naraburns nihil supernum
1yr ago
(text post)
29363 thread views
Israel-Gaza Megathread #1
This is a megathread for any posts on the conflict between (so far, and so far as I know) Hamas and the Israeli government, as well as related geopolitics. Culture War thread rules apply.
I'm thinking not so much of the atrocity-porn (although much of that is not exactly certain either); more of the sorts of things reported breathlessly in Western media with minimal (or fabricated) evidence -- like those guys on the island, various twitter 'ghost of kiev'-y stuff, others that I can't think of at the moment. Those had a definite info-ops feel to me -- hard to say whether amateur or pro ofc. Some of the things I am hearing now have a similar feel, is all.
Sure. And the proper response to that feeling is not to dismiss everything as having zero credibility.
That propaganda exists, and will exist in short or even immediate order in any context, doesn't mean that the counter-propaganda measure is to dismiss all things as zero-crediblity propaganda. That is the point of many propaganda strategies. Trying to get the audience to disengage, refuse to consider real facts, and be apathetic is not a failure state, it is the desired state for propaganda aimed at undermining resistance to emotionally objectionable things. Spreading around claims of other things with enough falses to trigger non-tailored doubt is a very easy way to do that.
That was the Hamas objective. You don't have a Daesh-style atrocity self-publicity campaign without wanting to escalate.
Assuming the Israeli war-hawk objective is to turn Gaza into a parking lot, they share this objective with Hamas. (and I think have more professional propagandists on staff)
If you tried to formulate this into an actual claim, it would implicitly require that the Israeli government was not, in fact, humiliated and caught off guard by one of the largest disasters in their history, but in fact knew about it well enough to have prepared entire sophisticated tailored IO campaigns in advance with the ability to launch within hours of attack... but not actually stopped the attack. The enemy was not successful while the government failed- the government was actually in control, but it's just evil!
While this will no doubt be a theory for some time, it's little more than 9-11 Trutherism with a tinge of zionism.
Spooks do spooky things, is that really a controversial statement?
Would it really be surprising that some Israeli spooks would have PR campaigns ready for the next Hamas attack?
Do you also believe that journalists were frantically scrambling to come up with their articles and biography, etc the day Elizabeth II passed?
Would it even be surprising that they would have a whole coordinated network of agents embedded within influential countries' media (and governments) ready to propagate that PR?
If the "I" in AIPAC stood for Italian we'd hear a lot more talk about the mafia.
Spooks do spooky things, is that really a controversial statement?
When it's used as a magic wand for conspiracy theories? Sure. Usually, even. Most conspiracy theories are controversial.
Would it really be surprising that some Israeli spooks would have PR campaigns ready for the next Hamas attack? Do you also believe that journalists were frantically scrambling to come up with their articles and biography, etc the day Elizabeth II passed?
What occurred over the weekend wasn't merely 'a PR campaign,' largely because it wasn't actually the Israelis driving it. The primary drivers of engagement were the perpetrators and their supporters social media channels, which were in turn picked up, signal boosted, and dissimenated by social media dynamics the Israelis have never demonstrated functional control of.
We saw what Israeli-affiliated and associated government media were trying to do over the weekend. It had very little to do with the viral news cycle that saw the unexpectedly overly successful pro-Hamas people egregiously overstep their local political pieties.
What occurred over the weekend wasn't merely 'a PR campaign,' largely because it wasn't actually the Israelis driving it. The primary drivers of engagement were the perpetrators and their supporters social media channels, which were in turn picked up, signal boosted, and dissimenated by social media dynamics the Israelis have never demonstrated functional control of.
So it's Hamas that spread the claim that they decapitated babies?
Just like Assad was the one spreading the news that he was gassing his own people conveniently right after the US said they would not do anything to Syria unless Syria used chemical weapons?
Saddam bragged about having WMDs?
And Russia bombed its own pipeline as well?
Trump created the piss-dossier and asked the FBI to investigate him for it?
The enemies of the war-hawks in Washington DC just seem to keep making these obvious PR mistakes that provide material for these war-hawks to do what they love to do. Weird, uh.
The primary drivers of engagement were the perpetrators and their supporters social media channels, which were in turn picked up, signal boosted, and disseminated by social media dynamics the Israelis have never demonstrated functional control of.
