Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 166
- 3
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yeah, the end of Season 1 didn't really make sense on it's own terms either, I thought it was absurd plotting.
As a non-book reader, the ethnicity of the casting of the Two Rivers characters doesn't bother me all that much on a visceral level, possibly because the in-show world building isn't very deep, so I don't have a strong sense of those in Two Rivers actually being a distinct ethnic group. My impression from the in-show world building is more that the timelines are shorter/shallower than the book timelines, and it may not have been all that long since the Breaking. Maybe only a few hundred years? So these are all towns full of refugees from the past world wide civilization that was destroyed, and in the show it's been long enough for low technology to be the only thing living characters remember, but not so long that visually (or even especially culturally) distinct people groups have formed. It isn't like the Balkans, where in addition to looking similar physically, every village has its own distinct embroidery pattern or something. I realize this probably doesn't make as much sense overall as the book world building, though.
Anyway, the in-show logic of the first four episodes of the new season is alright, much better than the end of Season 1, and it's handled rather well for following a separated ensemble cast. Visuals are really a strength -- most of it looks quite good, with nice shots, sets, lighting, costumes, etc (as long as, again, it's meant to be a continent full of refugees and relatively short timeline).
Well who knows? They felt free to make up a wife for Perrin. The idea makes sense but doesn't leave too much room for Artur Hawkwing, Trolloc Wars or Cadsuane the in-lore girlboss - would've thought they'd leave some space for her at least. Anything can happen.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link