This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
There are two kinds of "ceasefire people." The first are what are sometimes referred to as "useful idiots." These are people like, as it happens, my high school girlfriend, who has been posting on Instagram incessantly about a ceasefire. Does she have any idea what comes after a ceasefire? No, lol, of course not. She is simply upset that there are Things on TV that are not the Bachelor and she would like it if those Things stopped being on TV because they make her feel like Bad Things happen in the world. If Bad Things happen in the world then it's wrong of her to watch the Bachelor instead of trying to stop those Bad Things, so if those Bad Things could get off her TV that would be great thanks. Westerners (she is an American citizen but she is neither culturally American nor living in America) are made incredibly uncomfortable by violence by and large. Of course there are those who are not made uncomfortable by violence, what I term the Professionally Violent Class (cops, soldiers, bouncers, violent criminals, and graduates of these professions), but by and large Westerners are completely insulated from violence. Even in the "oh-so-violent" America, your odds of actually dealing with real physical violence on any given day are incredibly low if you're not a member of the Professionally Violent Class. So they see Bad Things happening on their television set or on twitter or instagram or whatever, and they say "oh my god that's horrible we have to stop it." There is no analysis beyond 'Bad Thing is happening -> we must stop Bad Thing.' It is an instinctual, gut-level reaction that speaks incredibly well of Western Civilization's ability to create a peaceful stable environment. Of course these are the same people who are trying to tear down Western Civilization but that's neither here nor there. Western Civilization has created a group of people who's relationship with violence is so incredibly abstract that just seeing it, not being subject to it, not participating in it, just seeing it makes them instinctively want to stop it. That is a shocking accomplishment.
Then there's the other type of "cease fire" person. They are the ideologue. They know that a ceasefire means Hamas gets to rebuild, recruit new members, and sing their victory from the rooftops. They are completely aware that a "ceasefire" is the best possible outcome for Hamas, and they are explicitly in favor of that, because for one reason or another they support Hamas. Maybe they're Palestinian and just really hate Jews/Israelis. Maybe they're Arab and just really hate Jews/Israelis. Maybe they're a member of Hamas, or one of a multitude of other Islamist organizations operating in the West under the guise of research or Islamic Brotherhood or what-have-you. These people are a small but not inconsiderable percentage of the "ceasefire" group.
So, to answer your questions, yesn't.
More options
Context Copy link