This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The apparent "Spirit of 68" was mostly a tiny vanguard getting signal boosted by a very sympathetic media, academia, and bureaucracy. The "Spirit of 16" never existed. Rather than a fervor that swept the nation, it felt more like a small, intense, yet frail flame that could be snuffed out at any moment due to overwhelming headwinds from the pro-68er institutional powers. Those headwinds successfully prevented the 16er movement from growing strong enough to convince normies to trade their 68er moral framework for an alt-right one.
I don't think ZHPL is (purely) grifting here though. Right-wing anger has been simmering since the Tea Party (earlier?) and Trumpism was its most recent eruption. Trust in the soap box and ballot box have been eroded by these failures. ZHPL is exhorting right wingers to resist demoralization and prepare for the next opportunity. I'm not terminally online (I don't use any social media), but I am doing most of the things he encourages right wingers to do, and if there were any actual opportunity to wrest control of the country from my enemies, I'd participate somehow. Perhaps he's trying to convince young men disappointed by the failure of Trumpism not to simply check out and take the blue pill.
More options
Context Copy link