This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What? PIS was blamed for nearly everything possible, but not for being "soft on Russia". There were some complaints that they were so incompetent that they effectively help Russia, hard in wrong ways, more or less viable attacks about specific people etc. But "soft on Russia" was one of the dumbest ways to attack PiS, maybe "being too cozy with Brussels" would be worse. So this was not pursued seriously.
Yes, some crazies on FB posted that giving Ukraine 200+ tanks was done by Russian agents. But that was not seriously believed by anyone with a working brain.
It was quite hard to be noticeably harder on Russia without making semi-suicidal moves.
Which ones?
Konfederacja was sole part which consistently went "Support for Ukraine is bad". And in the end they had not succeed (Korwin did korwin thing and started talking about one of his favourite topics).
not really, if anything war helped PiS
I second that, Polish society holds one of the least favorable views on Russia in the whole world, and PiS is the most hawkish Polish political party on the hard security issues. The party leaders have shown hostility towards Russia from decades and no careful observer of Polish political scene would accuse PiS of being "soft on Russia".
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link