Something happened in the Middle-East, social media users, some close to the Hamas, posted about it. Elon Musk's X let it happen because he's only 99.9% owned by the Establishment.
Then Establishment media started commenting on it and finding some posts from social media users, some close to the Mossad and started spinning a story about beheaded babies.
We still afaik have no evidence of these beheaded babies.
Entire Western world media is now behind a massive propaganda campaign to make it acceptable to starve / bomb / gas 1 to 2 million civilians in a small urban area.
These events are completely independent to previous wars in the Middle-East and other Establishment ops.
Remember this picture ? The poor innocent child who washed up on the shore after evil Europeans did not want to take in Syrian refugees?
Oh, hey, the person who missed the point of the post they quoted is still jousting at a strawman without demonstrating awareness of what they were quoting the second time. Imagine that.
Par for course, perhaps, but underwhelming as usual.
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Sure. And the proper response to that feeling is not to dismiss everything as having zero credibility.
That propaganda exists, and will exist in short or even immediate order in any context, doesn't mean that the counter-propaganda measure is to dismiss all things as zero-crediblity propaganda. That is the point of many propaganda strategies. Trying to get the audience to disengage, refuse to consider real facts, and be apathetic is not a failure state, it is the desired state for propaganda aimed at undermining resistance to emotionally objectionable things. Spreading around claims of other things with enough falses to trigger non-tailored doubt is a very easy way to do that.
If you tried to formulate this into an actual claim, it would implicitly require that the Israeli government was not, in fact, humiliated and caught off guard by one of the largest disasters in their history, but in fact knew about it well enough to have prepared entire sophisticated tailored IO campaigns in advance with the ability to launch within hours of attack... but not actually stopped the attack. The enemy was not successful while the government failed- the government was actually in control, but it's just evil!
While this will no doubt be a theory for some time, it's little more than 9-11 Trutherism with a tinge of zionism.
Spooks do spooky things, is that really a controversial statement? Would it really be surprising that some Israeli spooks would have PR campaigns ready for the next Hamas attack? Do you also believe that journalists were frantically scrambling to come up with their articles and biography, etc the day Elizabeth II passed?
Would it even be surprising that they would have a whole coordinated network of agents embedded within influential countries' media (and governments) ready to propagate that PR? If the "I" in AIPAC stood for Italian we'd hear a lot more talk about the mafia.
When it's used as a magic wand for conspiracy theories? Sure. Usually, even. Most conspiracy theories are controversial.
What occurred over the weekend wasn't merely 'a PR campaign,' largely because it wasn't actually the Israelis driving it. The primary drivers of engagement were the perpetrators and their supporters social media channels, which were in turn picked up, signal boosted, and dissimenated by social media dynamics the Israelis have never demonstrated functional control of.
We saw what Israeli-affiliated and associated government media were trying to do over the weekend. It had very little to do with the viral news cycle that saw the unexpectedly overly successful pro-Hamas people egregiously overstep their local political pieties.
So it's Hamas that spread the claim that they decapitated babies? Just like Assad was the one spreading the news that he was gassing his own people conveniently right after the US said they would not do anything to Syria unless Syria used chemical weapons? Saddam bragged about having WMDs? And Russia bombed its own pipeline as well? Trump created the piss-dossier and asked the FBI to investigate him for it?
The enemies of the war-hawks in Washington DC just seem to keep making these obvious PR mistakes that provide material for these war-hawks to do what they love to do. Weird, uh.
Yawn. While it's interesting you think this is a rebuttal to what you think you quoted, it's not a rebuttal to what was actually written.
Something happened in the Middle-East, social media users, some close to the Hamas, posted about it. Elon Musk's X let it happen because he's only 99.9% owned by the Establishment. Then Establishment media started commenting on it and finding some posts from social media users, some close to the Mossad and started spinning a story about beheaded babies. We still afaik have no evidence of these beheaded babies. Entire Western world media is now behind a massive propaganda campaign to make it acceptable to starve / bomb / gas 1 to 2 million civilians in a small urban area.
These events are completely independent to previous wars in the Middle-East and other Establishment ops.
Remember this picture ? The poor innocent child who washed up on the shore after evil Europeans did not want to take in Syrian refugees?
Oh, hey, the person who missed the point of the post they quoted is still jousting at a strawman without demonstrating awareness of what they were quoting the second time. Imagine that.
Par for course, perhaps, but underwhelming as usual.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link