This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
For now, I would recommend against trying to make an allegory about transness, because the trans movement appears to me to be still far too much in philosophical flux for me to have any confidence that an acceptable, compassionate understanding arrived at today will still be considered so a few years from now. Because some pretty basic questions still seem to be actively controversial:
What is transness, exactly? How does it relate to gender dysphoria? What is gender, for that matter, and how is it related to sex? And I could go on, but that's probably enough already to ignite a firestorm of controversy, perhaps from participants who would all insist that there is no controversy.
Can you be confident that an answer you give today will not be seen as either the bigoted hooting of a backwards troglodyte, or a preposterous strawman that nobody serious ever really believed, by the time your game comes out? (Or, in fact, that won't be seen as both at once by equally legitimate-seeming camps today?) Cardinal Richelieu once said that he could find a capital crime in no more than six lines written by the most honest of men; on this topic I'd expect it's closer to six words. Progress on the trans movement, more than anything else today, can move at breakneck speeds, and if you don't want to risk it breaking your neck, I recommend standing clear until it has arrived at its destination.
If you are confident that you see a coherent philosophy undergirding the present state of the trans movement, I would like to hear what it is, though I personally don't think I'm likely to expect it to hold.
More options
Context Copy link