site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 20, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When the first line is "The New York Times reports" take anything that follows with a solid helping of salt.

As is often the case in these sorts of stories, the headline is simultaneously true and also misleading. Yes "The Pentagon is moving toward letting AI weapons autonomously decide to kill humans" in the sense that getting drones/missiles/etc... to the point where they can independently recognize/identify a target or threat (and more pointedly, do so on a small enough footprint that the process can be run in something resembling real time) is a field of active study. That's not the same thing as handing the keys to Skynet. The irony is that the end goal of such research is actually the inverse of what is being portrayed. Killing everything in a grid square is pretty straight forward. Killing one specific thing and only that thing is a much harder problem. Nor are the applications for such research purely military, a major issue for both the aerospace and automotive industries is currently "See and Avoid" IE giving autopilots and self-driving cars the ability to recognize obstacles and navigate around them rather than simply following a preset route, likewise the ability to respond to conditional cues like a cop trying to pull them over or wave them through an intersection. But you don't see breathless articles about training self-driving cars to kill even though there a massive amount of overlap in the implementation.