This is a megathread for any posts on the conflict between (so far, and so far as I know) Hamas and the Israeli government, as well as related geopolitics. Culture War thread rules apply.
- 1849
- 20
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Your
was heavily misleading as this minorities (except barely present gypsies) were all white.
Are you now claiming that it is unlike Russia that has no central-Asia migrants?
Well the point is that the nazis ethnically cleansed Poland, rendering it almost 100% white and Catholic, and Poles have had no issue keeping it nearly 100% white and Catholic under USSR-regime. I'm sure they did gain a certain %age of Russians (relatively white and Orthodox) and perhaps some other Russian minorities, but this is completely unlike what happened to Germany, getting an avalanche of slightly brown but quite islamic Turks, not to speak of UK, France, Italy, the Netherlands, etc.
From an HBD perspective, this is not as much of a problem as African-origin migrants. If the central Asians do end up taking over Russia like the Golden Horde and pushing the more European West Russians from power, it would be a problem, but it's a large enough territory for them to share. Moreover the Russian regime seems intent on protecting Christian values like the family, unlike Western governments (and Ukraine) pushing LGBTQ+ matters on children.
Well we just have a different understanding of 'white'. You see this descriptive as a catch-all for all populations of humans with vaguely pale pinkish skin but I make a distinction between Western Europeans / Eastern Europeans / Turks / Arabs / North Africans etc. Therefore displacing certain populations out of Eastern Europe during WW2 -> made Eastern Europe whiter. Arguably this is also what Ukraine is trying to do right now, as Russians can have more Asian features than Ukrainians. But I don't really understand your conception of the 'Ukraine nation'. Is it better for Ukraine to be ruled by (Russian-speaking) Ukrainian jews or by Russians? Do Russian-speakers have a place in the Ukrainian nation?
You're missing the other part of the sentence
Likewise Israelis and Palestinians are very close in ancestry but with very important differences in culture and religion. I suppose that they do have some commonalities like their brutality toward non-kin sharing the space and their inability to love their enemies.
I am still waiting for withdrawal of your lies about supposed genocide denial
"You're missing the other part of the sentence" - yes, because it was actually true and it started in thread where you made bizarre claim about Holocaust making Poland significantly whiter
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link