naraburns nihil supernum
1yr ago
(text post)
29413 thread views
Israel-Gaza Megathread #1
This is a megathread for any posts on the conflict between (so far, and so far as I know) Hamas and the Israeli government, as well as related geopolitics. Culture War thread rules apply.
Well we just have a different understanding of 'white'.
You see this descriptive as a catch-all for all populations of humans with vaguely pale pinkish skin but I make a distinction between Western Europeans / Eastern Europeans / Turks / Arabs / North Africans etc. Therefore displacing certain populations out of Eastern Europe during WW2 -> made Eastern Europe whiter.
Arguably this is also what Ukraine is trying to do right now, as Russians can have more Asian features than Ukrainians.
But I don't really understand your conception of the 'Ukraine nation'. Is it better for Ukraine to be ruled by (Russian-speaking) Ukrainian jews or by Russians? Do Russian-speakers have a place in the Ukrainian nation?
is heavily misleading as it was almost 100% white also before German murdering spree
You're missing the other part of the sentence
100% white and Catholic
An ethnicity or ethnic group is a grouping of people who identify with each other on the basis of perceived shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups. Those attributes can include a common nation of origin, or common sets of ancestry, traditions, language, history, society, religion, or social treatment.
Likewise Israelis and Palestinians are very close in ancestry but with very important differences in culture and religion. I suppose that they do have some commonalities like their brutality toward non-kin sharing the space and their inability to love their enemies.
I am still waiting for withdrawal of your lies about supposed genocide denial
"You're missing the other part of the sentence" - yes, because it was actually true and it started in thread where you made bizarre claim about Holocaust making Poland significantly whiter
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Well we just have a different understanding of 'white'. You see this descriptive as a catch-all for all populations of humans with vaguely pale pinkish skin but I make a distinction between Western Europeans / Eastern Europeans / Turks / Arabs / North Africans etc. Therefore displacing certain populations out of Eastern Europe during WW2 -> made Eastern Europe whiter. Arguably this is also what Ukraine is trying to do right now, as Russians can have more Asian features than Ukrainians. But I don't really understand your conception of the 'Ukraine nation'. Is it better for Ukraine to be ruled by (Russian-speaking) Ukrainian jews or by Russians? Do Russian-speakers have a place in the Ukrainian nation?
You're missing the other part of the sentence
Likewise Israelis and Palestinians are very close in ancestry but with very important differences in culture and religion. I suppose that they do have some commonalities like their brutality toward non-kin sharing the space and their inability to love their enemies.
I am still waiting for withdrawal of your lies about supposed genocide denial
"You're missing the other part of the sentence" - yes, because it was actually true and it started in thread where you made bizarre claim about Holocaust making Poland significantly whiter
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link