site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1yr ago (text post)   28112 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 18, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

as I've told you before, HBDers don't think genetics is the be all and end all.

And yet HBDers keep arguing the contrary.

To be blunt, you either endorse the linked comment or you don't. Which is it?

To be blunt, you either endorse the linked comment or you don't. Which is it?

Did you stop beating your wife? Yes or no answers only 🙏

I see what you're trying to do, and I am not going to change tack

I am not going to change tack

Have you ever? Not where I've seen it.

You know better than to drop into this level of petty back-and-forth.

In my defense, I did stop before you have reason to do more than mildly admonish me. I'm not kidding about Hlynka being deaf to anything inconvenient for him, he's been misrepresenting my position for like the fifth time over, each one with me in the comments explaining that, no, HBD isn't the claim that all human differences are inherently genetic.

If there's a politer way to point out someone acting in clear bad faith, or in the utter absence of good, it's no longer obvious to me or I've used it up on him ages ago.

Right back at you, link me an example of yourself or some other prominent HBDer arguing that cultural attitudes matter more than melanin content and I'll shut up concede the point.

Nice snide little comment — especially since most HBDer would cite Igbo as being intelligent population that has black skin.

But I do think genes matter more than environment, at least in the modern setting. That doesn’t mean environment doesn’t matter. I’d probably put it 60-70 genes and the balance environment noting the two intersect (genes help build environment and environment reinforced the success of certain genes).

As my comment above expresses, I think that cultural attitudes mattered a lot more than genes 250 years ago. They don't now, though.

If cultural attitudes used to matter more than genes, does this not falsify the claim that "it's all genetics"?

Likewise, what grounds do you have for believing that that cultural attitudes have stopped mattering, and will not matter in the future?

If cultural attitudes used to matter more than genes, does this not falsify the claim that "it's all genetics"?

The phrase "it's all genetics", if you interpret it as "racial differences in outcomes in intelligence and educational attainment in the modern day are more genetic than they are cultural", is true imo. I think a lot of posters here are frustrated with their longtime back and forth with you and are being less than precise as a result, which is pretty understandable.

Likewise, what grounds do you have for believing that that cultural attitudes have stopped mattering, and will not matter in the future?

I mean, 'cultural attitudes' means 'any attitudes that are shared between individuals'. Those obviously matter in many senses, and will continue to. That they don't matter for, specifically, racial differences in educational attainment doesn't mean they don't matter for many other things, e.g. what one does with that intelligence and education.

You know better than to drop into this level of petty back-and-forth.

melanin content

In the comment of mine you linked to, I was discussing the differences in educational outcomes between middle-class students attending private schools and working-class students in state schools - in Ireland. Ireland, as you may be aware, is about 90% white. Almost every student in either the private or state schools under discussion is white. In my experience, if anything the private schools tend to be more ethnically diverse than the state schools, which doesn't impact on their having consistently higher educational outcomes than the state schools. If you think that the comment you linked to proves that I think poor black people are less intelligent than rich white people - well, it doesn't. You are simply, unambiguously wrong.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats