This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm rather attached to my genes, so there's no way in hell I'd raise a kid who wasn't related to me. That's not to say that's it not good public and private policy for those who can do so and still retain a genetic lineage (easier for women than men, since barring the odd gay dude it's unheard of for men to buy an ovum, fertilize it and find a surrogate). *
It's still a much better bet than adoption, leaving aside family horror stories, by adopting, you're far more likely to end up with the kind of kid who's parents were deadbeats, and unfortunately that's genetic. I'm sure you can shop around for a kid from a good background, like from some college student who got knocked up, an orphan etc, but it's not a risk I would take, not that I'd adopt in the first place.
However, I certainly support positive eugenics of this type, if you're choosing the parents, you can do much worse than the chiseled Adonis's your friend is spoiled for choice between.
*I'm not attached to all of them, I'd be first in line to free my kids of genetic curses like myopia, acne or ADHD the first chance I get. I'd still like them to share as many genes as possible, at least until we're all post-biological.
More options
Context Copy link