
RE5 has some hilarious ones. I'll never forget having to punch that boulder!
More options
Context Copy link
They were big in the early 2000s, I think the PS2 God of War games popularized them.
Resident Evil 4 was famous for overusing them: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o1_3SdXcdMU
RE6 had a menu option to automatically pass all QTEs for people who hate them.
More options
Context Copy link
That set of annoyances are typically called Quicktime Events, and while they're more common in survival horror, they're (thankfully) not universal there, nor are they specific to it (the FFXIV MMORPG calls them Active Time Maneuvers, for example). While they can be done moderately well, they're famously unpopular, and my impression's that the Resident Evil series tends to be on the jankier side even for survival horror (Silent Hill, by contrast, only uses them as a way to reduce damage when you've already been hit by an attack, or as part of the killing blow for a boss).
Ha! Thanks.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link